HR SPECIAL How to Turn Frogs into Princes and Other
Interview ….. Tips
More hiring errors are made in the first few minutes of an interview than at any other time.
If you’re so inclined, you might want to check out this report in Personal Psychology, “The Structured Employment Interview: Narrative and Quantitative Review of the Research Literature.” The study reviewed all of the literature regarding the predictability of the interview, coming to the following basic conclusions:- A structured interview is more effective than winging it, overvaluing first impressions, box checking skills, asking brain teasers, or trusting your gut.
- Defining the work that needs to be done is more important that a laundry list of skills and experiences.
- Specific guidance is required to convert the candidate's answers into an accurate assessment. Yes/no voting, informal discussions, or judging someone on feelings, intuition or emotions are all ineffective.
·
Whether your company has an interviewing system
like this or not, most hiring errors can be simply eliminated by controlling
the tendency to make instant judgments about candidates best on their first
impressions.
·
Despite the fact that there is no research
showing any correlation with on-the-job performance and first impressions, many
people remain unconvinced. If you’ve ever met or hired a person who makes a
good first impression and is not a top performer, you have some proof of its
inability to predict performance. If you’ve ever met or hired someone who
doesn’t make a good first impression and is a top performer, you have all of
the proof you need. While a sample of two is insufficient to make the no
correlation claim, it does suggest that controlling the impact of first
impressions can increase the accuracy of the interview. It also can help when
meeting anyone for the first time, whether at a business meeting, party, or
first date.
·
The problem with first impressions is that those
that make good ones are given the benefit of the doubt regarding competency (or
datability). Those who are quiet, temporarily nervous, not natural interviewers
or whose appearance is not up to expectations, are instantly assumed
incompetent. The balance of the interview is then used to gather evidence to
prove these initial false conclusions, or the meeting is cut short. The
following tips will help minimize these types of self-induced hiring errors
10 Simple Ideas on How to Minimize the Impact of First Impressions on Decision-making
10 Simple Ideas on How to Minimize the Impact of First Impressions on Decision-making
1. Wait 30 Minutes.
Force
yourself to delay any possible yes or no decision until you review the person’s
work-history in-depth.
.
2. Do
the Opposite of Your Natural Response.
Note
your initial reaction to the person and then reverse your normal response. If
positive, become more cynical, seeking information where the person has
under-performed. When negative, assume the person is fully-competent and seek
out facts to prove this.
3.Treat
the Person as a Consultant.
People
who are considered experts in their field like doctors, lawyers and $500 per
hour consultants, are treated with respect and assumed to be competent. Treat
all candidates this way, regardless of how they look.
4.Conduct
a Panel Interview.
Since
they’re less personal and more business-like, a well-organized panel interview
naturally minimizes the impact of first impressions.
5.Conduct
a Phone Screen Before the Onsite Interview.
First
impressions have less impact when the interviewer has already had a personal
conversation with the candidate. It’s even better if the candidate has
accomplished something important related to real job requirements.
6.Ask
More Questions About Team Skills.
Ask
everyone what teams they’ve been assigned to, how they got assigned to them,
and how successful they were. If these teams are growing in size and
importance, you’ll know if the person’s success is attributed to first
impressions or leadership ability.
7.Listen
to the Judge.
Collect
all of the required evidence before making any yes/no decision. Once a decision
is made, the rest of the interview is used to collect information to validate
it.
8.Determine if First Impressions
Helped or Hindered Job Performance.
Rather than being seduced by first impressions, seek out
evidence to determine how it affected job performance. If first impressions are
useful predictors, those with good ones should be better performers than
everyone else.
9.Measure First Impression at the End
of the Interview.
At the end of the interview, evaluate the candidate’s first impression
objectively, when you’re not affected by it. Then compare this to your initial
reaction to the candidate. You'll soon know what triggers your first impression
bias and, as a result, be able to more easily control it.
10.Systemize it Out.
It’s hard to fight human nature. While all of the above
steps will help, creating a companywide system that ensures they’re all
followed by everyone all of the time is essential.
Allowing
first impressions to bias hiring decisions results in two classic hiring
blunders. The first, hiring people who make great first impressions, but are
not competent. The second, not hiring top performers who are temporarily nervous,
or don’t meet your expectations of friendliness and appearance. You owe it to
yourself, your company and everyone looking for a job to overcome the
simplistic idea of deciding who’s good or bad on superficialities. This is how
you turn frogs into princes, and some princes into frogs.
Lou
Adler
http://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20130903043750-15454-how-to-turn-frogs-into-princes-and-other-interview-and-dating-tips
No comments:
Post a Comment