LAST-MINUTE TAX PLANNING
Taxpayers often commit mistakes in the rush to save tax.
Find out how not to make errors you will later regret.
The month of March witnesses some of the worst financial
mistakes as investors rush to make tax-saving investments. ELSS funds topped
the ET Wealth ranking of best tax saving options earlier this year. However,
though financial planners recommend sys tematic investing, less than 20% of the
total in flows into ELSS funds come through the SIP route. Traditional life
insurance plans don't yield more than 5-6% returns, yet sell like hot cakes in
March. When it comes to the PPF, even young taxpayers don't mind locking up
their money for the long term to earn modest returns.
How can
taxpayers avoid such mistakes?
ELSS funds are equity schemes that help cre ate wealth in the
long term. The category has generated 20.2% annualised returns in the past
three years and 16.4% in the past five years. But one must invest through
monthly SIPs, not put a huge amount at one go. This is especially true in the
current situation when the markets are at high levels. If you intend to invest
`50,000-60,000 under Sec 80C before 31 March, we would recommend that you put
only `15,000-20,000 in ELSS and the rest in a safer option such as PPF or NSCs.
You can in vest more in the ELSS fund in the new finan cial year, possibly
through monthly SIPs.
Taxpayers should note that every invest ment option plays a
certain role in the portfolio. They should choose investments that fill gaps in
their portfolios.Invest in ELSS funds if you are looking for equity
exposure.Also, choose an ELSS fund that matches your risk appetite.Funds with a
larger exposure to small and mid-cap stocks may be more volatile than funds
that have lined their portfolio with large-cap stocks (see graphic). Most
importantly, the three-year lock-in period should not be construed as the
holding period for an ELSS fund. Holding for longer periods could give better
returns.
Similarly, the PPF is a
good option for long-term savings.Though the PPF should be part of the debt
portfolio, younger people should not over-invest in this option. In most cases,
the monthly contribution to the Provident Fund is more than sufficient to build
up the debt portion of an individual's investment portfolio. Adding the PPF
could skew the asset allocation and drag down the overall returns.
NO
MULTI-YEAR COMMITMENTS
The other big mistake is to make a multi-year commitment without
fully understanding the implications. Life insurance policies require you to
pay the premium year after year, for the full term of the plan. You can close a
plan prematurely, but not without taking a hit. Insurance plans sell like hot
cakes in March as taxpayers buy them for the wrong reasons (see story on page
5). One should avoid buying an insurance plan in a hurry. Assess your need for
life insurance cover, your ability to service the premium for the full term and
your willingness to accept 5-6% returns. If all the boxes are ticked, go ahead
and buy the insurance plan. Otherwise, stay away from policies that combine the
triple benefits of life insurance, investment and tax savings.
Ulips is
another such multi-year investment. The new online Ulips are very different
from the pre-2010 policies.Their costs are very low, which leads to higher
returns for investors. Equity plans of Ulips have earned almost 12% annualised
returns in the past five years. However, this number only denotes the growth in
the NAV and the actual returns for the investor might be lower because some
charges are levied by cancelling units. However, these policies also require
multi-year commitments. Be sure you will be able to pay every year before you sign
up.
The only insurance policy worth buying is a pure protection term
plan. These plans only cover the risk of death and do not have a maturity
value. As a result, these plans have very low premiums. A 30-year old
non-smoker can buy a `1 crore life cover for as little as `7,500 a year.
SMALL
SAVINGS BEST OPTION
If you don't have time to assess the utility of an insurance
policy or go through the fine print, stick to the tried and tested small
savings schemes. Though interest rates have come down in recent months, small
savings scheme still offer 8-8.5%. The PPF offers 8% tax free, which makes it
better than bank deposits where interest rates have slid to 7-7.5%. However,
investors should be ready for rate cuts in the future. Now that elections are out
of the way, the government may cut the rate on small saving schemes.
Another option is the Sukanya
Samriddhi Yojana (SSY), but it is only open to parents with daughter below
10. Accounts can be opened at any post office or designated branches of PSU banks
and select private banks with a minimum investment of `1,000. Every year you
must invest at least `1,000 in the account. There is also an investment limit
of `1.5 lakh in a financial year. You can open accounts for up to two girls but
the combined limit cannot exceed `1.5 lakh. The account matures when the girl
turns 21, though up to 50% of the corpus can be withdrawn after she is 18. The
SSY offers a higher interest rate of 8.5% and enjoys the same tax benefits as
the PPF.
But there are restrictions on withdrawals and a longer lock-in
period. Like the PPF, the interest rate of the scheme might be cut in the
future as interest rates come down.The bigger problem is that opening a Sukanya
account may take up to 2-3 days and another 3-4 days for the cheque to reach
the account. Many taxpayers may not be able to beat the 31 March deadline.
For senior citizen taxpayers, the Senior Citizens' Savings Scheme is the best tax-saving option. It
offers 8.5% returns and the interest is paid out every quarter. The scheme is
for five years and can be extended for a period of three years once it matures.
The account can be opened in any post office branch and designated branches of
PSU banks and select private banks.However, there is an investment limit of `15
lakh per individual. Investors who have already hit that limit should look at
other taxsaving options such as PPF and NSCs. At 8%, NSCs offer close to 50-75
basis points more than what fixed deposits give. What's more, the interest
earned on the NSC is also eligible for deduction under Sec 80C.
WHEN
TIME IS RUNNING OUT
Five-year bank deposits score when the deadline is very close. They are perhaps the easiest way to save tax if you have a Netbanking account. You are not at the mercy of clock watchers in a post office branch, nor depend on a distributor. A few clicks of the mouse and your tax planning is complete.However, as mentioned earlier, this convenience comes at a very high cost. Interest rates have come down significantly and the best fixed deposit is offering 7.5%. The bigger problem is that the interest is fully taxable. It is added to the income of the investor and taxed at the marginal rate applicable to him.In the highest 30% tax bracket, the post-tax yield is close to 5%.
Keep in mind that the interest from such deposits will be
subject to TDS if the total income exceeds `10,000 in a financial year.Don't be
under the misconception that if TDS has been paid, you don't have to pay any
tax. TDS rate is only 10% and if you fall in the 20% or 30% tax brackets, you
have to pay additional tax.
Tax-saving fixed deposits are suitable for risk averse
investors, especially senior citizens who might have already hit the `15 lakh
ceiling in the Senior Citizens' Saving Scheme and don't want to lock money for
the long term in a PPF account. Though NSCs offer higher rates, many senior
citizens prefer to invest in deposits of their own banks because they get
better service than in a post office. Also, familiarity with bank staff is an
important factor for such individuals.
NOT TAX
SAVING ALONE
Some experts say that tax savings should not be the only reason
to invest in a particular instrument. The National Pension System (NPS) has
generated a lot of interest among taxpayers after the introduction of the
additional tax deduction of `50,000 under the new Sec 80CCD(1b). However, the
NPS is a retirement product and locks up money for the very long term. If you
are 30, the investment will mature in at least 28-30 years. Even then, only 40%
of the corpus will be tax free. Another 40% will have to be put in an annuity
to earn pension that will be taxed as income.
Financial experts also say it is better to pay tax than invest in the NPS to claim tax benefits. Their logic: NPS has a restrictive investment mandate and is not likely to match the returns of equity funds. They are correct only when the NPS is compared to equity funds. But when compared to debt instruments such as NSCs and bank fixed deposits, the NPS is certainly a better investment option.
ETW14MAR17
No comments:
Post a Comment