Culture and the Chief Executive
CEOs
are stepping up to a new role, as leaders of their company’s thinking and
behavior.
It is striking to see how many chief
executives see their most important responsibility as being the leader of the
company’s culture. According to Ginni Rometty, CEO of IBM, “Culture is your
company’s number one asset.” Her counterpart at Microsoft, Steve Ballmer, has
said, “Everything I do is a reinforcement or not of what we want to have happen
culturally.” In another typical remark from the C-suite, Starbucks
Corporation CEO Howard Schultz has written that “so much of what Starbucks
achieved was because of [its employees] and the culture they fostered.”
Researchers such as former Harvard Business School professors John Kotter and
James Heskett have also found consistent correlation between robust, engaged
cultures and high-performance business results (as described in their book, Corporate
Culture and Performance [Free Press, 1992]). But most business leaders
don’t need that evidence; they’ve seen plenty of correlation in their own
workplace every day.
Recognizing the importance of
culture in business is not the same thing as being an effective cultural chief
executive. The CEO is the most visible leader in a company. His or her direct
engagement in all facets of the company’s culture can make an enormous
difference, not just in how people feel about the company, but in how they
perform. Schultz described the CEO’s role this way in his book Onward: How
Starbucks Fought for Its Life without Losing Its Soul (Rodale Books, 2012):
“Like crafting the perfect cup of coffee, creating an engaging,
respectful, trusting workplace culture is not the result of any one thing. It’s
a combination of intent, process, and heart, a trio that must
constantly be fine-tuned.”
A company’s culture is the
collection of self-sustaining patterns of behaving, feeling, thinking, and believing,
the patterns that determine “the way we do things around here.” At its best, an
organization’s culture is an immense source of value. It enables, energizes,
and enhances its employees and thus fosters ongoing high performance. At its
worst, the culture can be a drag on productivity and emotional commitment,
undermining long-term success. Most companies are so large and complex that the
culture acts in both ways at once. Indeed, the culture of a large company is
typically made up of several interwoven subcultures, all affecting and
responding to one another.
If you are the chief executive of a
company that is sailing with the wind and leading in its competitive race,
that’s a sign that your culture is in sync with your strategy. This makes your
company much more likely to deliver consistent and attractive profitability and
growth results. You can tell you have such a culture because people are
confident and energized. They can justifiably take pride in the results of
their work. As CEO, your role is to keep the ship on course and ahead of the
competition. This requires generating regular behavioral reminders about the
values, aspirations, and engagements that underlie your company’s success and
reinforce its strategy.
However, if your company is heading
into stormy waters, facing the kinds of disruptive competition or unexpected
market changes that affect every industry sooner or later, then a program of
normal reinforcing leadership won’t cut it. A culture that no longer aligns
with your strategic and performance priorities needs a lot more attention—from
you and other senior leaders.
Many CEOs understand in principle
that cultures are multidimensional, slow to change, and troublesome to
control—and thus that influencing them requires care and thoughtful engagement.
This is particularly true for global companies led by people of diverse
backgrounds. When confronted with a cultural challenge in real life, however,
chief executives tend to forget this principle. Instead, they revert to
conventional managerial tactics, but with more rigor. They turn up the volume
on the inspirational messages. They raise the bar and set stretch goals with
new statements of the vision, mission, values, and purpose of the company. They
bear down on costs and castigate people for complacency. They may also see
culture change as primarily a functional responsibility, to be delegated to
experts, either inside or outside the company. More often than not, these
approaches leave the deeply embedded cultural behaviors largely unchanged. Only
an enlightened CEO can break through that kind of cultural inertia.
A better starting point is a
realistic recognition of the culture’s current status. No company’s collective
practices and beliefs are all good or all bad. They have evolved over time for
understandable reasons—often to deal with the challenges or malfunctions of the
past. Moreover, they are firmly entrenched in mind-sets and habits. Therefore,
it is essential to be rigorously selective and disciplined in dealing with
cultural issues. There are several things you can do from your highly visible
position at the top of the hierarchy to spark and foster the cultural
realignments you want to see:
- Demonstrate positive urgency by focusing on your company’s aspirations—its unfulfilled potential—rather than on any impending crisis.
- Pick a critical few behaviors that exemplify the best of your company and culture, and that you want everyone to adopt. Set an example by visibly adopting a couple of these behaviors yourself.
- Balance your appeals to the company to include both rational and emotional cues.
- Make the change sustainable by maintaining vigilance on the few critical elements that you have established as important.
In all this activity, avoid
delegating your culture-oriented actions. Do as much as you can yourself.
The
Power of Positive Urgency
Time and again, we hear executives
cite the importance of having a “burning platform”—a stress-producing crisis,
whether externally driven or self-induced—to incite a high-performance culture.
We once observed a CEO incur several hundred million dollars of unnecessary
debt for the sole purpose of creating a sense of urgency for his culture change
effort. For many years, we too subscribed to the conventional wisdom that
burning platforms were the only way to obtain cultural impact. But no longer.
Certainly we understand the logic
that underlies this point of view: Companies full of complacent people will
rouse themselves only in response to crisis. But experience and common sense
argue differently. Consider what people on real burning platforms do. They
escape. They barely have time to act, much less change their mind-sets and
habits with a view toward long-term success. In the business equivalent, which
usually involves a rapid drain of cash and profitability, your options will be
similarly limited—in this case, to layoffs, plant closures, responses to the
press and investors, and other forms of damage control. Like BP’s recovery
efforts after the Deepwater Horizon spill, Toyota’s after the Fukushima disaster,
or any plant shutdown made in response to a sudden loss of business, these
traumatic activities are typically seen as a one-time event, not as a way of
building for the future.
There is a much better way to
overcome complacency. As a CEO or senior executive, the greatest thing you can
do is to marshal an authentic sense of urgency, but not one built solely on the
logical reasons that change is necessary. Rather, build an emotional sense of
urgency, focusing on the values that the company cares about collectively: its
way of serving customers, its desire for growth and success, its positive
impact on social and community issues, and the attraction and welcome that
people felt when they first arrived.
Every sustainable company culture is
based, in part, on this intrinsic attraction to the work—including the way it
challenges people. At some point, your employees chose to be part of the
enterprise. For the most part, they liked (or loved) their profession, they
felt they could excel, and they wanted to gain the personal benefits of
accomplishment. As CEO, you need to capitalize on those feelings, give them
voice, and encourage people to spread them virally throughout the company. This
may mean discarding some businesses that don’t fit your strategy, your capabilities,
or your culture. But it will also mean helping people expand (or recapture) the
pride they have felt, all along, in their collective strength.
The
Right Behaviors
To help people capitalize on the
best aspects of your culture, you have to focus attention on the critical few
behaviors that you believe matter most. These are a few positive sources of
energy, pride, and interactions that, when nurtured and spread to scale, will
improve company performance significantly. As simple as it sounds, this approach
will not only accelerate the behavior change that matters most, but also evolve
and align your culture more effectively than forcing a major and potentially
disruptive culture change effort on a broadly diverse global organization.
These actions are ideally small but
repetitive and demonstrably significant. They signal where the company is going
now. For example, early in the General Motors Company (GM) bankruptcy recovery
effort of 2009, interim CEO Fritz Henderson and a handful of his senior executives
launched a series of informal conversations with frontline leaders, skipping
all the levels of the hierarchy in between. These examples triggered dozens of
imitations, including conversations with customers, among GM employees across
North America. Similarly, during a turnaround at the Mobil Corporation in the
mid-1990s, then CEO Lucio Noto and five of his senior leaders personally
conducted career appraisals of people at various levels whom they saw as
“managerial bench strength.” This inspired similar assessment efforts
throughout the company. Southwest Airlines, for its part, has continually
singled out the same three behaviors: hiring people who connect emotionally
with customers and colleagues, volunteering when help is needed at any level,
and frugality to the extreme.
Unfortunately, there is no magic
formula for finding the right few behaviors that will make a difference in your
culture. There are, however, some factors to consider.
First, it is essential to emulate at
least some of these emerging key behaviors yourself—to be a living model of the
culture you aspire to lead. People pay rapt attention to what the CEO does, not
just what the CEO says. You can’t rely on communications, no matter how
inspiring. You, and ideally a few other senior leaders, have to step out by
behaving in new ways that both capitalize on elements in the current culture
and demonstrate a key shift in cultural alignment.
No two senior leaders are alike;
what works for one doesn’t necessarily work for another. So do not seek to
revamp your leadership philosophy, style, or personality to fit anyone else’s
idea of what a leader should be. Instead, as former Campbell Soup Company CEO
Douglas Conant put it, “It’s hard for leaders to realize that it’s not about
showing up ‘the way I think I’m supposed to show up.’ It’s about showing up in a way that is
‘authentically me’ and can be helpful” (see “The Thought Leader Interview: Douglas Conant,” by Art Kleiner, s+b, Autumn 2012, with
video interview by Jon Katzenbach [online only]; the videos are embedded on
this page, below).
When Conant first arrived as CEO at
Campbell’s, the company was beleaguered by poor quality and newly fierce
competitors; he was hired to turn the company around. He knew he was not a
master of social conviviality. “Every time I take a Myers-Briggs test,” said
Conant, “it shows I’m an introvert.” He knew it would not be easy for him to
interact comfortably with a diversity of people throughout the organization,
but he had to find a way to do it.
At the time, the Campbell’s “people
strategy” emphasized employee health, using an American Heart Association
program that encouraged people to walk 10,000 steps every day. So Conant began
donning a track suit and pedometer and running around the headquarters building
complex in Camden, N.J., every day. Because of his constantly changing
schedule, he ran at different times every day, and he made a point of running
through different parts of the complex. People never knew when they would see
him jogging nearby, but they always knew the reason—he wasn’t checking up on
them, he was just getting his 10,000 steps in. This practice gave an introvert
a highly visible, easy way to interact informally with people he would
otherwise see only at formal meetings, and Conant’s running soon slowed to a
walk. “It got to the point where I was so comfortable that people weren’t
afraid of approaching me,” he said. He eventually dubbed this practice
“management by wandering around.”
You do not need very many senior
leaders to start a few critical behaviors rolling through the company. Get
several well-known executives to step away from the norms of the past with you.
People throughout the workforce will rapidly take notice and do the same,
creating an atmosphere of approval and support. In short, by seeking out other
early adopters of these behaviors, and working with them directly to sharpen
their influence and deploy it more effectively, you will gain far more leverage
as a cultural leader.
For example, when Lucio Noto created
those new, informal “skip level” staff development opportunities at Mobil, the
rumor mill took notice. People all through the company began to do the same.
These career appraisals became common practice at multiple levels across the
globe. Similarly, when Michael Sabia was CEO of Bell Canada, he started
attending small-group working sessions of “master motivators” at the front
line, and other executives followed suit. They wanted to see for themselves what
he was learning.
Rational
and Emotional Impact
More than 100 years ago, Mary Parker
Follett wrote about integration in leadership and organizational situations.
She contrasted integration with domination (“a victory of one side over the
other”) and compromise (“each side gives up [some of what it wants] in order to
have peace”). Integration comes about when “there is no curtailing of
desire”—both sides in a dispute get all (or nearly all) of what they really
wish for. We have yet to hear a better definition for the kind of integration
that a CEO needs if he or she is to have impact on the culture.
When putting together a business
strategy or a case for action, it’s important to integrate the rational
arguments from top leaders with compelling emotional appeals at more personal
levels. One without the other is unlikely to sustain cultural alignment. In
other words, in addition to a rational business case for change and other
formal mechanisms, it’s important to develop emotional impact through such
forces as peer approval, the support of colleagues, and the admiration of
friends and families.
For most business leaders, a
rationally compelling argument is usually much easier to develop than an
emotionally compelling one. Executives are used to quantitative analysis and
logical reasoning. They understand how to send arguments through
well-established formal channels and programs, and they know how to delegate
assignments within that system. But emotional energy gets its strength from
one’s own intuitive insight and the social support of colleagues. This energy
flows through informal networks and cross-organizational interactions outside
formal channels. The CEO’s role is to ensure integration of the formal and
informal dimensions, so that the emotional energy generated for change is
reinforced by a consistent formal accountability for performance and a
willingness to pay attention to the metrics that indicate results.
Douglas Conant calls this being
“tough-minded on standards but tender-hearted with people.” Early on in his
turnaround challenge at Campbell’s, he realized that he would have to replace
more than 300 of the top 350 people in the company because they lacked the
necessary skills. In discussions and informal conversations, he held firm to
this decision, but also openly acknowledged that those who were being replaced
were the friends, colleagues, and teammates of those who were staying. Those
leaving were treated with respect and given as much help as the company could
afford. “Even through that horrible period,” he later recalled, “our employee
engagement scores went up.”
Eternal
but Focused Vigilance
Your role as a cultural leader
starts on Day One of your appointment as CEO. It will not end until the last
day you hold that office. Indeed, your persistence in emphasizing the right
cultural behavior will continue to be influential after you have left.
Because cultures evolve in informal
ways that are hard to track, they can easily degrade before many people are
even aware something bad is happening. Chief executives in peak-performing
companies almost never let this happen; they work hard to keep an eye on the
critical few behaviors over time. You can either keep promoting the same few
behaviors, as Southwest Airlines did, or, after the first few have taken hold,
pick a few more to model and support.
In many great organizations, a kind
of cultural vigilance baton is passed from each CEO to his or her successor. At
Southwest Airlines, for example, it passed seamlessly from cofounder Herb
Kelleher to incoming CEO James Parker and president Colleen Barrett in 2001,
and then to incoming CEO Gary C. Kelly in 2004. Each new chief executive
is deliberately charged with keeping the company’s fundamental cultural
identity intact (while helping the company evolve to meet new competitive and
market dynamics).
This rich cultural identity is part
of the competitive advantage of leading organizations such as the Mayo Clinic,
Apple, Procter & Gamble, and IBM. When it slips, because people grow
complacent or lose touch, the CEO is expected to step in and reignite the
enthusiasm and vigor that were part of the culture originally—as Conant did at
Campbell’s and as Meg Whitman appears to be doing at Hewlett-Packard.
Things
Only the CEO Can Do
Most chief executives are master
delegators. Some believe, as one chief executive we know puts it, that
successful delegation is the single most important skill that a developing
leader needs. “It is the only way a rising leader can handle increasing
responsibilities, and the best way to develop subordinates.”
For the most part, we agree—except
when it comes to the CEO’s cultural impact. The activities described in this
article should not be assigned to others. Leaders who delegate too much will
lose their opportunity to become role models and energizers for the culture
they want to shape. For example, you should be personally involved in selecting
the new behaviors needed by the company. Your choice should reflect the
company’s strategic and operating priorities, in a way that others throughout
the company can comfortably align with. However, getting down to a few critical
priorities will almost always be a judgment call you need to make, because no
choice will be easy to defend.
Only you can interact with others on
your own behalf. Only you can speak regularly for yourself with people
throughout the company, informally and outside normal channels. When incoming
CEO Jack Rowe launched a turnaround journey at Aetna Inc. in 2000, he kept in
direct personal contact with nearly 100 leaders in multiple levels and
functions. These informal networks not only brought him up to speed on the way
people thought about their work and the practices they followed, but became
viral spreaders of the culture he wanted to evolve.
Because you, as CEO, have the final
word on most strategic and operational decisions, the most critical aspects of
cultural impact—selectivity, simplicity, and targeted persistence—are in your
domain. Moreover, your role as cultural leader is, more likely than not, the
single thing you will be most remembered for. That’s why so many CEOs refer to
culture as their highest priority; it is the primary vehicle for establishing their legacy.
Jon Katzenbach & DeAnne
Aguirre Booz & Company
http://www.strategy-business.com/article/00179?pg=all
No comments:
Post a Comment