The road to seamless urban mobility
PART II
It’s not just
autonomous vehicles that would make the difference. Intelligent traffic
systems, advanced rail signaling, and connectivity-enabled predictive
maintenance would all boost network reliability. Seamless mobility could
improve performance on all five indicators that characterize a transit system:
availability, affordability, efficiency, convenience, and sustainability. It
could accommodate up to 30 percent more passenger-kilometers (availability)
while reducing average time per trip by 10 percent (efficiency). It could cost
25 to 35 percent less per trip (affordability), increase the number of
point-to-point trips by 50 percent (convenience), and, if AVs are electric,
lower GHG emissions by up to 85 percent (sustainability).
Setting the direction toward seamless mobility
The dramatic
differences in outcomes associated with these scenarios (Exhibit 2) mean that
cities, the companies operating in them, and their citizens face critical
choices. Logistics costs, employee productivity, and the day-to-day life
experiences of urban employees and customers are all on the line. To get to
seamless mobility—the most attractive but also the most complex
end-state—cities must do three things well: optimize supply, optimize demand,
and improve sustainability. Here’s a short list of urban transit priorities
worth paying attention to.
Exhibit 2 IN THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Supply: Capacity utilization
Cities can enhance
supply the traditional (and expensive) way—by building more roads, bridges,
rail lines, and other infrastructure. But they can also do so by using their
existing assets more intensively. Here are some tools they can deploy to do the
latter:
·
Paving
the way for AVs. Priorities for
enabling AV use range from simple-sounding ones, such as ensuring that roads
have clear signage and are in good repair, to others involving careful
coordination at local, state, national, and international levels—such as the
synchronization of insurance regulations, safety rules, data standards, and
communication protocols. The latter can actually boost road capacity, because
allowing AVs to communicate with one another enables them to drive closer
together, meaning more vehicles can travel safely on the same roads.
·
Automating,
and tech enabling, trains. Autonomous
operations and advanced signaling reduce the space between train coaches,
making it possible to achieve higher speeds and carry more people. This is no
fantasy: dozens of autonomous trains already exist, for both metro lines and
site-specific systems, such as airports. When Paris automated its oldest metro
line, the average speed rose 20 percent. Trains can keep rolling more
frequently through condition-based and predictive maintenance, which involve collecting
performance data and using statistics to identify and fix problems before they
cause breakdowns (reducing maintenance costs by up to 15 percent).
·
Deploying
intelligent traffic systems. These systems minimize wait times and maximize
movement—for example, through lights that sense traffic and communicate with
each other, as well as dynamic lane allocation, which shifts lanes to the
direction with more traffic. Such systems have reduced commuting times in
Buenos Aires by as much as 20 percent, in San Jose and Houston by 15 percent,
and in Mumbai by 12 percent.
·
Creating
smart parking-technology networks. Such networks connect vehicles to infrastructure
and inform users where parking is available, reducing the amount of time (and
frustration) needed to find a space. In San Francisco and Johannesburg, smart
parking has already reduced parking search times by about five minutes.
Demand: From private to shared modes of
travel
Increasing supply alone
won’t achieve seamless mobility. Encouraging people to shift to a widening
array of shared-transportation options and moving some traffic to off-peak
hours are also critical pieces of the puzzle. If people move away from driving
themselves to using rail, bus, or autonomous shuttles, existing infrastructure
can carry more passengers without increasing congestion—and maybe reducing it.
Demand-optimization tools include the following:
·
Creating
dedicated lanes for shared vehicles. If all the autonomous shuttles and buses that
enter circulation travel in their own lanes, they will be faster, more
attractive travel options. Cities such as Bogotá and Brussels have already
found this to be the case with traditional buses.
·
Scaling
e-scooters and shared bicycles. By shortening the “last mile” journey from a
person’s location to a rail station, these options make rail travel more
attractive. They are already correlated with increased public-transit usage in
Beijing, Melbourne, and New York.
·
Changing
the terms of trade. Shared- and
off-peak-transportation options become more attractive when individual,
peak-load options are less enticing. For instance, limiting the number of
robo-taxis and taxis, by way of a licensing system, increases wait times and
would make users more likely to select shared, autonomous options. Congestion pricing,
in which vehicles pay to enter busy urban areas at certain times, is another
option. Such pricing has already succeeded at shifting traffic patterns in
London, Milan, Singapore, and Stockholm.
·
Shifting
commercial deliveries to off-peak hours. Goods transport accounts for almost 20 percent of urban congestion. By allowing night deliveries, cities could take
stop-and-go commercial vehicles off the streets during the day. The concept has
been piloted in cities such as Barcelona and New York, reducing travel times
for all users by as much as five minutes.
Nighttime is the right
time: Transporting goods accounts for around 20 percent of congestion. In New
York, night deliveries move around 25 percent of delivery traffic out of peak
hours.
Sustainability: Congestion and air quality
Even with seamless
mobility, roads would continue carrying the largest percentage of passengers
and a healthy volume of freight. Improving air quality and reducing GHG
emissions, therefore, means dealing with the vehicles that move on those roads.
EV emissions fall sharply when they are charged with low- or no-emissions
sources; they are therefore a critical part of the equation. One tool that
cities can use to encourage the use of EVs is the creation of low- or
zero-emissions zones. Another is to promote the electrification of shared,
fleet, and government vehicles, which are used more intensively. Amsterdam has
already made special citywide parking permits available for
electric-car-sharing fleets, and Los Angeles International Airport recently
purchased electric buses for its operations.
In our view of a
seamless-mobility world, all robo-taxis and autonomous shuttles would be
electric and charged by no-emissions sources by 2030. This may appear
ambitious, given the baseline. Even in China, the world leader in EVs, only 30
percent of buses sold in 2016 were electric. As for cars, electric versions
account for a tiny share of the global market, largely because of concerns
about cost and range. However, because robo-taxis and autonomous shuttles are
likely to be used more intensively and frequently as part of fleets, the total
cost of ownership of an EV could become competitive with that of an ICE vehicle
by the mid-2020s.
A possible dream
Achieving seamless
mobility won’t be easy, but it’s not a pipe dream, because the advantages
associated with it are so clear. Moreover, seamless mobility could create
significant business opportunities. Our analysis suggests that by 2030, 40
percent of the transportation-revenue pool—the money that residents in dense,
developed cities like New York, Paris, and Tokyo spend on transit—could be
served by modes of transport (particularly autonomous shuttles, robo-taxis, and
those using logistics approaches) that don’t even exist now. Seamless mobility
may require new kinds of assets, such as storage and maintenance facilities for
shared autonomous fleets, fast-charging infrastructure, and dedicated AV lanes
equipped with vehicle-to-infrastructure communications and IT systems. All of
this represents a significant new area of opportunity for infrastructure
companies to design, build, and operate in and for new forms of public–private
partnerships. Seamless mobility is only achievable if cities tap into the
private sector’s capabilities, business models, innovations, and technologies.
Finally, the past
offers hope. Cities have reimagined transport before and did what was necessary
to improve the mobility, and thus the lives, of their people. Go back to that
first underground railway: London not only permitted eight years of
construction through one of the most crowded districts in the city, but it also
established a public–private partnership and invested £200,000 in what was then
a highly experimental project. “Those who devised and carried out this
undertaking would be entitled to the highest praise and gratitude of the
people,” noted one speaker at the ceremony to commemorate the opening. “This
line was not only an honor to the country but a solid advance in civilization.”
True enough then—and, perhaps, it will be true again in the future.
By Eric Hannon, Stefan Knupfer, Sebastian Stern, and Jan Tijs Nijssen
https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability-and-resource-productivity/our-insights/the-road-to-seamless-urban-mobility?cid=other-eml-shl-mip-mck&hlkid=1786ba082ce04883b46e5166954d7824&hctky=1627601&hdpid=b2b6c46a-a43a-46b0-b2b3-5efcf0ac5b7a
No comments:
Post a Comment