Thursday, March 16, 2017

SUSTAINABILITY SPECIAL .......Viewing the periodic table through the lens of sustainability

Viewing the periodic table through the lens of sustainability

The chemical industry has a long tradition of innovation that have made chemical processes safer, cleaner and more efficient when using raw materials and other resources such as energy and water. Starting from the early processes for making basic chemicals such as soda ash and sulphuric acid, the history of technological development in the industry is replete with examples of ‘greener’ and more sustainable processes.
The sustainability challenges for this industry has several aspects: the feedstock used; the products made; and the manner in which these are done. For the last several decades the industry has come to be dependent on petroleum resources (such as oil, gas and coal), or mineral resources mined from the earth to provide the basic raw materials needed for processing.
While tomes have been written on when the world will run out of fossil fuels and how a shift to alternate feedstock such as biomass is needed to migrate chemical the industry to a more sustainable growth path, less is known about the challenges of meeting the future requirements of several other elements that modern society is dependent on.

Relooking the periodic table
The periodic table is well known to chemists and engineers. It lays out the elements of nature (and some manmade) in the order of its atomic number – bringing to the fore commonalities in properties, including trends in chemical behaviour.
But the periodic table can be viewed through the prism of availability of the elements in the long-term and such an analysis is revealing as it turns conventional thinking on its head. First a clarification: unlike petroleum, the elements of the periodic table cannot theoretically run out, because, apart from helium, which can escape into space and uranium, which is fissile, elements are essentially indestructible. However, human activity is increasingly taking these elements from relatively concentrated deposits (ores) and distributing them so thinly in myriads of products and applications that they are no longer easily recoverable.
An effort to augment the periodic table to show which elements run the risk of becoming endangered was made in 2011 by Mike Pitts and his colleagues at the Chemistry Innovation Knowledge Transfer Network. This table shows 44 elements whose supply is at risk. For some, the risk is more serious than for others – but there are nine elements for which there is a possible serious threat to their supply within the next 100 years, and a further seven for which there is a rising threat due to increased use. Included are all of the rare earth elements, as well as rhodium, indium, zinc, gallium, germanium, helium, silver, and even phosphorus.

Rare earths
Particularly at risk are rare earth elements widely used in cell phones and to power ‘green’ technologies. Each iPhone contains dozens of these. Every new megawatt of wind power installed requires nearly a tonne of rare earth permanent magnets. The battery of the world’s most popular hybrid, the Toyota Prius, contains 10-15 kg of lanthanum (a rare earth) alone.
Though not particularly rare, the rare earths are not very economic to recover, as they are not concentrated enough in any one place. The Chinese have a monopoly with 95% of world supply, and have sold these metals at such low prices so as to drive other mines around the world out of business. As a consequence, the world is now almost entirely dependent on one country for all of its supply – a highly uncomfortable state of affairs, especially as supply has become ensnared with geopolitics. Interestingly, India has the potential to emerge as a sizeable supplier, as it is well placed on the minerals, but it has been unable to capitalize on this strength.

Helium
Helium is a surprising candidate for the list of endangered elements considering that it is the second most abundant element in the universe. But its scarcity is due to wanton usage and its ephemeral nature. The US, which produces 75% of the world’s helium and maintains one of the largest stores, sets prices for the element, and these need to go up, scientists say, by as much as fifty fold, to ensure the inert gas is used more efficiently and reserved for scientific endeavours like cryogenics and medical research.

Phosphorus
Phosphorus, a vital fertilizer for modern agriculture, is also listed as a potential future risk. Availability of rock phosphate – the ore from which most phosphatic fertilisers are produced – is restricted to just a few places in the world, with 85% of global reserves in just three countries, led by Morocco. As a consequence, the fertilizer is increasingly becoming expensive for farmers in the poorest countries, which has all sorts of adverse implications for soil fertility and agricultural productivity.
But the good news on phosphorus is that humans can take control of the phosphorus cycle and through not-to-complex technological intervention recover & reuse at least a portion of the element that flows out from animals via urine and faeces.

Rhodium
Rhodium is one of the rarest elements in the Earth’s crust – present at a level of just 0.00002%. 83% of the global production is used in the making the three-way catalytic converters that tackle harmful emissions of carbon monoxide and unburned hydrocarbons from automobiles. Other important industrial uses include catalysts for the manufacture of nitric acid and hydrogenation of organic compounds; as well as an alloying agent for hardening & improving the corrosion resistance of platinum and palladium. Annual word production of rhodium is estimated at about 16-tonnes, and at current patterns of consumption, there is just about enough to last anywhere between five and fifty years!

Indium
Indium, which is produced as a by-product of tin processing, is seeing a spurt in demand driven by its use to make transparent coatings of indium tin oxide for use in liquid crystal displays – which accounts for about half of global indium demand – flat panel displays, touch screens, photovoltaic cells, ‘smart’ windows etc. As it is co-produced with a basic metal like tin, which markets are growing slower, there is little possibility to ramp up production to meet rising demand. This makes for very volatile market conditions.
At the small levels of usage of indium in millions of dispersed units, recycle and recovery is highly challenging – technically and commercially.

Zinc
Zinc is the 23rd most abundant element in the earth’s crust, and its inclusion in the endangered list may also seem surprising. While it makes up an average of 65-grams of every tonne of the earth’s crust and commercially exploitable reserves are estimated to exceed 100-mt, its rising use implies that the world could run out in 5-50 years. One of the biggest uses of zinc – accounting for nearly half of global consumption – is for galvanizing of steel to impart corrosion resistance. In addition, zinc is used in a variety of chemistries and as a catalyst in the form of zinc oxide.

Tin
Tin has many important uses including its well-known use as a solder for electronics, and the lesser-known use for making coatings for metals to combat corrosion. In the chemical industry, tin is used as a catalyst and for the manufacture of marine anti-fouling agents. Global reserves are largely in Indonesia and to a lesser extent in China, and will be able to accommodate just another 15-25 years of use.

Recovery and redesign – new approaches needed
Remarkable developments in electronics and digital technologies are causing a substantial dematerialization of modern society. But this trend is counterbalanced by a marked increase of personal device ownership, most of which have a dramatically expanded use of chemical elements. Together, these trends portend cause for concern.
While the elements of concern will not disappear from the Earth, there will come a point when supply will be dwarfed by demand, or we will reach the point where it no longer becomes economically viable to extract or use a particular element for a particular application. Either way this has the potential to cause major disruptions in the availability of the many devices that we now take for granted and for several industrial products and processes, including many in the chemical industry.
One way out is for product designers to factor in these concerns in their innovation programmes and redesign products using alternatives that are more abundantly available. Far-sighted end-users, aware of the potential risks from restricted availability of endangered elements, will support such alternative technologies. Tesla Motors, to cite an example, has deliberately avoided use of rare earth metals in their all-electric Model S car.
Market forces – especially strong price signals – can play a role in expansion of the supply base (as has been seen in the case of shale oil), in developing substitutes and promoting recycling technologies.
Viewing the periodic table through the lens of sustainability is an exercise for the chemical industry too!
- Ravi Raghavan

CHWKLY 28FEB17 

No comments: