DID NEWTON REALLY HAVE AN APPLE
FALL ON HIS HEAD, INSPIRING HIM TO COME UP WITH HIS THEORY ON GRAVITY?
In grade school you probably learned Newton’s
apple story around the time you learned that George
Washington chopped down a cherry tree, that people
in Columbus’ time thought that the world was flat,
or that the
Pilgrims celebrated the first Thanksgiving in America and invited the Native
Americans to join them. Since literally none of the latter
three stories here are true (follow the preceding links for full
details), you probably have your doubts about whether Newton actually sat under
an apple tree and had something of a “eureka” moment concerning gravity.
It
might surprise you to learn, then, that your teachers got one of these stories
(partially) correct. Newton was indeed sitting under an apple tree when he had
his so-called “eureka” moment on how gravity worked.
Although, it took him over two decades more
to develop the fully-fledged theory of “universal gravitation”, first published
in his PhilosophiƦ Naturalis Principia Mathematica on July 5,
1687. He also didn’t complete it without some ideas others had already
come up with, such as Christopher Wren, Robert Hooke, and Edmond Halley (who
Halley’s comet is named after); though Newton
claims particularly Hooke, who corresponded heavily with Newton on gravity, and
his ideas had little real bearing on his work, other than simply to inspire him
to continue working on the problem.
As
Newton stated when Hooke accused Newton of plagiarizing his work:
Yet am I not beholden to him for any light into that
business but only for the diversion he gave me from my other studies to think
on these things & for his dogmaticalness in writing as if he had found the
motion in the Ellipsis, which inclined me to try it…
So perhaps “eureka” conveys much too strong of a leap.
From accounts, he was more just put on the correct path while musing under the
tree.
Further, it would seem that the apple didn’t fall
directly on his head- at least there is no documented evidence of this. But if
you discount the notion that he near instantly fleshed out his universal theory
and the “fell on his head” bit, the common story is pretty accurate.
One of the best
sources we have for the “apple falling on Newton’s head” anecdote is a
manuscript written by Newton’s friend William Stukeley. He published Memoirs of Sir Isaac Newton’s Life in 1752,
becoming one of Newton’s first biographers. Many of the incidences described in
the book were recorded much earlier than 1752, including the “apple” story
which was first documented in 1726, the year Newton died, and then again a year
later by Voltaire in his Epic Poetry.
Stukeley’s account is as follows:
After dinner, the weather being warm, we went into the
garden, & drank tea under the shade of some appletrees, only he, &
myself. amidst other discourse, he told me, he was just in the same situation,
as when formerly, the notion of gravitation came into his mind. “Why should
that apple always descend perpendicularly to the ground,” thought he to him
self: occasion’d by the fall of an apple, as he sat in a contemplative mood:
“Why should it not go sideways, or upwards? but constantly to the earths
centre? Assuredly, the reason is, that the earth draws it. There must be a
drawing power in matter. & the sum of the drawing power in the matter of
the earth must be in the earths centre, not in any side of the earth. therefore
dos this apple fall perpendicularly, or toward the centre. If matter thus draws
matter; it must be in proportion of its quantity. Therefore the apple draws the
earth, as well as the earth draws the apple.
John Conduitt, Newton’s assistant and the husband of his
niece, told pretty much the same story. Newton lived with the pair in his later
years and doted upon their daughter. When writing about Newton, Conduitt said:
In the year he retired again from Cambridge on account of
the plague to his mother in Lincolnshire & whilst he was musing in a garden
it came into his thought that the same power of gravity (which made an apple
fall from the tree to the ground) was not limited to a certain distance from
the earth but must extend much farther than was usually thought – Why not as
high as the Moon said he to himself & if so that must influence her motion
& perhaps retain her in her orbit, whereupon he fell a calculating what
would be the effect of that supposition but being absent from books &
taking the common estimate in use among Geographers & our sea men before
Norwood had measured the earth, that 60 English miles were contained in one
degree of latitude his computation did not agree with his Theory & inclined
him then to entertain a notion that together with the power of gravity there
might be a mixture of that force which the moon would have if it was carried
along in a vortex, but when the Tract of Picard of the measure of the earth
came out shewing that a degree was about 69.12 English miles He began his
calculation a new & found it perfectly agreeable to his Theory.
The “year [Newton] retired again from Cambridge” was
1666, which means Stukeley’s recording of the event took place some 60 years
after it happened. However, both Stukeley and Conduitt, among others, appear to
have independently heard the story directly from Newton himself, making it
reasonable to believe a falling apple was, indeed, the source of Newton’s first
significant musings over how gravity works.
There are many different places which claim to be the
home of the apple tree that inspired Newton’s theory, but the most likely
one—given the accounts—is located at his family home of Woolsthorpe Manor near
Grantham, UK.
And, yes, there is an apple tree there today that is
thought to be the apple tree in question, though it has re-rooted in the
interim after being knocked over in a storm in 1890. Now around 400 years old,
the tree and the property are protected by the National Trust.
If you’re curious, the tree is a Flower of Kent, which
doesn’t produce very good apples for eating by today’s standards, though they
are considered good cooking apples. Further, the apples in question are
green, not red as is often depicted in Isaac Newton/apple images.
You’ll note, of
course, that Stukeley above stated there was more than one apple tree there at
the time; so whether this remaining one is “the” apple tree is a question can’t
be definitively answered until someone invents a machine that can take us back
in time to observe the event. That being said, Dr Richard Keesing from
the Department of Physics at the University of York makes
a pretty good case for why it probably is the correct tree.
Despite this uncertainty, there are a many trees that
have been started as grafts from the Woolsthorpe tree, including one at Trinity
College in Cambridge which sits beneath the window of the room Newton used when
studying there.
I FOUND OUT
No comments:
Post a Comment