BUSINESS SPECIAL
Companies Move Out of Their Geographic Comfort Zone
There
was a fascinating article in the Wall
Street Journal on employers who are stepping
out of their comfort zones and looking for talent in geographic areas they
hadn’t previously considered.
By
now, readers should know the familiar and challenging arithmetic facing
employers. The U.S. economy has produced payroll jobs for a record 83 months.
The unemployment rate is at 4.4 percent. At the end of July, there were a record 6.2
million jobs open in the U.S. It
is hard to find people to hire for open positions.
Employers keep waiting for people to show up
at their doorsteps, willing to work at the wages they have on offer. This
strategy is becoming increasingly futile. Sure, people are willing to move for
work. And over time, the population does tend to flow to job-rich areas and
away from places where opportunities are scarce. But these flows happen slowly,
and sometimes they don’t happen at all.
There’s more to life than rational economic
calculation. People are reluctant to leave their family or places that are
familiar. If your home is underwater on its mortgage, it is very difficult to
sell it and move elsewhere. Many people don’t have much in the way of savings,
and it’s expensive to pull up stakes. Given the inability of companies to
guarantee employment for long periods of time, people are understandably
reluctant to move long distances for a job.
At the same time, many of the places where
jobs are plentiful — New York, Silicon Valley — put up significant barriers to
new arrivals. Housing is remarkably — sometimes prohibitively — expensive in
many cities. Accepting a job in certain metropolitan areas means committing
yourself to a two-hour commute.
Rather than simply posting jobs in their own
backyards and hoping the talent shows up, companies have begun looking to other
areas — in particular to places where the talent is either undiscovered or
underutilized. These companies are opening offices, hanging up shingles, and
generally establishing physical footprints in new geographic areas.
It turns out that a large number of people
are doing work in the place they choose to live (where they may like the
weather, or the low cost of living, or the quality of life) for which they are
overqualified — bartenders working in restaurants who have the skills to write
software, landscapers who would make excellent warehouse managers, ride-sharing
drivers who could sell mortgages. So-called underemployment, measured
by “the share of workers in part-time jobs who would prefer to work full
time,” included about 3.2 percent of the workforce in August, or 5.3 million
people. And that doesn’t even take into account those working 40 hours a week
or more for a lower wage than they may receive if they were to move and take
another job.
Just
because certain industries historically have not chosen to concentrate in some
cities doesn’t mean the talent isn’t there — to be hired, or developed.
The Journal notes that AvePoint, a software company based
in New Jersey, began to look for employees in Richmond, Va., an area with less
business congestion. Lynch Fluid Controls Inc., based in the booming (and
expensive) city of Toronto, opened a warehouse in Buffalo, N.Y. And a
mortgage company based in Irvine, Calif., has added scores of employees at a
new office in Miami.
Such moves, while perhaps counterintuitive on
the surface, can produce win-win outcomes — for companies, employees, and
society at large. Companies from high-cost, high-employment areas find they can
lower labor (and office) costs while still offering very attractive salaries
and full-time payroll jobs to people who are equipped to perform them. People
living in these cities can find greater economic security and the potential for
career development without having to leave home. And in age in which wealth,
corporate presence, and high-paying jobs are super-concentrated in a handful of
cities and metropolitan areas, this development represents a market-based means
of spreading the wealth.
As the U.S. labor markets remain tight, it is
clear that companies don’t just have to look outside the box to fill
positions. They may have to start looking outside their own zip code.
Daniel Gross
https://www.strategy-business.com/blog/Companies-Move-Out-of-Their-Geographic-Comfort-Zone?gko=fda48&utm_source=itw&utm_medium=20170914&utm_campaign=resp
No comments:
Post a Comment