3 Proven Ways to Make Tough Job
Decisions
We’ve all experienced having to make
a tough decision about the next step in our careers – between one role and
another at the same company, between jobs at different companies, or even
sometimes between completely different life paths, like remaining at a job,
going back to school, or staying home with children.
I’ve faced several of these
crossroads in my own career and, over the years, have tried out many different
techniques to help me choose the right direction. After much trial and error,
I’ve landed on three techniques that have made the decision-making process much
easier, and I want to share them with you.
1. The Grid
This technique is a classic that many people recommend. The idea is simple: create a grid based on criteria that matter to you, and then score your potential career choices against those criteria. Sample criteria can include anything that you believe is important, but common ones include the scope of the role, the people you’ll work with, compensation, geography, opportunities for advancement, opportunities for learning, and how worthwhile the work is. You can use whatever scoring system you’d like and weigh some criteria more than others, depending on which factors are most important to you.
This technique is a classic that many people recommend. The idea is simple: create a grid based on criteria that matter to you, and then score your potential career choices against those criteria. Sample criteria can include anything that you believe is important, but common ones include the scope of the role, the people you’ll work with, compensation, geography, opportunities for advancement, opportunities for learning, and how worthwhile the work is. You can use whatever scoring system you’d like and weigh some criteria more than others, depending on which factors are most important to you.
At the end of the exercise, you will
have a total score for each choice you are considering. But here’s where the
rubber meets the road – based on the gut feeling in your stomach, you will
either agree with your “final” score or you won’t. If you think, “Yes, that
feels right,” then you know you have your answer. If something doesn’t feel
right and you find yourself going back to the grid to add new criteria or
change weightings or scores, well, you also have your answer. In the end, your
gut will tell you which option you really prefer.
When I left Yahoo! in 2007 to take a
job as a startup CEO, I had three offers to choose from, and I used this grid
technique to help me decide which company to join. In the end, I chose the
company that was the least far along and most risky, and not surprisingly, it
hadn’t scored the highest on my grid. It turns out that subconsciously, I was
placing more value on criteria like how much I thought I would learn from the
people I’d be working with and the proximity to my house (since I had young
children and wanted to be closer to them) rather than the potential security of
the position.
And, in the end, it turned out to be
a great decision. It may have been a harder road, since the company, which
later became the Dealmap, was earlier in its evolution, but I learned so much
and built incredible relationships, and we were able to build a successful
company, selling it to Google in 2011.
2. The Conversation
The “conversation” is a decision-making technique that I recently described in an interview with Julie Bort from Business Insider. The concept here is that you can learn a lot about your feelings toward something by listening to yourself describe that thing to others– especially to people whose opinions matter to you.
The “conversation” is a decision-making technique that I recently described in an interview with Julie Bort from Business Insider. The concept here is that you can learn a lot about your feelings toward something by listening to yourself describe that thing to others– especially to people whose opinions matter to you.
Julie asked me why I chose to leave
a lucrative, senior position at Google earlier this year to join Change.org as
president and COO. After I explained all the reasons to her (an amazing,
world-changing company, an all-star team, big technology challenges, the
ability to add meaningful value to the trajectory of the company, etc.), she
kept drilling further, asking me how I knew the choice was the right one, not
why it was.
I thought back to a conversation I
had with my mother. She was initially skeptical of the decision, concerned
about the risks involved and wondering why I would leave a safe role with lots
of forward potential at a great company like Google. I agreed with her (and
other friends and family members who raised similar concerns) that there were
many good reasons to stay at Google – in fact, nearly the whole team that came
over with me from The Dealmap is still there and quite happy. Yet as I talked
more with my mother, I could hear myself trying to win her over, explaining why
I thought joining Change.org was such a great fit for me.
In listening to myself try to
convince her, it became very clear to me that this was what I really wanted. Similar
to the Grid, where your gut will tell you the answer regardless of your final
score, the Conversation works the same way: talk with people you trust, and
you’ll know what your heart is telling you by listening to whether you’re
agreeing with those people or are trying to shift their opinions. (And yes, in
case you are wondering, my mother is now fully supportive of my role at
Change.org and all that our company is working to achieve!)
3. The 'Sit With'
The third technique is one I’ve used not only for job decisions but for other life decisions as well. The concept here is to imagine yourself actually in the position you are considering, ideally for several days at a minimum, to see how it feels to you.
The third technique is one I’ve used not only for job decisions but for other life decisions as well. The concept here is to imagine yourself actually in the position you are considering, ideally for several days at a minimum, to see how it feels to you.
My dear friend Rebecca
Macieira-Kaufmann, CEO of Banamex USA and formerly president of Citibank
California, calls this the “Sit With.” She says that she will sit withthe idea
of something, imaging it is reality for several days or even weeks, before she
decides to do it. I have used this technique myself, both for work-related
decisions (like when I decided between job offers in consulting, brand
management, and technology coming out of business school) and for life
decisions (like deciding whether to make an offer on a house).
For work examples, you can do simple
things like imagine yourself handing someone a business card with a different
title or company on it, updating your LinkedIn profile with the new
information, or introducing yourself to someone new by telling them about your
new job. How do you feel? Are you excited to tell more people? Or do you not
want to talk about it? How you feel during your Sit With will speak volumes
about which choice you should make in real life.
The key to using the Sit With is to
imagine only one option at a time. Really living as if you have made the choice
already is the way this technique works best. When I used The Sit With to
decide whether we wanted to put an offer in on a house, I literally drove
“home” to that house every day for at least a week to see what it felt like.
And I got more excited each day thinking that this house could become my home.
As you can probably tell, each of
these three techniques – the Grid, the Conversation, and the Sit With – zeros
in on one key element: your heart. They are each tricks to connect you more
closely to what you likely already know inside – and it’s that internal
knowledge that really tells you which choice is right for you.
I’d love to hear any other tips and
tricks you have used for making tough decisions. Please leave your thoughts in
the comments.
– Jennifer Dulski
http://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20131007180055-407452-3-proven-ways-to-make-tough-job-decisions
No comments:
Post a Comment