Screwing Up Could Be Your Best Career Move--If You Do
It Right
A
screwup doesn't have to ruin your life, assuming you respond in smart and
creative ways. Tips for turning your fumbles into successful turning points.
I've admired Southwest Airlines for many
years, and I've cited them as a company with a clear focus, a vibrant soul, and
a culture you can see in all areas of their business and reflected in their
business performance. And as a ridiculously frequent business traveler, I made
them my preferred domestic airline many years ago. Given this and my
professional respect for them, it was a real honor to be invited to speak at
one of their recent management conferences. I appreciated their genuine
hospitality (I was hugged quite a lot), their pride in and love for their
company, and I was impressed by the investment they make in people.
At the same time, I had the pleasure
of getting to know the other main speaker at the event, Jay Heinrichs. He's an
author, persuasion consultant, and raconteur, and his energy and presence was
intriguing and unique. Southwest curated the content for their team and choose
two key subjects (and speakers) that were diametrically opposed in almost every
way. I spoke on "Designing Random Acts of Kindness" and Jay spoke on
"How to Screw Up." He believes there's much to be learned from
mistakes, mishaps, and screwing up, and given we live in a world where people
and companies are doing all they can to paint a picture of perfection, I was
intrigued by Jay's perspective on "screwing up" as a business
discipline.
After talking with Jay, it's clear
he's uniquely qualified, both as an expert on rhetoric, master in the art of
persuasion, and by his own self-admission, as a lifelong bungler. He admits
lacking any sense of direction whatsoever, and suffers with an extreme case of
permanent absent-mindedness, which according to Jay made for a pretty awkward
dating life. He thanks rhetoric for helping him overcome those handicaps and
despite himself has been married to a good woman for life.
His first significant encounter with
screwing up professionally happened when he accidentally misplaced a volcano.
Just out of college Jay was working at a conservation magazine, when Mount St.
Helens started smoking. He wrote an article about how this previously inactive
volcano in Oregon had suddenly become active. It was one of the first things he
ever got published. Jay didn't realize his error until an envelope with the
official Washington State seal arrived on his desk. Inside was a letter from Governor
Dixy Lee Ray, asking for her volcano back. Jay had screwed up and put the
mountain in the wrong state, a humiliating error for a budding journalist.
Frantically coming up with a solution, he walked into his boss's office a few
minutes later. Jay told him what had happened, showed him the letter, and
shared his plan. "How about buying a volcano--plastic, bronze,
whatever--and presenting it to her?" Jay offered. "No," the
editor in chief said. "A mistake does not earn you a trip to the West
Coast. But go ahead and find a volcano. Then just mail it." So Jay mailed
it. And some weeks later, he received a photo of the governor posing with the
volcano in one hand and his magazine in the other. They printed that with a
correction in the next issue. Jay's boss was so happy about the outcome that,
when St. Helens exploded sometime later, he sent Jay to write a cover story.
And that's when he realized that a screwup doesn't have to ruin your life. In
fact, if you respond in a smart way, you can learn from the mistake and often
turn a negative into a positive.
If you ask Jay who is his favorite
screwup story, he'd tell you it's Bill Clinton. He thinks the man made a
historic ass of himself. But in the spirit of "How to Screw Up," Bill
Clinton has been a master. Look at how during his challenges, he continually
shifted the focus to the future and moved on. Today, Bill Clinton has newfound
respect as he puts his exceptional intellect and statesmanship to work helping
to solve some of the world's most significant issues. If you ask Jay who and
what inspired his thinking on screwing up, he'd tell you in a New York minute,
Aristotle. Jay is an expert on all things surrounding his rhetoric and logic.
Aristotle wrote the original book on
persuasion: "Rhetoric." All persuasion books that have been written
in the 2,600 years since descend from Aristotle's ideas. He offers two
important tools that apply to recovering from screwups.
First, Aristotle said that the most
important tool of persuasion--even more important than logic--is
"ethos," which has to do with getting an audience to like and trust
you. The ideal ethos, or projected image of yourself, displays craft (authority
with the subject at hand, and an ability to apply that knowledge to specific
situations); caring (whether you're interested only in your audience's
benefit), and cause (whether you stand for something larger than yourself). In
a screwup, you need to present a workable plan to show your craft. Emphasize
that you're putting all hands on deck, doing whatever it takes, staying up all
night to fix the problem. That's the caring part. As for cause? Point out that
you have high standards and that you plan to live up to them.
Second tool: tense. Aristotle said
that there are three types of persuasion, each having to do with a different
tense. The past is about crime and punishment, about screwups that
happened--where else?--in the past. The present has to do with values, with
right and wrong, who's good and who's bad. Then there's the future, where you
talk about the expected outcomes of decisions and choices. Want to get someone
to make a decision? Focus on the future.
Jay got all that from
Aristotle--who, by the way, tutored a young lad named Alexander. Little Alexander
took these same tools of persuasion, created a volunteer army, and conquered
the known world. He earned himself the title Alexander the Great. If it worked
for him, and it's likely that it'll work for your screwups.
Arguably the Apple maps debacle was
a significant test in how the post-Jobs Apple would behave in a pinch. From
Heinrichs' perspective, Tim Cook handled the Apple Maps disappointment badly
because he apologized. People think they might want an apology from Apple, but
that's not really what they want. The iPhone 5 hit the market and the sheen or
invincibility of Apple was washed away by the negative press about the new
Apple Maps. Cook apologized for the lousy new application and instantly fired
Eric Forstall, the guy in charge of the maps, allegedly because he refused to
sign an apology. Apple's stock took an immediate beating. Had Cook applied
Heinrichs rules and emphasized Apple's high standards, mentioned that the
company had temporarily failed to live up to them, and then focused on how the
Maps would soon be even cooler than people imagined, the fallout would have
been different. Cook should have said that Apple is putting all hands on deck,
the most talented people in the world, to get it done. And he should have
hinted at what to expect. No apology needed. Shift to the future, emphasize
craft, caring, and cause, and watch the results change. If only Cook had been
as experienced at screwing up as Jay Heinrichs.
A couple years ago, Bank of America outsourced
100 tech-support jobs to India--and told the fired workers they had to train
their replacements in order to get severance checks. The bank got well-deserved
terrible publicity for this. How should the managers have handled the screwup?
First, they should have recognized their mistake and reported it to the press
as quickly as possible, explaining the outsourcing and giving the fired workers
their checks immediately. Second, they should have shifted the focus to the
future, promising improved efficiency and better service to customers. And
while the workers themselves deserved an apology, it should have been done in
private. A public apology only makes a company look smaller. Fix the problem
and focus on a better future.
As I got to know Jay Heinrichs I
couldn't help but think of how similar his name was to Henry Jay Heimlich, the
American physician who invented abdominal thrusts more commonly known as the
Heimlich Maneuver. This infamous technique has proven to be a highly effective
protocol when dealing with large lumps caught in the throat or abdomen, saving
the lives of many a grateful victim. I wonder if Heinrichs' Rules for a Screw
Up will become as helpful, and ultimately as famous for helping companies
manage significant mistakes and lumps caught in their system.
Here are the rules:
1. Be first with the news if you
can.
You get much better control of the matter if the bad news comes straight from you. Plus, right after delivering the news, you can show that you...
You get much better control of the matter if the bad news comes straight from you. Plus, right after delivering the news, you can show that you...
2. Have a plan.
People get over the shock of your screwup pretty quickly if you show you have a way to fix it. But don't wait to give the plan. You need to present it immediately after giving the news. Why? Because that way you...
People get over the shock of your screwup pretty quickly if you show you have a way to fix it. But don't wait to give the plan. You need to present it immediately after giving the news. Why? Because that way you...
3. Shift to the future.
Focus on what happens next. That's what Clinton did.
Focus on what happens next. That's what Clinton did.
4. Don't apologize.
This is the most controversial advice I give. Apologies come with several problems. First, they focus on the past, on the screwup, reminding people of what you did. Second, apologies rarely satisfy people. They almost always seem inadequate. That's because apologies are "self-belittling"--they shrink you down to the size of the victim or smaller. People often demand an apology more as vengeance than as any way to improve matters. Instead, you need to be in a position of strength so that you can solve the problem and get past the screwup.
This is the most controversial advice I give. Apologies come with several problems. First, they focus on the past, on the screwup, reminding people of what you did. Second, apologies rarely satisfy people. They almost always seem inadequate. That's because apologies are "self-belittling"--they shrink you down to the size of the victim or smaller. People often demand an apology more as vengeance than as any way to improve matters. Instead, you need to be in a position of strength so that you can solve the problem and get past the screwup.
Heinrichs
is the author of Thank You for Arguing and Word Hero www.amazon.com and you can follow him on jayheinrichs.com.
http://www.fastcompany.com/3005272/screwing-could-be-your-best-career-move-if-you-do-it-right?partner=newsletter
No comments:
Post a Comment