How Oxytocin Can Make Your Job
More Meaningful PART I
Does your job suck? Neuroscience research suggests it might be
missing two key ingredients.
Let’s be honest: For many people, work
sucks.
But for others, work is an adventure. The
difference doesn’t always lie in the nature of the work. Two different people
can have two very different responses to the same job—but my research has also
shown that organizational culture makes a huge difference in how we feel about,
and perform, at work.
I spent eight years measuring brain activity
while people worked in order to identify the components of workplace culture
that make work an adventure. This was preceded by a decade of doing laboratory
studies to understand the brain basis for effective teamwork.
I discovered that teams needed two key
components to perform their best: trust among team members and an understanding
of the purpose of their work. We found that both of these have a shared
neurologic foundation, providing a framework to identify best practices when
creating or modifying work cultures.
Trust and purpose do not magically arise in
companies. Rather, they are strategic assets that can be measured and managed
for high performance. My analysis showed that trust and purpose improve the
triple bottom line: They are good for employees, improve organizational
performance, and strengthen communities.
Oxytocin
at work
Of course, I did not start a long research program without
some hypotheses. My experiments in the early 2000s on human cooperation were
the first to identify the key role played by the neurochemical oxytocin. This
molecule had not been associated with human social behaviors until my group
developed a technique to stimulate and measure the brain’s acute production of
oxytocin through rapid blood draws.
Using this protocol, we showed that when one
is intentionally trusted, even by a stranger, the brain produces oxytocin. This
reduces the typical wariness we have of interacting with those we do not know
and increases our ability to understand others’ emotions. The enhanced empathy
enabled by oxytocin allows humans to quickly form teams and work together effectively.
In fact, this response is graded: The more
trust one is shown by others, the more oxytocin is released in the brain. High
levels of oxytocin cause people to work harder to help the group achieve its
goals. We know it is oxytocin causing cooperation because my colleagues and I
developed a way to safely infuse synthetic oxytocin into living human brains.
When we do this, self-sacrifice to help others, even those different from
us, flourishes.
Trust
makes work easier
These laboratory studies showed that when
trust between team members is high, oxytocin flows and work feels less like,
well, work, and more like doing interesting things with friends. But would
these findings hold outside the lab? I put on my boots and looked for field
sites to test these effects.
A number of businesses, including retailer
Zappos.com and office designer Herman Miller, agreed to let me draw blood and
measure brain activity from their employees as they worked. These tests
confirmed our lab findings: Teams that caused oxytocin release in each other
were more productive and innovative, and enjoyed the tasks they were doing
more, than those whose brains did not connect to their teammates’.
I also went as far from the developed world
as I could to test the role of oxytocin on teamwork to convince myself that the
neural signatures of cooperation were universal. This led me deep into the
rainforest of the Western Highlands of Papua New Guinea where, with the help of
an anthropologist, I joined an isolated tribe of one thousand subsistence
farmers. The Malke people live without electricity or plumbing and have never
been to a doctor. I set up generators and a medical hut to take blood samples
and measure oxytocin before and after a traditional dance that preceded group
work. I proved that the brains of indigenous people produce oxytocin and this
makes heavy work light.
Making
work meaningful
In addition to trust, I had hypothesized that
teams needed a second component to perform at the highest levels: knowing that
their work matters.
Management thinkers from W. Edwards Deming to
my late colleague Peter Drucker asserted that the only reason an organization
exists is because it improves people’s lives. Why else would you pay for a
company’s or nonprofit’s product or service? I call this an organization’s
transcendent purpose—or just “Purpose” for short.
“Teams that had both high trust and high
purpose blew away the competition”
―Dr. Paul Zak
This is a distinct notion from the essential
quotidian doing of business that is a company’s transactional purpose. Studies
from my lab and others have shown that working with Purpose is a potent
oxytocin stimulus. When colleagues understand a company’s Purpose and,
importantly, act on it while at work, a second oxytocin stimulus arises because
most of us value helping others. My experiments showed that teams that had both
high trust and high Purpose blew away the competition.
But would this be true across a large group
of organizations? That is what I had to prove next.
Finding
leverage
Blood draws are just not a scalable way to
measure trust. Initially, when business leaders asked for my help in boosting
trust in their companies, I offered to draw blood from their employees and
watched these executives’ faces turn pale.
My earliest research on
trust explained why it varied across countries and how it improved living
standards (done with World Bank economist Stephen Knack). I decided to follow
this tack with organizations: I ran experiments to figure out what types of
behaviors between colleagues would stimulate oxytocin release. These studies
showed that there are eight building blocks for organizational trust. I created
a handy acronym so they are easily remembered, OXYTOCIN:
·
Ovation: recognize high performers
·
eXpectation: design difficult but achievable
challenges
·
Yield: train extensively and delegate
generously
·
Transfer: facilitate job crafting
·
Openness: share information broadly
·
Caring: intentionally build relationships
·
Invest: promote personal and professional
growth
·
Natural: be authentic and vulnerable.
Each of these factors explains between 45
percent and 72 percent of the variation in organizational trust. This means
that when leaders change any one of the OXYTOCIN factors, it creates
substantial leverage to raise trust and improve performance.
OXYTOCIN
and Purpose exemplars
In order to make this scalable, I created
a survey (that you
can try for yourself) that measures the OXYTOCIN factors so companies can
manage trust and foster Purpose.
Ovation.
The Container Store does
Ovation in brass. And straw. And chocolate. Ovation is embedded in their
culture, from daily huddles before the stores open to end-of-day “gratitudes”
celebrating the hard work of colleagues. An Ovation that I helped The Container
Store strengthen is called “We Love Our Employees Day.” The Container Store
re-purposed Valentine’s Day by sending every employee a gift basket that
includes a “love note” from the founders, T-shirts, chocolates, and other fun
gifts. In 2012, the company put a ten-foot-high “love note” to its employees on
the roof of its headquarters. They have also purchased full-page ads stating,
“We Love Our Employees!” in the New York Timesand the Dallas
Morning News. As love songs play in stores, customers are encouraged to go
to the company’s website and leave “love notes” to show appreciation for their
favorite employees.
eXpectation.
The Royal Bank of Canada put
a focus on eXpectations during their 2005 turnaround. In 2004, Canada’s largest
bank was lagging, both structurally and financially. Decisions took eons to
make and collaboration between business units was rare. CEO Gordon Nixon
engineered a series of culture changes to align RBC’s execution with its goals.
One of the first things he did was to set concrete eXpectations for all
business units. Across RBC’s departments, joint goals were established so that
each unit would work together to meet organization-wide objectives. To put
teeth into eXpectations, each unit wrote a “charter” so that eXpectations and
accountability were transparent. A key charter component was welcoming
challenges rather than avoiding them. These changes worked. By 2007, RBC
colleagues were focused on meeting eXpectations and its financial performance
was best in class.
CONTINUES IN PART II
No comments:
Post a Comment