Culture for a digital age PART II
Customers, customers, customers
Although companies have
long declared their intention to get close to their customers, the digital age
is forcing them to actually do it, as well as providing them with better means
to do so. Accustomed to best-in-class user experiences both on- and off-line
with companies such as Amazon and Apple, customers increasingly expect
companies to respond swiftly to inquiries, to customize products and services
seamlessly, and to provide easy access to the information customers need, when
they need it.
A customer-centric
organizational culture, in other words, is more than merely a good thing—it’s
becoming a matter of survival. The good news is that getting closer to your
customers can help reduce the risk of experimentation (as customers help
cocreate products through open innovation) and support fast-paced change.
Rather than having to guess what’s working in a given product or service before
launching it—and then waiting to see if your guess is right after the launch
takes place—companies can now make adjustments nearly real-time by developing
product and service features with direct input from end users. This is already
taking place in products from Legos to aircraft engines. The process not only
helps derisk product development, it tightens the relationship between
companies and their customers, often providing valuable proprietary data and
insights about how customers think about and use the products or services being
created.
Data and tools
Underlying the new
customer-centricity are diverse tools and data. Connecting the right data to
the right decisions can help build a common understanding of customer needs
into an organizational culture, fostering a virtuous cycle that reinforces
customer-centricity. Amazon’s ability to use customers’ previous purchases to offer
them additional items in which they might be interested is a significant
element in its success. The virtuous circle they’ve created includes customer
reviews (to reassure and reinforce other shoppers), along with the algorithms
that share “what customers who looked at this item also bought.” Of course,
Amazon has also invested heavily in automated warehouses and a sophisticated
distribution model. But even those were tied to the customer desire to receive
merchandise faster.
A unifying force
At its best,
customer-centricity extends far beyond marketing and product design to become a
unifying cultural element that drives all core decisions across all areas of
the business. That includes operations, where in many organizations it’s often
the furthest from view, and strategy, which must be regularly refreshed if it
is to serve as a reliable guide in today’s rapidly changing environment.
Customer-centric cultures anticipate emerging patterns in the behavior of
customers and tailor relevant interactions with them by dynamically integrating
structured data, such as demographics and purchase history, with unstructured
data, such as social media and voice analytics.
The insurance company
Progressive illustrates the unifying role played by strong customer focus. Progressive’s
ability to persuade customers to install the company’s Snapshot device to
monitor driving behavior is revolutionizing the insurance space, and not just
as a marketing tool. Snapshot helps attract the good drivers who are the most
profitable customers, since those individuals are the ones most likely to be
attracted by the offer of better discounts based on driving behavior. It also
gives the company’s underwriters actual data in place of models and guesswork.
This new technology is one that Progressive can monetize into a business unit
to serve other insurers as well.
Busting silos
Some observers might
consider organizational silos—so named for parallel parts of the org chart that
don’t intersect—a structural issue rather than a cultural one. But silos are
more than just lines and boxes. The narrow, parochial mentality of workers who
hesitate to share information or collaborate across functions and departments
can be corrosive to organizational culture.
Silos are a perennial
problem that have become more costly because, in the words of Cognizant CEO
Francisco D’Souza, “the interdisciplinary requirement of digital continues to
grow. The possibilities created by combining data science, design, and human
science underscore the importance both of working cross-functionally and of
driving customer-centricity into the everyday operations of the business. Many
organizations have yet to unlock that potential.”2The executives we
surveyed appeared to agree, ranking siloed thinking and behavior number one
among obstacles to a healthy digital culture.
How can you tell if
your own organization is too siloed? Discussions with CEOs who have led old-line
companies through successful digital transformations indicate two primary
symptoms: inadequate information, and insufficient accountability or
coordination on enterprise-wide initiatives.
Getting informed
Digital information
breakdowns echo the familiar story of the blind men and the elephant. When
employees lack insight into the broader context in which a business competes,
they are less likely to recognize the threat of disruption or digital
opportunity when they see it and to know when the rest of the organization
should be alerted. They can only interpret what they encounter through the lens
of their own narrow area of endeavor.
The corollary to this
is that every part of the organization reaches different conclusions about
their digital priorities, based on incomplete or simply different information.
This contributes to breaks in strategic and operating consistency that
consumers are fast to spot. There isn’t the luxury of time in today’s digital
world for each division to discover the same insight; a digital attacker or
more agile incumbent is likely to swoop in before the siloed organization even
knows it should be mounting a response. So the first imperative for companies
looking to break out of a siloed mentality is to inspire within employees a common
sense of the overall direction and purpose of the company. Data and thoughtful
management rotation often play a role.
Data-driven
transparency. Data can help
solve the blind-men-and-the-elephant problem. A social-services company, for
instance, created a customer-engagement group to better understand how
customers interact with the company’s products and brands across silos—and
where customers were running into difficulty. Among other things, this required
close examination of how the company collected, analyzed, and distributed data
across silos. The team discovered, for example, that some customers were
cancelling their memberships because of the deluge of marketing outreaches they
were receiving from the company. To address this, the team combined customer
databases and propensity models across silos to create visibility and
centralized access rights with regard to who could reach out to members and
when. Among other achievements, this team:
·
created
segment-specific trainings that offered an integrated view of each segment’s
suite of needs and offerings that would meet them
·
drew on information
from different parts of the organization to give a more developed picture on
engagement, retention, and the total number of touches associated with various
segments and customers
·
showed the net effect
of the entire organization’s activities through the customer’s eyes
·
embedded this
information into key processes to ensure information was accessible in a
cross-disciplinary way—breaking siloed viewpoints and narrow understandings of
the overall business model
Management rotation.
Another way to achieve
better alignment on the company’s direction is to rotate executives between
siloed functions and business units. At the luxury retailer Nordstrom, for
example, two key executives exchanged roles in 2014: Erik Nordstrom, formerly
president of the company’s brick-and-mortar stores, became president of
Nordstrom Direct, the company’s online store, while Jamie Nordstrom, formerly
president of Nordstrom Direct, became president of the brick-and-mortar stores.
This type of rotation can be done at different levels in an organization and
helps create a more consistent understanding between different business units
regarding the company’s aspirations and capabilities, as well as helping create
informal networks as employees build relationships in different departments.
Instilling accountability
The second distinctive
symptom of a siloed culture is the tendency for employees to believe a given
problem or issue is someone else’s responsibility, not their own. Companies can
counter this by institutionalizing mechanisms to help support cross-functional
collaboration through flexibly deployed teams. That was the case at ING, which,
because it identifies more as a technology company than a financial-services
company, has turned to tech firms for inspiration, not banks. Spotify, in
particular, has provided a much-talked-about model of multidisciplinary teams,
or squads, made up of a mix of employees from diverse functions, including marketers,
engineers, product developers, and commercial specialists. All are united by a
shared view of the customer and a common definition of success. These squads
roll up into bigger groups called tribes, which focus on end-to-end business
outcomes, forcing a broader picture on all team members. The team members are
also held mutually accountable for the outcome, eliminating the “not my job”
mind-set that so many other organizations find themselves trapped in. While
this model works best in IT functions, it is slowly making its way into other
areas of the business. Key elements of the model (such as end-to-end outcome
ownership) are also being mapped into more traditional teams to try to bring at
least pieces of this mind-set into more traditional companies.
Start by finding
mechanisms, whether digital, structural, or process, that help build a shared
understanding of business priorities and why they matter. Change happens fast
and from unpredictable places, and the more context you give your employees,
the better they will be able to make the right decisions when it does. To
achieve this, organizations must remove the barriers that keep people from
collaborating, and build new mechanisms for cutting through (or eliminating
altogether) the red tape and bureaucracy that many incumbents have built up
over time.
Cultural changes within
corporate institutions will always be slower and more complex than the
technological changes that necessitate them. That makes it even more critical
for executives to take a proactive stance on culture. Leaders won’t achieve the
speed and agility they need unless they build organizational cultures that
perform well across functions and business units, embrace risk, and focus
obsessively on customers.
https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/culture-for-a-digital-age
No comments:
Post a Comment