MEETING SPECIAL BRAINSTORMING
DOESN'T WORK; TRY THIS TECHNIQUE INSTEAD
EVER BEEN IN A MEETING WHERE ONE LOUDMOUTH'S MEDIOCRE IDEA DOMINATES?
THEN YOU KNOW BRAINSTORMING NEEDS AN OVERHAUL.
Brainstorming, in its current form and by many metrics, doesn't work
as well as the frequency of "team brainstorming meetings" would
suggests it does.
EARLY IDEAS TEND TO HAVE DISPROPORTIONATE INFLUENCE
OVER THE REST OF THE CONVERSATION.
Sharing ideas in groups isn't the problem, it's the
"out-loud" part that, ironically, leads to groupthink, instead of
unique ideas. "As sexy as brainstorming is, with people popping like
champagne with ideas, what actually happens is when one person is talking
you're not thinking of your own ideas," Leigh
Thompson, a management professor at the Kellogg School, told Fast
Company. "Sub-consciously you're already assimilating to my
ideas."
That process is called "anchoring," and it
crushes originality. "Early ideas tend to have disproportionate influence
over the rest of the conversation," Loran
Nordgren, also a professor at Kellogg, explained. "They
establish the kinds of norms, or cement the idea of what are appropriate
examples or potential solutions for
the problem."
Because brainstorming favors the first ideas, it also
breeds the least creative ideas, a phenomenon called conformity pressure.
People hoping to look smart and productive will blurt out low-hanging fruit
first. Everyone else then rallies around that idea both internally and
externally. Unfortunately, that takes up time and energy, leaving a lot
the best thinking undeveloped. We've all been in meetings like this: Some jerk
says the obvious thing before anyone else, taking all of the glory; everyone
else harrumphs. Brainstorm session over.
To avoid these problems, both Thompson and Nordgren
suggest another, quieter process: brainwriting. (The phrase, now used by
Thompson, was coined by UT Arlington professor Paul Paulus.) The general
principle is that idea generation should exist separate from discussion.
Although the two professors have slightly different systems, they both offer
the same general solution: write first, talk second.
Brainstorming works best if before or at the beginning
of the meeting, people write down their ideas. Then everyone comes together to
share those ideas out loud in a systematic way. Thompson has her participants
post all the ideas on a wall, without anyone's name attached and then everyone
votes on the best ones. "It should be a meritocracy of ideas," she
said. "It's not a popularity contest." Only after that do people
talk.
Nordgren, via an app he developed called Candor,
has people record their thoughts before the meeting. Then, everyone goes around
in a circle saying each idea.
This write first, discuss later system eliminates the
anchoring problem because people think in a vacuum, unbiased by anyone else. Of
course, people still jot down the most obvious ideas, which aren't necessarily
bad ideas. But in brainstorming the goal is quantity, not quality. To avoid
spending too much time on repetitive suggestions, people using Candor only
present ideas someone else hasn't already said.
IN MOST MEETINGS WITH TRADITIONAL BRAINSTORMING, A FEW
PEOPLE DO 60-75% OF THE TALKING. WITH BRAINWRITING, EVERYONE GETS A CHANCE.
In her studies, Thompson found that brainwriting
groups generated 20% more ideas and 42% more original ideas as compared to
traditional brainstorming groups, she writes in her book Creative Conspiracy.
"I was shocked to find there's not a single published study in which a
face-to-face brainstorming group outperforms a brainwriting group," she
said. In Nordgren's research he has found that the process leads to more
diverse and candid ideas.
Discussion still has its merits, but should only take
place after the group has generated a variety of distinct ideas with which to
work. Raw ideas rarely work. It's the permutation and combination of the outlandish
and banal that lead to the best proposals. "Usually the best idea that is
selected at the end isn't exactly what anyone came up with at the beginning;
the idea has been edited," Nordgren added.
The best part of introverted thinking, however, is
that it cuts down on what I'll call the "loudmouth meeting-hog
phenomenon." You know the type: the person who, along with one or two
other people, dominate the conversation. (Here Fast Company's
Baratunde Thurston acts out this very
scenario with Behance Co-Founder Scott Belsky.) Thompson's studies have found
that in most meetings with traditional brainstorming, a few people do 60-75% of
the talking. With brainwriting, everyone gets a chance.
BY REBECCA GREENFIELD
http://www.fastcompany.com/3033567/agendas/brainstorming-doesnt-work-try-this-technique-instead?partner=newsletter
No comments:
Post a Comment