Saturday, February 9, 2013

MANAGEMENT / HR SPECIAL... APPRAISALS... In the Line of Employee Ire


 In the Line of Employee Ire 

The annual appraisal cycle can be a nerve-wracking experience for managers, especially when they have to deal with the unpleasant situation of being purveyors of bad news while handing out feedback and ratings. Unfulfilled expectations and careless remarks can lead to emotional outbursts and anger among employees. HR managers give tips on how to deal with this


Dreading the Arguments and Frayed Tempers
SAY IT STRAIGHT EMPLOYEES ARE looking for consistency and transparency in the appraisal process, so managers should state KRAs and performance parameters upfront and objectively, says Amrut Rat, VP, HR, at Bajaj Auto. At times, managers do not back the negative feedback with evidence, which leads to heated arguments and misunderstanding, says Mohinish Sinha, leadership and talent practice leader at the Hay Group for South and South East Asia and Africa. “It is important to convey behavioural issues based on concrete and objective examples and anecdotes instead of making personal, casual accusations,” he says.


How Much time is Needed to Talk About Performance?
AIM FOR BALANCE
WHILE IT IS difficult to put an ideal time frame for discussions as the issues each employee faces could vary, what is important is having a balanced conversation in the assigned time slot. A well-thought-out approach to discussions which keeps an employee’s career roadmap in mind can alleviate complaints of not having spent enough time. Sinha recalls an instance where a senior manager’s subordinate forgot to fill his form, and his ratings were communicated to him over SMS. The excuse given to him was that his boss was busy and knew about the work he was doing. The manager got a good rating but was disheartened as he had been looking forward to the discussion and felt he could not communicate his career goals.


When Promises Have Been Made by a Previous Manager KEEP IT TRANSPARENT IN THE MIDDLE of last year, a project manager at an investment bank was given a new team to supervise. She had to deal with an employee who broke down during discussions as she had been promised a promotion by her previous manager, which was later refused. The manager says she assured the employee that she will speak to the senior management about this but did not promise a promotion. “After getting feedback from the senior management, I went back to the employee and apologised on behalf of the organisation for the false promises. I told her she had management support and that what had happened was not fair,” she says. Setting quantifiable targets for the year ahead can eliminate vagueness and mismatched expectations.

 Talk Tough When Delivering Feedback?
FOCUS ON SELF-IMPOSED BARRIERS
IT IS IMPORTANT to talk tough with under-performers, but with the approach of helping and not humiliating them. The manager can deliver feedback by saying the employee could have added certain things to his or her profile and that there were better expectations from the professional. Anecdotes illustrating how the employee may not have paid heed to the preset expectations will help. “Managers shy away from tough conversations and to save face, blame poor ratings on factors like the bell curve. They should instead focus on delivering honest communication and feedback which helps the employees improve,” says the project manager. “Managers need to clearly communicate what they find lacking in an employee, the hindrances in reaching career goals and what they can do,” says Rahul Taneja, senior VP and head, corporate HR at Essar.
Don’t Meet the Employee Often. How to Go About the Appraisal?
COLLECT INFO ON PERFORMANCE, PREVIOUS RATING
IF YOU have not met the employee regularly before the annual appraisal discussions, it may sound like a dictatorial assessment, and the employee may not take to it too kindly. A disgruntled KPO employee in Gurgaon says his appraisal was done by senior managers who never reached out to him throughout the year. In such a case, it is extremely important to do preliminary background checks on the employees a few days prior to the discussion. Employees see it the appraisal as a barometer for an increase in hike or a designation and are hence very critical about it. “It is important for managers to spend time collecting information on an employee's performance and previous ratings a few weeks prior to the discussions before calling them for annual discussions,” says Hay’s Sinha.




What Should I do When a Star Performer Threatens to Quit?
HAVE A BACK-UP READY
IT HAPPENS all the time. A star performer threatens to quit when he or she starts becoming disinterested in the current role, feels the compensation is unjust or is just looking at netting a better deal with another offer in hand. Managers say it is best to remind them of what the organisation has done for them, and how their career has progressed so far, instead of promising something in a jiffy. “The idea is not to give in. A good manager will always have a second-in-line employee in case the top performer threatens to leave,” says a manager. The manager can consider revamping the performer’s role to make it more challenging and exciting, but if all efforts come to naught, the employee can safely be let go of.


Managing Expectations from Poor Performers
TALK ABOUT FUTURE GOALS & PLANS
CONCENTRATE ON future goals and plans. A director at a financial services firm had a difficult time dealing with an employee who was reporting to him through another manager this year. The employee had not performed as per expectations, but was expecting a promotion. The manager he was directly reporting to did not give him a satisfactory rating and the employee sought an appointment with the director. “The employee got extremely emotional and I had to turn it into a forward-looking discussion instead of what he did not do, to make him feel better. I also asked him, if he envisioned himself in a leadership role, how could he be so emotional?” The discussion then turned to the corrective measures he could take and the plans for him if he worked on certain parameters. He said he felt much better after some time, says the director. “I try to speak to my employees periodically about how we can work together and what their career goals are, instead of delving into these subjects once a year,” he adds.



Anumeha Chaturvedi ET130125

No comments: