The
Backlash Against Equality
The
fear of losing control prompts today’s epidemic of violence against women
Open the newspapers and the reports
of violence against women are so brutal, and up close, that they curdle your
morning tea. Such crimes are not only on the rise, but traditional leaders have
gone much further than they ever did in the past. Even the Hindu Marriage Act
is now being questioned. Why has our world suddenly become so intolerant? Have
we turned the clock back?
Not exactly! Dreadful as such incidents are, they probably reflect a slow churning at the base of our society. This process is so deep that most people who are in the thick of it do not quite know they are playing a historical role. Women are being attacked not because of a backward movement, but because there is a forward thrust.
Women, today, end up offending patriarchal norms simply because they are exercising choice in a way that was unavailable to them in the past. If grandfathers are killing their granddaughters in the name of culture, it is because they feel the old world slipping away. As long as everybody lived by established mores, nobody got hurt. Do things differently and the heavy hand of tradition lands on you.
To get a measure of this, think back to the American South in the second half of the 19th century. This appears contradictory, but precisely at the point when slaves were legally freed and Lincoln had won the civil war the lynching of blacks began. As long as they did not raise their heads and played the Uncle Tom and Aunt Mamie stereotypes, it was alright: nothing ever happened to them.
Till that time, lynching in America usually involved white people hanging other white people. Those who dangled at the end of a rope were horse thieves, or just plain thieves, or political opponents, and there was hardly a black man among them. Records tell us that between 1830 and 1850, most of those who were lynched were white. All
that changed after the American civil war. The slaves had now been freed and were beginning to demand their rights as equals. It was then that white supremacists struck and lynching of blacks went epidemic: how dare they want to be like us?
Was there no prejudice against blacks earlier? Sure, there was; but why get angry for they behaved themselves and played the buffoon (if period Hollywood films are to be believed)? It was only when they began to demand their rights as citizens, that lynching began. Its frequency was the highest in southern United States where white people had prospered with slave labour.
Ancient prejudices welled up among whites because a new world was threatening their way of life. In 1950, Rosa Parks re-ignited the civil rights movement in America when she stubbornly refused to yield her bus seat to a white passenger. Today, it is hard to imagine the kind of white heat that blacks felt on their backs – the United States has changed that much. With some luck and a lot of fortitude, India will too.
When Babli and Manoj were killed by their family in 2007, or when Monika and Rinku were done in by their kin in 2010 (their bodies strung up, lynch style), it was as if the medieval world had suddenly returned. The truth is that because these poor couples, in their own way, took on tradition, they had to die. If they had stayed on as obedient children of the clan, they would be with us today.
In September, this year, it was big news when Mumbai’s Haji Ali Dargah refused to allow women to say their prayers inside the mosque. But had the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan not challenged the traditional norm that kept women out, this matter would never have been known. Male prejudice always ruled the mosque, but most of us were not aware of it. It was the women activists who nailed it to the counter and brought matters to a head.
Another piece of good news, but now from Rohtak, Haryana. This region is notorious for honour killings and many members of parliament are happy to sell the women’s cause down the river. But the newly emergent Gramin Mahila Vikas Samiti promises to change all that. Fortunately, it has also won the support of many neighbouring panchayats. They are ready to take khap (or clan) tradition to the wire and not yield to it.
When none of this was happening and tradition was left untouched, there was no protest against the Hindu Marriage Act or against the Indian Penal Code. They just did not matter as they were routinely flouted anyway. Now that women are beginning to assert themselves, either quietly by marrying against family wishes, or challenging male authority deliberately, patriarchs have become violent, wild and woolly. In the past, as everybody behaved by established mores, the hold of tradition had never been tested.
If violence against women is on the rise today, it is because they are the vanguards of change. They have forced tradition to rear its ugly head and come out from behind the veil.
The writer is a social scientist.
Not exactly! Dreadful as such incidents are, they probably reflect a slow churning at the base of our society. This process is so deep that most people who are in the thick of it do not quite know they are playing a historical role. Women are being attacked not because of a backward movement, but because there is a forward thrust.
Women, today, end up offending patriarchal norms simply because they are exercising choice in a way that was unavailable to them in the past. If grandfathers are killing their granddaughters in the name of culture, it is because they feel the old world slipping away. As long as everybody lived by established mores, nobody got hurt. Do things differently and the heavy hand of tradition lands on you.
To get a measure of this, think back to the American South in the second half of the 19th century. This appears contradictory, but precisely at the point when slaves were legally freed and Lincoln had won the civil war the lynching of blacks began. As long as they did not raise their heads and played the Uncle Tom and Aunt Mamie stereotypes, it was alright: nothing ever happened to them.
Till that time, lynching in America usually involved white people hanging other white people. Those who dangled at the end of a rope were horse thieves, or just plain thieves, or political opponents, and there was hardly a black man among them. Records tell us that between 1830 and 1850, most of those who were lynched were white. All
that changed after the American civil war. The slaves had now been freed and were beginning to demand their rights as equals. It was then that white supremacists struck and lynching of blacks went epidemic: how dare they want to be like us?
Was there no prejudice against blacks earlier? Sure, there was; but why get angry for they behaved themselves and played the buffoon (if period Hollywood films are to be believed)? It was only when they began to demand their rights as citizens, that lynching began. Its frequency was the highest in southern United States where white people had prospered with slave labour.
Ancient prejudices welled up among whites because a new world was threatening their way of life. In 1950, Rosa Parks re-ignited the civil rights movement in America when she stubbornly refused to yield her bus seat to a white passenger. Today, it is hard to imagine the kind of white heat that blacks felt on their backs – the United States has changed that much. With some luck and a lot of fortitude, India will too.
When Babli and Manoj were killed by their family in 2007, or when Monika and Rinku were done in by their kin in 2010 (their bodies strung up, lynch style), it was as if the medieval world had suddenly returned. The truth is that because these poor couples, in their own way, took on tradition, they had to die. If they had stayed on as obedient children of the clan, they would be with us today.
In September, this year, it was big news when Mumbai’s Haji Ali Dargah refused to allow women to say their prayers inside the mosque. But had the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan not challenged the traditional norm that kept women out, this matter would never have been known. Male prejudice always ruled the mosque, but most of us were not aware of it. It was the women activists who nailed it to the counter and brought matters to a head.
Another piece of good news, but now from Rohtak, Haryana. This region is notorious for honour killings and many members of parliament are happy to sell the women’s cause down the river. But the newly emergent Gramin Mahila Vikas Samiti promises to change all that. Fortunately, it has also won the support of many neighbouring panchayats. They are ready to take khap (or clan) tradition to the wire and not yield to it.
When none of this was happening and tradition was left untouched, there was no protest against the Hindu Marriage Act or against the Indian Penal Code. They just did not matter as they were routinely flouted anyway. Now that women are beginning to assert themselves, either quietly by marrying against family wishes, or challenging male authority deliberately, patriarchs have become violent, wild and woolly. In the past, as everybody behaved by established mores, the hold of tradition had never been tested.
If violence against women is on the rise today, it is because they are the vanguards of change. They have forced tradition to rear its ugly head and come out from behind the veil.
The writer is a social scientist.
Dipankar
Gupta TOI121208
No comments:
Post a Comment