Rebooting analytics leadership: Time to move beyond the math
PART I
To help their
organizations capitalize on artificial intelligence and analytics, CAOs must do
more than demonstrate their technical chops. They need to lead like a Catalyst.
The role of the chief
analytics officer (CAO) is
being thrust into the spotlight as artificial intelligence (AI) technology
continues to improve—and prove its value. AI and other advanced analytics will unlock $9.5 trillion to $15.4
trillion annually, with recent AI
advances such as deep learning alone making up nearly 40 percent of the total.
Exhibit 1 PLEASE SEE THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Given the enormity of
the stakes, it’s no surprise that CEOs are asking their CAOs (or those assuming
CAO duties under a different title) to deploy and scale AI and advanced
analytics—stat. Yet while the opportunity is great, so too is the challenge.
In McKinsey research earlier this year, only 8
percent of senior executives reported that their organization engages in
practices identified as key enablers for AI and analytics at scale (Exhibit 1).
The reasons for low
success rates to date are numerous, as CAOs face a barrage of headwinds—from
data silos and rising data risks to leaders and front lines resistant to a new
way of data-driven decision making—while experiencing some of the lowest
tenures among their peers (about two to three years).1 One analytics leader told us, for example, that
while his organization hired him to create a data and analytics function that
could scale to drive growth, progress was constantly derailed, as his team was
forced to spend outsized time generating basic reports for narrowly focused
business leaders.
How can CAOs cut
through the whirlwind of obstacles to help their organization capture a larger
piece of the advanced analytics prize than their competitors?
Based on our extensive
experience working with analytics leaders and a series of in-depth interviews
with some who have been successful, we believe one key to success will be for
CAOs to assume the role of Catalyst—a new persona that redefines leadership for
deploying analytics and AI at scale.
Successful CAOs of times past
Historically, we’ve
seen that successful CAOs have often been buoyed by an analytically minded CEO
or a mission-critical situation. Their organizations fit into one of three
types:
1.
Born digital, with data
and analytics as their lifeblood, leading them to position their CAOs as core
members of the C-suite.
2.
Led by an analytically driven
CEO who aggressively made analytics the top priority and rallied all executives
and business units behind the effort.
3.
In crisis, facing a
significant threat to their business model and, sometimes, to their very
existence. These organizations required analytics to compete and put CAOs
squarely in charge of their business transformation.
But most companies
faced a different reality: an organizational desire to move to an
analytics-driven approach but without a forceful push from a visionary CEO or
existential crisis.
Among these companies,
analytics leaders made progress in line with the times. The 1990s were arguably
ground zero for data and analytics, as the Internet had only just opened to the
public and begun generating data. The title “CAO” didn’t even exist yet. Simply
establishing a data-science capability somewhere in the organization amounted
to success, putting math-minded mavericks and statistical geniuses in the best
position to thrive (Exhibit 2).
Exhibit 2 PLEASE SEE THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE
The early 2000s saw a
massive increase in data generation, thanks in large part to broadband and the
rise of Internet-based businesses and social-media platforms. Better data
capture and analytics technologies emerged in response, raising the bar for success.
CEOs began placing higher expectations on analytics leaders, and the true role
of CAO was born. In this environment, data evangelists who could seed data and
analytics usage a bit more broadly—even if unevenly—throughout their
organizations were heralded for their achievements.
However, the next
decade brought a new level of urgency. Digital natives became increasingly
successful, upping the intensity of competition. The number of data-generating
smartphones surpassed the number of humans on the planet, making data-hungry
machine learning techniques even more commercially viable. Organizations needed
a more aggressive CAO to embed analytics more consistently across the
organization. While good at achieving this goal, the aggressive CAO’s strong
push, against what was often significant organizational resistance, left many
organizations soured, requiring a new CAO persona to facilitate further change.
A demanding environment for today’s CAOs
This brings us to
today, when organizations are looking to CAOs to capture a share of the huge AI opportunity, which necessitates a degree of
scale not previously required—and in a far more demanding environment.
Digital natives are
ratcheting up the competition for wallet share to new levels as they push
into an increasing number of sectors, from grocery to financial
services.
The use of AI and
analytics has become table stakes in delivering consumers the personalized attention and
experiences they demand as
the universe of analytics tools expands and becomes more widely available
thanks to the cloud. In fact, nearly a third of the value these technologies
are expected to drive in the near term is projected to come from marketing
and sales use cases.
At the same time, risks
have grown exponentially, as organizations balance concerns around data privacy and information security.
“Nearly every analytics project that we’re working on right now has run into a
delay as we have encountered new data-security requirements,” said one
analytics leader at a large insurer.
Against this backdrop,
CAOs also face plenty of organizational challenges as they strive to stand up a
scalable analytics function. They must navigate long-standing processes, stitch
together data silos, and challenge legacy power structures that keep analytics
in the back seat to business.
CAOs often find
themselves doing this heavy lifting with a limited sphere of influence. They
typically do not have the profit-and-loss or revenue accountability that would
grant them due power in the organization. Moreover, like chief marketing
officers a decade ago, CAOs need—but typically lack—a true seat at the C-suite
table, placing them at a disadvantage when trying to obtain adequate funding or
resources to power the analytics agenda.
Enter the Catalyst
Arguably, none of the
previous CAO personas could succeed in today’s landscape. We’ve entered an era
that requires a new CAO persona—the Catalyst—who embraces a style of leadership
geared toward addressing the current demands, roadblocks, and scrutiny most
companies face today when it comes to deploying AI and advanced analytics at
scale. Catalysts approach their role very differently than did past CAO
personas, in ways that those with more scientific and technical career
backgrounds might not have ever done before. They both facilitate and lead the
charge in five key areas. (To see if you approach the CAO role like a Catalyst,
see Exhibit 3.)
1. Convening a coalition of equals
Catalysts build a
tri-headed “coalition of equals” made up of the CAO, the business, and IT.
Creating this coalition might be the most critical driver for bringing
analytics initiatives to scale and success—and is often the most difficult to
achieve due to long-standing hierarchies and the CAO’s position as the “new
C-suiter on the block.”
As a group, this
coalition of equals understands the company’s need to compete with integrated
capabilities in this hypercompetitive era and that silos—of data, business functions, or culture—will prevent them from doing so.
It recognizes that integrating digital and analytics elements into nearly every
existing product and service creates opportunities to offer entirely new
products and services. The group knows success in these efforts is predicated
on joint efforts, close collaboration, and shared ownership. The coalition
shares equally in decision making, and coalition members rally around a common
goal: gaining a disproportionate share of value from advanced analytics and AI
compared with their competitors.
The former analytics
leader at a leading financial-services company told us how developing such a
coalition of equals enabled his company to build enterprise-wide capabilities,
scaling from about 30 to 200 profitable, revenue-generating use cases in two
years.
An analytics leader at
an online retailer also found the coalition of equals instrumental in
maintaining momentum when the innovation process is in its infancy. “Moving to
AI-driven automation is a challenging process, and often it’s the second and
third iterations that work,” he said. “But you have to have faith and momentum
to get to those second and third iterations. The partnerships I had with other
leaders allowed me to drive organization-wide changes and adoption.”
Catalysts actively
facilitate and take a leadership position in building the coalition, while
bringing along other stakeholders at multiple levels. They do so in the
following ways:
·
Recognizing
that while a technical background is critical, there’s much more to driving
success.
“While it’s critical to get the
math right, just getting the math right doesn’t drive the change,” said one
insurance analytics leader. “You need the technical background to establish
credibility, but the job is less about the technical aspect and more about
employee development, resource allocation, vision setting, and leadership to
manage the pace of change.”
·
Putting
business value front and center.
The same insurance analytics leader
stated: “It’s gaining the trust of business-unit leaders by helping them to
understand how the models influence business impact and, ultimately, drive
profit and loss. That’s what they’re interested in.”
·
Spending
an outsized proportion of time on communicating with the CEO and other C-suite
leaders to maintain their support.
For example, a financial-services
analytics leader set up monthly operational committee meetings with his COO,
CIO, CFO, and business-unit heads to set a shared vision and review priorities,
progress, new value-creation opportunities, and investment needs. Throughout
the month, he met separately with committee members, along with other company
leaders, to maintain alignment and buy-in. He estimated that more than
one-third of his time was spent on executive alignment and strategy.
Another analytics leader emphasized the need to communicate—and to do so in a way that’s in line with the C-suite’s level of knowledge and past experience. For example, in presenting new pricing methods to business leaders, he highlighted that the notions of understanding underlying costs wouldn’t change; the team would simply bring in more data about consumer behavior to drive a more precise understanding of pricing.
Another analytics leader emphasized the need to communicate—and to do so in a way that’s in line with the C-suite’s level of knowledge and past experience. For example, in presenting new pricing methods to business leaders, he highlighted that the notions of understanding underlying costs wouldn’t change; the team would simply bring in more data about consumer behavior to drive a more precise understanding of pricing.
·
Spending
considerable time codeveloping strategies with business leaders to align
analytics opportunities and innovation with the business unit’s vision and
priorities.
Joint ownership is essential,
one analytics leader emphasized. He worked with business leaders to create a
shared scorecard so that both analytics and the business were measured on the
same outcomes.
Another leader found that starting from a perspective of joint learning and sharing helped him overcome skepticism and “earn the right” to advise on organizational implications and influence business strategy.
Another leader found that starting from a perspective of joint learning and sharing helped him overcome skepticism and “earn the right” to advise on organizational implications and influence business strategy.
·
Viewing
IT as a strategic partner rather than simply as an execution arm.
This can include bringing IT into
meetings to develop and formalize new business strategies, soliciting input
from engineering teams, and ensuring IT receives recognition for its role in
transformation initiatives. Ultimately, this type of partnership approach not
only helps build a motivated IT organization but also attracts the best IT
talent.
CONTINUES IN PART II
By Brian McCarthy,
Chris McShea, and Marcus
Roth
https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-analytics/our-insights/rebooting-analytics-leadership-time-to-move-beyond-the-math?cid=other-eml-alt-mip-mck-oth-1811&hlkid=f5c82c5620034dbeb6216c7ac7e7d1fd&hctky=1627601&hdpid=b3b5de99-d83f-4794-8650-4068aa0b1084
No comments:
Post a Comment