LEADERSHIP ACROSS CULTURES
Traits of influential leaders
vary according to region says Gurnek Bains
The rise of prominent
Indians to CEO roles in global firms like Google, Diageo and PepsiCo and the
increasing global footprint of some of India's best known companies might
suggest that our leaders know how to lead effectively across cultures. But the
truth is, there is still a long way to go before many Indian leaders are able
to step onto the world stage and lead in an effective manner. The same applies
to leaders from every major global culture just the issues each culture has
to navigate is different.
There is no such thing as a
global multi-national and the cultures of even the most dispersed global firms
are firmly embedded in the country of their origin. The top leadership of such
firms is often surprisingly uniform and monochromatic. Firmly embedded in such
firms is a clear view of how influence needs to be exercised. Missteps and
failures when leading people from cultures outside of one's zone of familiarity
are therefore all too common.
For example, in
Scandinavian societies, leadership is a term that has negative connotations.
Anyone from outside who expects orders to be unquestioningly obeyed typically
experiences a rude shock. In many East Asian countries, there exists what an
authoritarian compact. Leaders are obeyed assiduously up to a point, but if
they fall off the high standards expected, rebellions on a big or small scale
can occur. In parts of Africa, people take comfort from a leader acting as “the
big man“. In others, humility big man“. In others, humility and gentle
authority is prized.
Each culture has deeply
rooted cultural tendencies, which arise from the challenges that that society
has faced from time immemorial. These predi lections -such as emotional
positivity, attitudes towards authority or comfort in unfamiliar social set
tings -have a genetic base.Leaders from each global culture have strengths but
also weaknesses they need to be aware of.
In our research, we found
senior Indian leaders had an edge in terms of drive, strategic thinking and
intellectual f lexibility. Indian cultural DNA also equips Indian leaders to
manage diversity and difference effec tively. These strengths work power fully
in today's world and help explain why Indians sometimes have more suc cess than
leaders from other cultures.
However, we also found
Indian leaders were poor with respect to teamwork. Their confidence was brittle
and their ability to project themselves confidently as leaders, variable. Furthermore,
Indian leaders were relatively poor with respect to self-insight and had a
surprisingly frequent tendency to react defensively to challenging feedback. It
is always dangerous to stereotype and it is always important in global business
to look at the person “beyond the race“. Awareness of one's default cultural
tendencies and empathy and appreciation for different ways of leading and being
led is essential in today's multi-polar world.
Gurnek Bains is Chairman
and Co-Founder of consulting firm YSC
ET30DEC15
No comments:
Post a Comment