The question of why we read and what books actually do
for us is as old as the written word itself, and as attractive. Galileo saw
reading as a
way of having superhuman powers. For
Kafka, books were “the
axe for the frozen sea within us”; Carl
Sagan held them as “proof
that humans are capable of working magic”;
James Baldwin found in them a
way to change one’s destiny; for Polish Nobel laureate
Wislawa Szymborska, they stood as our
ultimate frontier of freedom.
But one of the finest, most dimensional
inquiries into the significance of books and the role of reading in human life
comes from Neil Gaiman in a beautiful piece titled “Why Our
Future Depends on Libraries, Reading and Daydreaming.”
Originally delivered as a lecture for The
Reading Agency, an English charity devoted to giving kids
from all backgrounds an equal chance at the good life by fostering an early
love of reading, the speech was later included in The
View from the Cheap Seats: Selected Nonfiction the terrific compendium that gave us
Gaiman on the
power of cautionary questions.
Gaiman considers how the act of reading
changes us, “what it’s good for”:
Once
in New York, I listened to a talk about the building of private prisons—a huge
growth industry in America. The prison industry needs to plan its future growth
— how many cells are they going to need? How many prisoners are there going to
be, fifteen years from now? And they found they could predict it very easily,
using a pretty simple algorithm, based about asking what percentage of ten- and
eleven-year-olds couldn’t read. And certainly couldn’t read for pleasure.
Echoing
Madeleine L’Engle’s spirited 1983 lecture on creativity,
censorship, and the duty of children’s books,
Gaiman considers how otherwise well-intentioned adults might thwart the seed of
that life-enlarging and sometimes even life-saving passion for reading. In a
passage of particular urgency for parents and educators, he writes:
I don’t think there is such a thing as a bad
book for children. Every now and again it becomes fashionable among some adults
to point at a subset of children’s books, a genre, perhaps, or an author, and
to declare them bad books, books that children should be stopped from reading.
I’ve seen it happen over and over; Enid Blyton was declared a bad author, so
was R. L. Stine, so were dozens of others. Comics have been decried as
fostering illiteracy.
It’s tosh. It’s snobbery and it’s
foolishness.
There are no bad authors for children, that
children like and want to read and seek out, because every child is different.
They can find the stories they need to, and they bring themselves to stories. A
hackneyed, worn-out idea isn’t hackneyed and worn out to someone encountering
it for the first time. You don’t discourage children from reading because you
feel they are reading the wrong thing. Fiction you do not like is the gateway
drug to other books you may prefer them to read. And not everyone has the same
taste as you.
Well-meaning
adults can easily destroy a child’s love of reading: stop them reading what
they enjoy, or give them worthy-but-dull books that you like, the twenty-
first-century equivalents of Victorian “improving” literature. You’ll wind up
with a generation convinced that reading is uncool and, worse, unpleasant.
Gaiman then turns to the second key function
of literature — its unparalleled ability to foster empathy. In a sentiment that
calls to mind Rebecca Solnit’s inspired assertion that“a
book is a heart that beats in the chest of another,” he writes:
When you watch TV or see a film, you are
looking at things happening to other people. Prose fiction is something you
build up from twenty-six letters and a handful of punctuation marks, and you,
and you alone, using your imagination, create a world, and people it and look
out through other eyes. You get to feel things, visit places and worlds you
would never otherwise know. You learn that everyone else out there is a me, as
well. You’re being someone else, and when you return to your own world, you’re
going to be slightly changed.
Empathy
is a tool for building people into groups, for allowing us to function as more
than self-obsessed individuals.
In a
sentiment reminiscent of Ursula K. Le Guin’s electrifying case for how
imaginative storytelling expands our scope of the possible, Gaiman points to a third essential function of fiction
in human life — its ability to introduce us to different versions of the world
by envisioning alternate possibilities for the way things are:
Fiction
can show you a different world. It can take you somewhere you’ve never been.
Once you’ve visited other worlds, like those who ate fairy fruit, you can never
be entirely content with the world that you grew up in. And discontent is a
good thing: people can modify and improve their worlds, leave them better,
leave them different, if they’re discontented.
But perhaps the surest way to foil a budding
love of reading is to cut off access to books altogether, and there is no
greater hedge against that hazard than the library — that sacred place Thoreau
once extolled as a glorious“wilderness
of books.” (“When a library is open, no matter
its size or shape,” Bill Moyers wrote in his foreword to a
recent photographic
love letter to libraries, “democracy is
open, too.”) Gaiman recounts the formative role of the library in his own
life:
I
was lucky. I had an excellent local library growing up. I had the kind of
parents who could be persuaded to drop me off in the library on their way to
work in my summer holidays, and the kind of librarians who did not mind a
small, unaccompanied boy heading back into the children’s library every morning
and working his way through the card catalogue, looking for books with ghosts
or magic or rockets in them, looking for vampires or detectives or witches or
wonders. And when I had finished reading the children’s library I began on the
adult books.
Gaiman was fortunate that the librarians
tasked with nurturing his love of reading were the kind who inspire
poems and not the kind who tried to bar
pioneering astronaut Ronald McNair from his childhood library. With an affectionate eye to the librarians of his
youth, Gaiman reflects:
They were good librarians. They liked books
and they liked the books being read. They taught me how to order books from
other libraries on interlibrary loans. They had no snobbery about anything I read.
They just seemed to like that there was this wide-eyed little boy who loved to
read, and they would talk to me about the books I was reading, they would find
me other books in a series, they would help. They treated me as another reader
— nothing less, nothing more — which meant they treated me with respect. I was
not used to being treated with respect as an eight-year-old.
Libraries
are about Freedom. Freedom to read, freedom of ideas, freedom of communication.
They are about education (which is not a process that finishes the day we leave
school or university), about entertainment, about making safe spaces, and about
access to information.
Writing nearly a century after Hermann
Hesse’smagnificent
manifesto for why the book will never lose its magic no matter how technology evolves, Gaiman borrows a
prefect metaphor to substantiate his belief that books will endure in and
perhaps past the age of screens:
As
Douglas Adams once pointed out to me, over twenty years before the Kindle
showed up, a physical book is like a shark. Sharks are old: there were sharks
in the ocean before the dinosaurs. And the reason there are still sharks around
is that sharks are better at being sharks than anything else is. Physical books
are tough, hard to destroy, bath resistant, solar operated, feel good in your
hand: they are good at being books, and there will always be a place for them.
But Gaiman takes care not to confuse the
medium with the message — it is reading that counts, and its rewards are
medium-agnostic. He writes:
We need libraries. We need books. We need
literate citizens.
I do not care — I do not believe it matters —
whether these books are paper or digital, whether you are reading on a scroll
or scrolling on a screen. The content is the important thing.
But a book is also the content, and that’s
important.
Books
are the way that we communicate with the dead. The way that we learn lessons
from those who are no longer with us, that humanity has built on itself,
progressed, made knowledge incremental rather than something that has to be
relearned, over and over. There are tales that are older than most countries,
tales that have long outlasted the cultures and the buildings in which they
were first told.
These tales have survived on the shoulders of
people who have done their part to transmit them forward — something Gaiman
examined in his excellent lecture
on how stories last. He considers what it would take to uphold
our own responsibilities to the future — as readers, as writers, as citizens,
and as members of the storytelling species:
I believe we have an obligation to read for
pleasure, in private and in public places. If we read for pleasure, if others
see us reading, then we learn, we exercise our imaginations. We show others
that reading is a good thing.
We have an obligation to support libraries.
To use libraries, to encourage others to use libraries, to protest the closure
of libraries. If you do not value libraries then you do not value information
or culture or wisdom. You are silencing the voices of the past and you are
damaging the future.
We have an obligation to read aloud to our
children. To read them things they enjoy. To read to them stories we are
already tired of. To do the voices, to make it interesting, and not to stop
reading to them just because they learn to read to themselves. We have an
obligation to use reading-aloud time as bonding time, as time when no phones
are being checked, when the distractions of the world are put aside.
We have an obligation to use the language. To
push ourselves: to find out what words mean and how to deploy them, to
communicate clearly, to say what we mean. We must not attempt to freeze
language, or to pretend it is a dead thing that must be revered, but we should
use it as a living thing, that flows, that borrows words, that allows meanings
and pronunciations to change with time.
We writers — and especially writers for
children, but all writers — have an obligation to our readers: it’s the
obligation to write true things, especially important when we are creating
tales of people who do not exist in places that never were — to understand that
truth is not in what happens but in what it tells us about who we are. Fiction
is the lie that tells the truth, after all. We have an obligation not to bore
our readers, but to make them need to turn the pages. One of the best cures for
a reluctant reader, after all, is a tale they cannot stop themselves from
reading. And while we must tell our readers true things and give them weapons
and give them armor and pass on whatever wisdom we have gleaned from our short
stay on this green world, we have an obligation not to preach, not to lecture,
not to force predigested morals and messages down our readers’ throats like adult
birds feeding their babies pre-masticated maggots; and we have an obligation
never, ever, under any circumstances, to write anything for children to read
that we would not want to read ourselves.
We
have an obligation to understand and to acknowledge that as writers for
children we are doing important work, because if we mess it up and write dull
books that turn children away from reading and from books, we’ve lessened our
own future and diminished theirs.
Writing more than two centuries after William
Blake’s searing
defense of the imagination, Gaiman points to the same
supreme human faculty as our greatest obligation:
We all — adults and children, writers and
readers — have an obligation to daydream. We have an obligation to imagine. It
is easy to pretend that nobody can change anything, that we are in a world in
which society is huge and the individual is less than nothing: an atom in a
wall, a grain of rice in a rice field. But the truth is, individuals change
their world over and over, individuals make the future, and they do it by
imagining that things can be different.
Just look around this room… Everything you
can see, including the walls, was, at some point, imagined. Someone decided it
might be easier to sit on a chair than on the ground and imagined the chair.
Someone had to imagine a way that I could talk to you in London right now
without us all getting rained on. This room and the things in it, and all the
other things in this building, in this city, exist because, over and over and
over, people imagined things. They daydreamed, they pondered, they made things
that didn’t quite work, they described things that didn’t yet exist to people
who laughed at them.
And
then, in time, they succeeded. Political movements, personal movements, all
begin with people imagining another way of existing.
Gaiman’s final obligation is of especially
resonant relevance today:
We
have an obligation to tell our politicians what we want, to vote against
politicians of whatever party who do not understand the value of reading in
creating worthwhile citizens, who do not want to act to preserve and protect
knowledge and encourage literacy. This is not a matter of party politics. This
is a matter of common humanity.
Complement this particular portion of the
wholly magnificent The
View from the Cheap Seats with
Hermann Hesse on the
three types of readers, Ursula K. Le Guin
on the
sacredness of public libraries, and
Virginia Woolf on how
to read a book, then revisit Gaiman on creative
courage, his eight
rules of writing, and his philosophical
dream, animated.
No comments:
Post a Comment