How Do Leaders Manage the Tension Between Pride and
Arrogance?
Managing the tension between pride and arrogance is one of the
most difficult, sensitive issues facing top executives. James Heskett asks what
leaders can do to prevent pride in an organization from becoming arrogance.
Some would say that the most important task of leadership is
that of leading change. Others maintain that it’s the job of fine-tuning and
preserving an organization’s culture—its values and behaviors—to enable it to
execute successful strategies.
Recent events, including several well-publicized corporate
missteps as well as statements made during the recent United States
presidential campaigns, suggest that managing the tension between pride and
arrogance is one of the most difficult, sensitive issues facing leaders.
The consequences when organizations cross the line between pride
and arrogance can be substantial. Just ask leaders like the erstwhile CEO of
Lululemon—a company with a well-timed dedication to fitness with employees
fanatical about its mission—who forgot this when he apologized to employees for
a snafu in introducing a fabric into the Company’s athletic garments that, when
stretched, became transparent. He went on to explain on Bloomberg TV that “Some
women’s bodies don’t work for the pants.” Employee behaviors began reflecting
this attitude, according to complaints lodged against the company. The hit to
Lululemon’s bottom line was reasonably immediate and significant. It cost the CEO his job.
There is a real pay-off from building pride among an
organization’s employees. It can result in greater loyalty, higher
productivity, and lower recruiting and training costs, among other things. Ways
that pride is fostered include an inspiring mission, a set of values that are
carefully observed, a “way of doing things around here” that is consistent with
expectations, an organization that brings people together in teams to carry out
their tasks, and an effort to ensure that the organization is a good corporate
citizen, often through group activities away from the job.
In short, employee pride can serve an organization in many
ways—until it doesn’t. That’s the point at which arrogance among proud
employees begins to get in the way of effective relationships with customers,
suppliers, and even investors. At a national level, it can damage international
relations. Here’s a sample of some indicators of differences between pride and
arrogance:
Pride
·
We work for the customer
·
We worry about what we can learn from others
·
We’re open to the outside world
·
We’re still David
·
We spend our time listening to, and hearing, outside views.
Arrogance
·
We work for each other
·
We worry about what others can learn from us
·
We practice secrecy in dealing with the outside world
·
We’re Goliath, and we need to defend our position
·
We spend our time improving what we have and finding flaws in
outside views
What can leaders do to ensure that arrogance isn’t the
unintended result of efforts to build pride in an organization? Is this
relevant for political as well as business leaders? How do you manage the
tension between pride and arrogance? What do you think?
by James Heskett
http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/how-do-leaders-manage-the-tension-between-pride-and-arrogance?cid=spmailing-13865151-WK%20Newsletter%2011-30-2016%20(1)-November%2030,%202016
No comments:
Post a Comment