Six lessons on how to embrace the next-generation operating model
Realities on the ground highlight what’s
really needed to pull off the transformation.
Companies that hope to compete in the digital world are coming to see that it
requires a fundamentally new way of working. On the customer-experience side,
digital natives have raised the bar considerably; for example, banks today
benchmark their websites and apps against companies such as Amazon and Uber.
Internally, despite big investments in digitization, process redesign, and
automation, the efficiency ratio at most large companies has stalled. Their
improvement initiatives reside in different pockets, such as a digital factory
or automation center of excellence, and are seldom integrated.
A next-generation operating model (NGOM) is needed to give companies the ability to
move quickly and adapt to changing circumstances. The rewards for making the
leap to the NGOM are significant: step-change improvements that produce 30 to
50 percent productivity gains, up to 80 percent reduction in turnaround time,
up to 10 percent enhancement of customer experience, and 20 to 25 percent
growth.
Last year, we
identified the two key shifts that are necessary for companies to build the
NGOM:
·
From uncoordinated
improvement efforts within siloes . . . To an integrated transformation program organized around
customer journeys (the interactions a customer has with a company) and internal
journeys (end-to-end processes inside the company).
·
From using individual
technologies and capabilities in a piecemeal way inside siloes . . . To applying them to journeys in
combination and in the right sequence, thereby achieving compound impact.
Over the past couple of
years, as we’ve worked with companies to develop their NGOM, six important
lessons have emerged.
Lesson #1: Start by working on a high-impact end-to-end
journey
Some companies start
their digital operations transformation with small pilots that don’t generate
significant benefits. Others spend a lot of time analyzing which journey to
tackle first. But there’s no single right way to get started. The key is to
identify a journey that’s important and begin there.
There are two primary
approaches for deciding where to begin:
·
If a “burning platform”
at the company is already in mind—an issue with potential to have a big impact
on customer experience, new-customer acquisition, customer service, and/or cost
and productivity—simply start there. Alternatively, identify no-regret areas
(every company has a few) and pick one. Set up a cross-functional, agile team
to tackle the chosen area.
·
If there are several
burning platforms, evaluate the potential of the next-gen levers across the
most important customer journeys at the enterprise level. This will help
prioritize and sequence journeys for the next two to three years after
embarking on the transformation.
Whichever path is
chosen, it’s important to get started quickly in order to demonstrate the from-to path
for the next-gen transformation and win over skeptics by showing the value the
model can generate. We have found that it’s generally better to take on
customer-facing journeys before internal ones. If it’s hard to get the buy-in
needed to begin with a whole journey, it’s possible to start smaller— inside a
single business unit or geographic site—and later extend the effort to include
the entire journey from end to end.
Companies have started
with a range of high-impact journeys. A North American bank began with home-
mortgage origination on an end-to-end basis. For a global property-and-casualty
insurer, the starting point was policy services; for a credit-card issuer, it
was customer acquisition; for a life insurance issuer, it was new-business
origination; and for an airline company, it was the ticket and ancillaries
sales journey. Companies in other industries have also applied the NGOM,
starting with journeys such as production of steel or restocking of store
shelves. Despite beginning in quite different places, all of these companies
experienced comparable results along key dimensions that drive costs and
revenue growth.
Lesson #2: Be systematic when prioritizing and sequencing
improvement levers
The NGOM integrates
multiple improvement levers—process redesign, digitization, automation,
analytics, and outsourcing/offshoring—to achieve step-change improvements. Yet
there can be complex interdependencies between levers. In some settings, for
example, applying robotic process automation (RPA) before redesigning the
process can be a waste of time. It’s critical to understand the
interdependencies and to be systematic in selecting the mix and sequence of
levers.
Use a structured
process to understand the potential of the key levers and the dependencies
between them. These can vary depending on such factors as the journey being
addressed or location (exhibit).
Exhibit 1

A vehicle-leasing
company recognized there were significant differences in the level of
sophistication of its operations in different countries, which meant the
applicability of levers varied widely. In one country, where capabilities are
less mature, it plans to implement a major process-redesign effort and then
centralize key activities, all as a prelude to introducing automation. In
another country, by contrast, where the processes are more mature,
centralization will be the first step, followed by automation. Another strategy
the company is keeping in mind is to favor early initiatives that can generate
short-term return on investment.
Lesson #3: Apply the next-generation operating model
across all steps of core journeys to get the most value
Often, companies start
by applying the NGOM in a focused way—for example, to a customer-facing journey
in the organization’s front end. But achieving step-change improvements from
the NGOM requires applying it from the point where the customer interacts with
the brand all the way through to the back-end systems that support and deliver
on that interaction. At most companies, 20 end-to-end journeys account for more
than 70 percent of the costs and more than 80 percent of the customer
experience. Transforming core journeys touches all parts of an organization and
requires spanning “horizontally” to cut across silos and deliver step-change,
multidimensional improvements.
We have observed two
approaches that can extend the NGOM horizontally:
·
The most common is to
start at the front end, with the customer-facing aspects of a journey, and
later extend the effort to internal processes housed in the back office.
·
A more aggressive
approach is to begin working horizontally from the outset, by assigning
responsibility for all aspects of customer-facing journeys, and the key
internal processes that support them, to cross-functional agile squads. In this
approach, organizational change happens before journey transformation.
One other important way
to realize true impact from end-to-end journey transformation is by creating a
new role: the journey owner, who has the authority to call on resources from
the multiple groups that must contribute to delivering on that journey. In a
bank, these could include the front, middle, and back office, as well as IT,
risk, and compliance. Because the end-to-end journey owner must engage with
many parts of the organization, it is a challenging role and should be filled
by a highly capable executive. The end-to-end journey owner should report to a
C-level executive: chief digital officer, COO, or even the CEO.
A leading global
financial-services company wanted to improve its customer-exception journey. To
break down silos within the business, it started by standing up a
cross-functional team with process redesign, agile, digital, and automation
expertise and representation from compliance, legal, risk, and privacy. The
team then focused on improving the entire customer journey. To enhance the
customer experience, it tackled the front end by digitizing its customer
self-service portal and improving existing interactive voice response (IVR). In
parallel, it redesigned processes to drive efficiency in the back office,
enabling future RPA opportunities. This “horizontal” approach, spanning
multiple parts of the organization, is on pace to deliver close to a 20 percent
reduction in cost of service delivery, a more than 35 percent improvement in
work efficiency and quality of service, and a more than 20 percent gain in
people-engagement scores.
Lesson #4: Start on the talent challenge immediately
Most companies do not
fully grasp their talent challenge. Not only do they need new skilled people,
but they also need to reskill or redeploy existing staff, since certain
improvement levers, such as RPA, will replace some jobs and transform many
others.2 Because these challenges
don’t appear immediately, companies tend not to focus on them until it’s too
late, at which point talent management becomes a bottleneck on their path
toward the NGOM.
Organizations need to
start preparing right away to get the talent needed for the future workforce.
The first step is to assess future skill demand in key areas such as data
science and agile, diagnose the current supply, and launch initiatives to fill
the gap. This requires HR to work closely with the executives in charge of
implementing the NGOM to gain a complete understanding of what the real skill
needs are.
Reskilling and
redeploying staff is a critical step in monetizing the valuegenerated
by the next-generation operating model. For example, a data- entry analyst
whose former work is automated could be upskilled to oversee RPA systems. It’s
worth noting that not everyone can be reskilled to the roles in greatest
demand; a call-center rep can’t be trained in a few months to become a data
scientist or an agile scrum master.
A global bank set up a
digital factory in a new facility in its home country’s leading tech region,
plus satellite digital factories in the tech centers of four countries where it
had subsidiaries. It built out the offices so they resembled start-ups and
established partnerships with university research centers and early-stage
fintechs to create a collaborative environment that leveraged the new offices’
locations inside larger tech ecosystems. Its recruiting materials emphasized
that positions in the digital factory were anything but typical banking jobs.
Lesson #5: Don’t let technology debt scare you off
Many companies are in
technology debt and believe they cannot achieve the full potential of the NGOM
without fully revamping their IT architecture and systems. But no matter what
the condition of their current infrastructure, companies can take advantage of
the NGOM by making incremental tech upgrades along their transformation journey
and so accrue significant benefits without needing to wait for a full system
upgrade.
Companies have followed
two paths in addressing their technology debt:
·
The first involves
building individual databases and applications, driven by specific use cases,
separate from the existing legacy infrastructure. This creates new
capabilities, which can then connect back with legacy systems on a case-by-case
basis, using application programming interfaces (APIs) and microservices.
·
Cloud and open-source
technologies now make it affordable to build entirely new infrastructure, on a
limited scale, to meet the emerging needs of the NGOM, while continuing to run
existing legacy systems in parallel. As this new, clean stack grows over
time, it can increasingly be used in lieu of the legacy infrastructure.
A large
financial-services firm launched an analytics initiative that relied on machine
learning, along with associated digital tools and process redesign. When data
from its digital customer-acquisition channels were fed into its existing
infrastructure, the legacy systems effectively broke. In response, the company
stood up new databases and analytics engines by deploying inexpensive cloud
technologies and open-source tools. These systems worked well, and the company
soon wanted to apply the new analytic models to its old data, which was housed
in its legacy core. To make this work, the company wired the new systems and legacy
core together with APIs and microservices. The company is now continuing along
this path on a case-by-case basis, using the gains generated by earlier
activities to pay for the next round of work.
Lesson #6: Keep evolving and adapting with continuous improvement
Our experience from
transformation efforts has shown that the 80/20 rule applies. The initial big
effort generates the majority of the value—the 80 percent. But the remaining 20
percent is still significant. Rather than stretch to “do it all” in one shot,
find the 80/20 balance, and commit to continuous improvement to adapt and
optimize the model.
To achieve the last 20
percent of value from the NGOM, a continuous-improvement mind-set should become
the new “steady state.” That means making agile practices a way of life, not a
project methodology, one that continually generates new ideas, prototypes them
quickly, tests them to obtain feedback, and then iterates based on that input.
Even after primary customer-facing journeys have been reconfigured, sizable productivity gains can still be achieved by tackling legacy
operations and corporate support functions such as finance and HR. The NGOM is not static. It must
continually evolve and adapt.
At regular
intervals—every three years or so—it’s also worth taking out a clean sheet of
paper and reinventing with zero-based design.3
Conclusion: Embrace the journey
Adopting the
next-generation operating model is a journey, and insights on how best to
embrace it are evolving. We expect to learn more as the journey continues. But
so far, these six lessons have consistently made a difference for the companies
that applied them.
By Tod Camara, Adele Hu, Alex Singla, Rohit Sood,
and Jasper van
Ouwerkerk
https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/six-lessons-on-how-to-embrace-the-next-generation-operating-model?cid=other-eml-alt-mip-mck&hlkid=09b116ca818b410aba2e020776c2eb72&hctky=1627601&hdpid=dbbaf2a9-b379-4866-a5e2-be34e3ba5a56
No comments:
Post a Comment