PHARMA
SPECIAL Digitization, automation, and online testing: The future of pharma
quality control
PART
II
For example, Biogen
plans to use this distributed QC method of real-time release and review by
exception in its new manufacturing facility near Solothurn, Switzerland. When
production starts up in 2019, the Solothurn facility will achieve raw-material
control through screening and genealogy, with minimal testing using rapid
identification and electronic data exchange. Bioreactor processes controlled
through in-line instruments will eliminate the need for process control
sampling. The new facility will have adaptive process control levers, lab
execution by recipe, and automated data transcription from all equipment, all
based on a deep understanding of raw materials, processes, and product
characteristics. The integrated control system allows employees to see data and
react in real time.3
As pharma companies
start exploring ways to build distributed QC facilities, they may be able to
pull in relevant technologies from adjacent spaces. For example, the PharmaMV
platform from Perceptive Engineering and the Sipat platform from Siemens could
provide the advanced process control necessary to enable parametric release.
Meanwhile, AI systems from companies such as Arago and IBM could allow pharma
companies to automate tasks that historically have been performed by highly
trained expert employees. (For a view on one company’s efforts, see sidebar,
“On the path to the future: How one company is exploring and adopting new
quality-control technologies.”)
Typical implementation pitfalls hampering successful
transformation and value capture
As pharma labs evolve,
they face significant costs associated with implementing IT and automation
solutions. Even expensive solutions can deliver a strong positive return on
investment (ROI), but many companies, unfortunately, struggle to capture value
from these digital upgrades. These companies typically encounter one or more of
the following pitfalls:
1.
Not
having a clear vision of what evolution horizon is the right target for a
specific lab. While most labs
can make a solid business case for the digitally enabled horizon, not all labs
have sufficient volumes and operational setup to justify automation and
distributed QC. For example, it could be hard to justify an investment in
automating a smaller lab where the potential cost savings might be less than $200,000
a year, whereas the same investment could quickly generate positive ROI for a
large sterile facility with significant environmental-monitoring volumes.
2.
Not
having a compelling business case for the transformation. Many companies start
implementation of costly IT systems without a clear understanding of the full
benefits such solutions can generate. This often results in delays in
implementation and the rollout of partial solutions. For instance, labs might
move to paperless systems on individual modules but still need significant
manual efforts to move data from one system to another. This can lead to
situations where analysts must record test results into a paper log before
manually entering the data into a laboratory information-management system (LIMS).
This manual-entry step prevents them from capturing the full savings they
should get from automating documentation.
3.
Targeting
a fully tested end-to-end future-state prototype rather than testing and
rapidly scaling up high-value solutions to capture quick wins. For example, schedule
automation and optimization can be implemented quickly and start generating
significant value even if a lab is not yet mostly paperless and fully
digitized.
4.
Lacking
proper planning or management for rollout of new systems and technologies. In extreme cases, it can take
pharma companies several years and more than $100 million to implement a LIMS.
Given such a lengthy time frame and the fast pace of technological change, some
of the LIMS capabilities are liable to become obsolete before they get rolled
out across the entire network. Pharma companies need skilled resources to
accelerate the rollout and should avoid the temptation to engage in excessive
customization at each site. A poor rollout can cost five to ten times more and
take three to five times longer than a properly planned investment executed
with good long-term planning.
5.
Not
having a full understanding of the capabilities of the systems they acquire. Pharma companies may purchase
a system such as LIMS to comply with data-integrity regulations without truly
understanding or considering the system’s potential to generate improvements in
productivity.
6.
Pursuing
automation rather than optimization. Scheduling automation can deliver 2 to 3 percent
of the QC cost savings, but automation plusdynamic scheduling
optimization can yield three to four times more value.
7.
Self-imposed
constraints from a perceived need to validate all systems and technologies. Many of the high-impact
changes, such as optimized scheduling and data-enabled deviation analysis, do
not require validation and refiling.
8.
Missing
the skill set to extract full value from their data. Most typical pharma labs do
not have the advanced analytical capabilities needed to get the maximum value from data sources. As a result, the labs collect data, but the data does
not get used properly to generate insights that could prevent problems or
reduce testing volumes.
9.
Spending
too little time and effort on developing a robust change-management program. Digital transformation
requires radical changes in mind-set and has major implications for the
organization and individual employees who must develop new skills and
competencies. To succeed, companies must make up-front investments in changing
the culture, winning buy-in across the business, and forging strong links
between business and IT functions.
How to get started?
The good news is that
most of the technologies needed to attain any of the three horizons of Industry
4.0 QC labs already exist today. Many of the technologies mentioned are already
being deployed in pharma environments, with some successful pilot projects
already completed and others in the approval stage.
To successfully
implement Industry 4.0 technologies, pharma companies need to set the right
aspirations and move quickly. Here are five things they can do to get started
today:
1.
Test several use cases
and technologies quickly to find the best ones for each lab type.
2.
Create lighthouse QC
labs to showcase the potential benefits of amalgamating these innovative
technologies.
3.
Find out which
innovative tools can have the greatest immediate impact, then roll them out
quickly across multiple sites. Don’t get bogged down trying to set up a fully
functioning lab with every possible desirable technology. Many use cases, such
as scheduling optimization, can be implemented before other elements (for
example, paperless labs) are in place.
4.
Establish a clear
target state and business case for each lab early on. Track the value capture
along the way, and reinvest the savings toward the next technological upgrades.
It is important to make an assessment separately for chemical labs and
microlabs, because the baseline cost and the impact of improvements may differ
significantly.
5.
Aim for the
highest-value horizon justified by the business case when planning and building
new labs to preempt the need for digital-transformation upgrades right after
the lab opens its doors.
6.
Start building the
needed talent base and skills early on. Clearly understand future capability
needs, invest in training high-potential employees, and invest in hiring employees
with the new required skill sets (for instance, advanced data analytics) during
early stages to enable faster scale-up.
Modern technologies can
make QC faster, more agile and reliable, more compliant, and more efficient. By
setting appropriate goals, choosing the right technologies, and scaling up
quickly, pharma companies can become QC leaders and reap the rewards in the
form of speed, compliance, cost savings, and productivity improvements.
By Yan Han, Evgeniya Makarova, Matthias Ringel, and Vanya Telpis
https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/pharmaceuticals-and-medical-products/our-insights/digitization-automation-and-online-testing-the-future-of-pharma-quality-control?cid=other-eml-alt-mip-mck&hlkid=0b415bdaf0a542fca1d46170163f2211&hctky=1627601&hdpid=139c1776-fae0-464e-9208-f47c40d547ca
No comments:
Post a Comment