Why joint families are back in urban India
Big fat families are not just
the stuff of movies. New realities like the need for childcare, support for
elderly and rising housing expenses are making many come together again
What does an Indian family
look like?
Mummy-Daddy kiddies in the city? Or a big branching family tree in the villages, with several generations living under one roof, as TV serials and Barjatyas show it?
Turns out, neither assumption is right. Recently released government data reveals that even as families are increasingly fragmenting in rural areas, more people in cities are choosing to live in extended families.Between 2001 and 2011, joint families in urban India grew 29%, whereas in rural areas they rose only 2%.
Mummy-Daddy kiddies in the city? Or a big branching family tree in the villages, with several generations living under one roof, as TV serials and Barjatyas show it?
Turns out, neither assumption is right. Recently released government data reveals that even as families are increasingly fragmenting in rural areas, more people in cities are choosing to live in extended families.Between 2001 and 2011, joint families in urban India grew 29%, whereas in rural areas they rose only 2%.
Then there are the hybrid
models -sub-nuclear units when one spouse passes or when siblings live
together, or supplemented nuclear, as when an unmarried relative adds to a
nuclear unit. Because of migration, support needs for the elderly and for
children, and the need to share resources, urban families are stretching,
joining and evolving.
Take the Bhatnagars in
Bengaluru. When Siddhartha moved to the city for his IT job, his family was
scattered all over India -his brother Prateek was at college in Chandigarh, his
sister Archana in Jaipur, his mother in their native Lucknow and his father
posted in Vadodara.After he got married in 2009, he brought his parents to the
city he'd made home. Soon, his brother moved there too, after he got a banking
job. Archana and her seven-yearold daughter have also joined the brood, and now
the family of nine lives out of a five-bedroom flat in Mahadevapura. “My wife
Pooja, whom I dated for a decade, knew my family and understood that I would
live with my parents, brother and his family -all together. She has also been
brought up in a joint fam ily. It was pointless to stay in two different houses
when my brother and sister-in-law are so warm,“ says Prateek. “We, my father,
brother and sister, pool money and use it to run the household,“ says
Siddhartha.
This tendency for families
to cluster in cities shouldn't surprise us, says Rajni Palriwala, sociologist
at the Delhi School of Economics.The rising cost of housing, the fact that more
women work outside the home and children need looking after, the vulnerability
of the elderly , the mutual support offered by a big family are all reasons to
stay together in the city. “We felt guilty that our parents were far away, and
getting older and frailer while we made our lives in Delhi,“ says Gajendra
Singh, who works in Delhi as a driver, and whose wife and parents live with him
now. His wife's brother also stays with them intermittently, while working
temporary jobs. “We eat together, live together, and it is a source of comfort
rather than a stress. My mother misses the hills and weather of Uttarakhand,
but she is happy with us,“ he says.
Meanwhile, for the Sahais
in Lucknow's Indiranagar, life resembles the movie Hum Saath Saath Hain.
Retired assistant superintendent of police Horendra Sahai, his three sons,
daughters-in-law and five grandchildren share a home. “My father is a cohesive
force -his ex perience and wisdom has kept the flock together through highs and
lows,“ says elder son Anand.
“There are disadvantages,
like the greater need to ad just or the absence of freedom (like just walking
out to get dinner outside, without a stated reason),“ admits his brother Rishi.
But the family says the advantages -shared responsibilities, help at hand,
healthy discussions and a sense of togetherness -far outweigh them.
Some families, originally
joint units, split because of tensions between individuals, only to come
together again later, like the Ghosh family in Kolkata's Baguiati. Three
siblings and their families live across five flats, where the youngest is five
and the oldest 72. “The bonding is so strong among the cousins that they can't
even think of living separately now,“ says Debalina Hazra, the daughter-in-law
of one of the siblings.
“That doesn't mean that
ideas of individualism, certain expectations of the conjugal relationship, or
women working outside the home, haven't seeped in,“ says sociologist Janaki
Abraham. People aren't necessarily living jointly because of love alone, but
also because it is a convenient arrangement, or they are materially invested in
the larger unit, as seen in many business families, she says. A large urban
property may not be easy to partition, she points out, compared to a rural home
with land around that can be easily divided.
“A lot of people
gravitating to nuclear families think that a big set-up will deprive them of
privacy. But then, they also crave for life of a gated community. The pull is
the same, except that here, it's your own family,“ says 53-year-old Imna Kumar,
who is part of the large Joseph clan in CIT colony, in Chennai's Mylapore
neighbourhood.
Meanwhile, why are village
households choosing the nuclear model? “One has to look at the whole economy.
As agricultural land fragments, so does the rural family that once lived off
it, with some share in the income,“ says Abraham. Then there is migration in
search of jobs. But despite the stereotype of the single male migrant worker,
many workers also migrate in pairs, says Irudaya Rajan, demographer and
associate professor at the Centre for Development Studies. The children are
often left behind with grandparents in the village, so that their schooling is
not interrupted. “One must remember that even if the rural family has to
separate, the ideology of the fam ily is often intact,“ Palriwala points out.
Migrant workers return home for rituals or at harvest time, there may be a
common budget as they send money home, so the move away may not mean a breaking
away at all, she says.
In other words, family
patterns in India do not follow the expected tracks -urbanisation and
modernisation do not break up the joint family , nor is the joint family the
inevitable form everywhere. The Great Indian Family doesn't make itself
available for single snapshots -it is a kaleidoscope of many shifting stories.
Reporting by Aparajita Ray
in Bengaluru, Shailvee Sharda in Lucknow, Saranya Chakrapani in Chennai, Swati
Deshpande in Mumbai and Haimanti Basu in Kolkata
TOI 16JUL17
No comments:
Post a Comment