How to Stop Sabotaging Your Career
Former Walmart.com CEO Carter Cast
discusses the different ways people inadvertently hurt their careers.
Are you the Captain Fantastic in your office?
That’s the guy who knows all the answers and never needs help. Or maybe you’re
a Whirling Dervish who tries to take care of everything, all at once. These are
some of the archetypes identified by Carter Cast in his new book, The Right and Wrong Stuff: How Brilliant Careers Are Made
and Unmade. Cast, a professor of
innovation and entrepreneurship at Northwestern University, venture capitalist
and former CEO of Walmart.com, explains how smart, talented people
sometimes derail their own careers. Cast joined the Knowledge@Wharton
show on SiriusXM channel 111 to talk about how to become more
self-aware and stop career derailment in its tracks.
The following is an edited transcript of the
conversation.
Knowledge@Wharton: The idea for this book came from your personal
experience?
Carter Cast: That’s right. I had a bad review when I was in my
mid-30s, which was 20 years ago, and was blindsided by the feedback. My boss
told me that he no longer wanted me in his group because I was difficult to
work with and didn’t follow direction. I ended up being put on ice at the
company and was considered non-promotable for about a year and a half. I had to
dig my way out of the hole I made. I was embarrassed and didn’t see it coming.
One of the reasons I ended up writing this book is to help people so that this
doesn’t happen to them.
Knowledge@Wharton: Did you have level of comfort where you were just moving
along and doing the job, then you suddenly got hit by this?
Cast: One
of the reasons I found that people derail is during transitions. They
transition to a new boss, transition into a new job, and they don’t stay
flexible and open minded and adaptable. I had a new boss who was much more
participative than my old boss, who was more hands off and let me run. I didn’t
react well to the new boss’ style.
Knowledge@Wharton: What are some of the most common reasons why people
derail their careers?
Cast: The
most common reason is an archetype I created called Captain Fantastic. This is
the guy with the sharp elbows who bruises you on his quest for the Holy Grail
of the corner office. Captain Fantastic has personal issues driven by
arrogance, ego and defensiveness. People just don’t want to work with this guy,
even though he’s smart and capable. Eventually, when his numbers turn and he
doesn’t make his quarter or his year, he finds that no one wants to help him.
Knowledge@Wharton: But more companies are organizing their employees
into teams to promote innovation, so being able to get along with others is
paramount.
Cast: I
think that’s right. The set of interdependencies now is so great with
globalization and with so many products having such a technical foundation that
you need to have an attitude of we, not me. Captain Fantastic doesn’t have that
attitude. That’s the No. 1 reason that people run into trouble.
A close
second is this archetype I call Version 1.0, which is someone who gets stuck in
their ways and isn’t adaptable to changing circumstances. With the rate of
change in technology lifecycles, none of us can get complacent with our
knowledge. We have to stay active reading from the thought leaders, reading
white papers, going to conferences. We’ve got to stay abreast of all the
changes that are happening.
Knowledge@Wharton: Another type you have identified is the Whirling
Dervish, who is someone who tries to do too much and gets overwhelmed. Tell us
about that.
Cast: I
have an assessment on my website where you can see which of these archetypes
you fit into, and this is the No. 1 self-claimed archetype. We’re constantly
bludgeoned with texts and emails, so I think we all feel like Whirling
Dervishes now.
Knowledge@Wharton: What is the most important thing about recognizing
your own trouble spots and accepting feedback?
Cast: The
most striking piece of research I found is that people who have an inaccurate
self-assessment, who don’t have high self-awareness, derail. They get fired or
demoted six times more frequently than people that have an accurate
self-conception. It’s not about thinking that you’re great at everything.
People who understand what they are good at can move around their weaknesses or
the fact that they have a vulnerability. People who think they’re good at too
many things or have a difficult time facing the music end up failing six times
more frequently than those with accurate self-conception.
Knowledge@Wharton: How are these concerns different in men and women?
Cast: The
most common reason that men derail is usually they’re Captain Fantastic. It is
thinking you have the answers, so you stop seeking the answer. Usually the
people who have the answer are on the front line of our business, closest to
the customers. You’ve got to get out of your office and talk to those folks and
see what’s really going on. Men often suffer because of ego, of thinking they
have the solutions without asking.
Based on
looking at hundreds of thousands of 360 feedback forms that came in about
people, the No. 1 reason women derail is being called nonstrategic, which is
ridiculous. There’s nothing inherently more strategic with men than women — I
think it’s really a problem with access and visibility. Women get in different
roles and rotated into enough roles where they get a vantage point of the
business that’s broad enough that they see how the different pieces fit
together.
Knowledge@Wharton: How does position in the corporate structure affect
behavior?
Cast: Different
levels have different derailment tendencies. If you’re junior, the chances
you’re going to derail are more likely because you have difficulty managing
teams, which is my archetype that I call the Solo Flyer. You want to do it
yourself because you’re comfortable doing it yourself or you know you’ll do a
good job. That’s not scalable, and your team becomes disempowered,
disenfranchised by that.
Mid-level
managers start to run into trouble by being nonstrategic because they haven’t
yet had a vantage point of different functions and how they operate and how the
whole company is interdisciplinary. In later stages, it’s the hubris. Senior
vice president, executive vice president — it’s being too far removed from the
front lines and starting to think that you have the answers. It’s that Captain
Fantastic archetype that hurts people
Knowledge@Wharton: You also mention that people have blind spots.
Could you explain?
Cast: I
love reading Joseph Campbell, who wrote The
Power of Myth. He said the best way you can understand where you’re
headed and how to look at yourself clearly is by journaling, so you can look
back at what you’ve written and see the themes that play out on a regular basis
— your fears, your vulnerabilities, what you want to do.
But he
also said there’s nothing like asking your friends, because those closest to us
see us more clearly than we often see ourselves. Go to the folks that care
about you, that want to see you succeed and just ask them for honest feedback.
“Where do you think I have a developmental opportunity that I need to pay
attention to in my career?” If you trust them and they trust you, they’ll tell you
the truth. It could be an area that’s a blind spot, like mine was this sort of
difficulty with authority figures.
Knowledge@Wharton: If someone has mastered a particular skillset and
relies heavily on that at the office, can that cause trouble as well?
Cast: This
is a really good question. At Kellogg, we talk about the leadership T. The
vertical part of the T is rigor and expertise. The horizontal part is
management leadership. A lot of students say to me, “I’d like to become a
leader or a manager.” Well, that’s great. That’s the top of the T. But you’ve
got to spend time at the bottom of the T to get the credibility and expertise
to get to the top of the T.
At what
point do you have enough expertise at the bottom to start broadening yourself?
If you do it too early in your career, like you try to become a general manager
right away, you probably don’t have the expertise to make the right decisions.
But if you wait too long, you’re pigeonholed as being a functional expert in
one specific area. The advice I generally give is that it takes five years of
deliberate practice, if you use the 10,000-hour theory. You should become
really proficient in marketing or sales or operations or human resources or
finance or whatever in five diligent years, then start looking for
opportunities to broaden your understanding of the business. But the biggest
mistake I see for young MBAs is they get impatient with their careers, jump
around from place to place and don’t establish that bottom of the T.
Knowledge@Wharton: What about young entrepreneurs? A lot of them are
fresh out of college and don’t have that leadership quotient, yet they’re
trying to build these great ideas from the ground up.
Cast: Entrepreneurs
are a different breed. I spend all my time with entrepreneurs as a venture
capitalist and teaching two entrepreneurship classes at Kellogg. You have a
founder profile for people that are going to be crazy enough to go out there
and start something from scratch. There is a genetic component to their passion
and belief in their idea, their risk/reward profile and their desire not to be
managed by other people, which makes them want to go out there and become
entrepreneurs.
Nonetheless,
they’re going to have this baptism by fire of realizing they have to learn to
be decent managers if their business is going to scale. That’s where it becomes
interesting. If they can make the transition from a founder to a true CEO as
the company scales, they have to learn a lot of these skills. Some of them make
it, like Bezos and Gates and Jobs. And some of them sell their businesses or
become the chairman and find a CEO to run it.
Knowledge@Wharton: Companies realize that losing employees is an expense
that they don’t want to incur. Does that make the leadership more willing to
help employees overcome obstacles that could derail their careers?
Cast: My
research found the opposite, unfortunately. I found that organizations are very
complicit in people’s derailment because we live in the age of the ‘[IRS Form]
1099’ employee, the free agent. It isn’t like when I grew up and IBM gives you
lifetime employment. I went to PepsiCo for 11 years and went through a series
of developmental training programs before I got my first line job. That day and
age is over. You have to take care of your own career because your organization
is probably not going to put down a formalized development plan to make you
loyal to them.
But what I
do say to organizations is, while you’re going through these annual performance
reviews that we all hate, make sure that half the time is on development. Don’t
make it all rearview mirror about what you did wrong and what you need to
improve on. Spend half the time looking forward and saying, “Where do you want
to go in your career? How can I help you get there? Where do you have skill
gaps? Where do you have developmental needs?” The chances are a lot better that
they’re going to stay loyal to you because they know that you care about their
personal advancement.
Knowledge@Wharton: What do you tell your students about career development?
Cast: The
first thing I say is, get in the habit of constantly receiving and asking for
feedback. Don’t wait for the performance review, like I did, to find out that
you’re viewed poorly by your manager. The minute you’re done with the
presentation, the minute you’re done at a big meeting, ask, “How did that go?
Tell me one thing that went well and one thing that I could have done better?”
The second
thing I’d say is, if you are in career trouble and you’ve hit a wall, finding a
career coach is really helpful. It doesn’t have to be that expensive. You can
use them for three or four sessions, and they have a lot of tools you can use
to help see yourself more clearly.
Knowledge@Wharton: For employees who are also entrepreneurs, there’s a
frustration with moving through the corporate structure to gain experience
while wanting to go out there and run a business. How should they develop their
careers?
Cast: It
gets back to your motives. Some people are motivated by autonomy. Some people
are motivated by achievement. Some people are motivated by affiliation. Some
people are motivated by a sense of purpose. If you’re motivated by autonomy and
achievement, and they are really strong drivers for you, you probably should be
doing something at a smaller company or being an entrepreneur. I’m motivated by
autonomy, so working inside of Walmart or PepsiCo after a while got very
frustrating to me. Try to understand your own motive profile. I talk about that
a lot in the book because sometimes one of the biggest reasons people derail
isn’t because they’re not talented — it’s because they’re in the wrong job.
http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/brilliant-careers-made/
No comments:
Post a Comment