Logos Mean More than You Think
It
is shocking that companies do not seem to recognise the profound influence
logos can have.
Airbnb,
the home rental service and latest darling of Silicon Valley, launched a new
logo in mid-July to much fanfare. As part of a rebranding campaign, the new
logo was named Bélo and was said to signify people, places and love. But
internet users saw something entirely different.
Gizmodo
wrote that “The New Airbnb Logo Is a Sexual Rorschach Test
For Our Time”! And the BBC
reported that “Airbnb’s new logo faces social media backlash”. And
the problem didn’t stop at internet users photoshopping the logo into all kinds
of strange adaptations. It also emerged that Airbnb’s logo is almost
identical to an existing one used by an IT company
called Automation
Anywhere. The two companies are apparently “working
cooperatively to address the issue.”
This
is not the first time that a company has goofed up when renovating or
changing its logo. Some years ago, GAP attempted to change its logo but
abandoned the effort when it met with a fast and furious backlash on
both Twitter and Facebook.
It
always surprises me that companies get themselves into such hot water over
their logos. Creating a new logo is expensive; BP Amoco, for instance, spent
US$7.8 million on the design of its new brand logo and the Norwegian Post
Office, Posten, more than US$55 million to refurbish its logo. A little
research can yield key insights to avoid putting out the wrong message and
ruining the potential impact of such large investments.
Shapes
shape perceptions
Logos
can also influence consumer judgments of the physical characteristics of the
brand. For instance, our research
shows that angular logos lead consumers to make
inferences about the hardness (inflexibility for services) and durability
of the product or service associated with the logo. Rounded logos, however,
lead consumers to infer that associated products or services are soft (customer
responsive for services) and comfortable. Airbnb has chosen well in this
regard with softer, more circular logo characteristics to give a sense of
comfort to potential guests. Where it went wrong was failing to see the shape
as a whole and what it could be construed as.
This
effect is compounded by the presence of verbal claims in the ad that match its
graphical inferences. In our study, consumers liked a product more and
were willing to pay more for it if the logo shape inferences were consistent with
the verbal advertisement.
While
companies should choose logos that have aesthetic properties that reinforce the
desired image of the brand, they should also be aware of consumer perceptions
of the whole image.
To
all the companies contemplating refurbishing or changing their logo,
please do your homework. Ask consumers what they associate with the new logo
and whether they like it. Consumer competitions are a good idea. The
Octopus Card of the Hong Kong MTR, the territory’s mass transit system, which
had a wildly successful consumer competition to name the transit card in 1996,
is a good example. In such cases, there are three benefits: you can crowd
source the logo options enhancing consumer engagement, warn consumers of an
impending change and create publicity for your brand.
However,
this is only step one as it does not shield you from the problem Airbnb
encountered. For that, you need to do some additional research. You
should shortlist a set of logos from the crowd sourcing effort, based on a set
of criteria for choosing your potential logo, then you would do due diligence
to ensure that the subset of logos you have chosen are not similar to existing
logos. Next, you would go to your target consumers and ask them what they
associate the logo options with, making sure that there are no negative
associations, verbal or visual. The final step is to ask consumers if the logos
had the associations that you desired, along specific benefit dimensions, for
example, comfort, and also how much they liked each logo. Now you can choose.
If you are international like Airbnb or intend to be international, then you
need to sample target consumers from the relevant markets.
Going
with internal opinions is like playing Russian roulette. Another perspective
can’t hurt.
Amitava
Chattopadhyay is The
GlaxoSmithKline Chaired Professor in Corporate Innovation at INSEAD and
co-author of The New
Emerging Market Multinationals: Four Strategies for Disrupting Markets and
Building Brands. You can
follow him on Twitter @AmitavaChats
Read more at
http://knowledge.insead.edu/blog/insead-blog/logos-mean-more-than-you-think-3490?utm_source=INSEAD+Knowledge&utm_campaign=f0ec46a1a3-7_August_mailer8_7_2014&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_e079141ebb-f0ec46a1a3-249840429&nopaging=1#uiEBLtRqFYYEVST1.99
No comments:
Post a Comment