Your benchmark should be based on your needs
Have an idea about how much money you will require in the
future, invest for it and check midway if you are going to get there.
Imagine a cricketer coming in to bat, and on reaching
28 runs, taking off his helmet and waving to the crowd as if he had hit a
century. Why did he do that? He did it because his batting average till that
point was 27.6 and he had set himself a target of exceeding that average. So
when he scored 28, he felt he had succeeded.
Not about cricket
That was a joke. However, it was not a cricket joke
but an investing one. No batsman in the world would celebrate a paltry score,
but there are plenty of investment managers who would. Some fund managers think
if they have exceeded any given measure of average performance then they have
achieved what they set out to do for their customers.
This thinking has permeated down to the customers as
well. As a saver, what is it that you would have set out to do? To beat an
index or some average? A lot of investors feel that as long as they have done
that, they have achieved something. If they are the debt investors, they feel
exceeding the fixed deposit rate is the benchmark and if they are the equity
investors, then they feel that exceeding the Nifty or the Sensex return is the
measure of being a successful investor.
This line of thinking is reinforced by the media and
analysts. The end of the year is approaching and soon, you will see newspapers,
magazines and websites fill up with articles, tables and graphs about what
fared well during the year. This is of use only to those who always invest on 1
January and redeem their money on 31 December. In other words, it’s useless.
An individual who invests or chooses investments
based on such benchmarks, could end up making some decidedly suboptimal
investments. One could exceed all types of frequently used average benchmarks
and still be a loser. Exactly like the cricketer I referred to earlier.
Which race are you running?
What is the real benchmark that an investor should
follow? What should this be based on? The self-evident answer is something that
aligns with your own needs. ‘Need’ here encompasses the way you would invest as
well as what you eventually expect from the investment. Most of us have a
certain amount of money that needs to be invested every month. From a returns
or safety perspective too, regular monthly investments are the best. I looked
up the investment performance of monthly SIPs in equity funds on Value Research
Online and found that almost every single fund had beat the public benchmark.
Having said that, the only benchmark that makes sense
is one that is unique to you, one that is based on your needs. A general
benchmark makes no sense. How much money will you need in the future? Are your
investments on track to achieve the target? Did you actually achieve the
targets in the past? These questions, or rather, the answers to these
questions, are all that matter. If the answers are mostly in the negative, then
it doesn’t matter if your investment beat the fixed deposit rate or the Sensex.
That’s not the race you were running.
Often, in many other endeavours, as long as one
maintains some motion, some activity, one gets to the target. Savings and
investments are not like that. This is the hard part. Savings and investments
are about having an idea of the amount one will need in the future, then
investing for it, and then knowing, en route, whether one is going to get
there. Unfortunately, there is no easier alternative.
DHIRENDRA KUMAR
CEO, VALUE RESEARCH
CEO, VALUE RESEARCH
ETW 19NOV18
No comments:
Post a Comment