Better Believe it, Butter is Better
Now that America is taking
trans fats off the menu, we'll know about other ultra-processed `foods' that
benefit industry and harm consumers
Why would you buy a processed food
that tastes worse than what it was designed to replace, doesn't exist in
nature, and helps kill you?
Either because you had no choice or had been misled about its essence. And that's exactly the situation most Americans find themselves in regarding partially hydrogenated oils and the trans fats they contain.
Either because you had no choice or had been misled about its essence. And that's exactly the situation most Americans find themselves in regarding partially hydrogenated oils and the trans fats they contain.
The good news is that -finally -the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is banning food containing trans fats,
although really only sort of, and really only after overwhelming evidence (and
more than one lawsuit) made their dangers impossible to ignore. And in typical
pro-industry fashion, the FDA is not only allowing companies three years to get
trans fats out of most foods, but will consider manufacturers' petitions to
keep them in.
Partially hydrogenated oils were
invented 100 years ago, and quickly became popular in the form of margarine and
vegetable shortening. Their inclusion in thousands of other products and use as
frying oil or coffee `whitener' is more recent.
Thanks to their extension of shelf
life, cost benefits to the processed food industry and the unfounded notion
that they were healthier than the fats they replaced (asserted even by
wellintentioned health organisations), they became ubiquitous. And they remain
in many processed foods, supplanting real ingredients like butter, lard and
less processed oils.
But partially hydrogenated oils have
benefited no one except their manufacturers and the producers of the junk that
includes them.And the three-year phase-out means more deaths from people
consuming a substance that should have been taken off the market at least a
decade ago.(Studies finding that trans fats were worse than animal fats were
published in the early 1990s.) The FDA knows this. Its acting commissioner,
Stephen Ostroff, said that eliminating trans fats “is expected to reduce
coronary heart disease and prevent thousands of fatal heart attacks every
year.“ So why wait three years? Why not get these heart-stopping products off
the shelves now, as we do when food is contaminated with E coli?
Protecting Big Food's profits is the only possible answer.
Protecting Big Food's profits is the only possible answer.
It may be really expensive for Big
Food to replace partially hydrogenated oils -the FDA itself estimates the cost
at $6 billion -mainly because trying to mimic their performance is going to be
tricky . Tough luck. No one can possibly estimate the profits that these oils
have garnered or their damage to the public.
The so-called alternatives already
exist: you make croissants with butter and you use half-and-half, not
`creamer', in your coffee.Anything else is a waste of calories anyway . Chronic
diseases aside, it's impossible to estimate how much good eating we've missed
because misinformed people told us that margarine is better than butter,
partially hydrogenated soybean oil is better than olive oil.
Once again it's clear that too often
the primary concern of government watchdog agencies is to protect corporate
profits rather than public health. Otherwise we'd know how much sugar was in
processed food, we'd have long since banned the routine use of anti biotics in
animal production, we'd have salmonella free chicken and we'd have forbidden
the marketing and sale of soda and other liquid candy to minors.
Instead, people sicken and die from
eating `food' that's known to be unhealthy . We let industry buy time -at our
expense -while they research and develop alternatives that might be no better
than the stuff they'll replace, and whose safety still won't be guaranteed by
the FDA.
Lard is not the `healthiest' food in
the world, but at least no one tells you it's `better' than other naturally
occurring fats, as was claimed about trans fats. No one with a palate ever said
that partially hydrogenated oils tasted better than naturally occurring fats.
And a well-made pie, a beautifully
frosted cake and perfectly crisped fried food are treats, occasional
indulgences. Let's make them as well as we can, rather than take short cuts
using phony ingredients that don't taste good and are unhealthy . That should
be a onetwo punch that clears the market of many `alternative' fats -and, for
that matter, of many other ultra-processed `foods' that benefit industry and
harm consumers.
Mark Bittman
|
©The New York Times
No comments:
Post a Comment