Why Walmart Is Like a Forest
The story of Wal-Mart Stores Inc.’s
growth from a chain of small, rural discount stores to its current position as
the world’s largest retailer and private employer is the stuff of business
legend. Analysts cite numerous reasons for the company’s growth, ranging from
its logistical prowess and the entrepreneurial genius of founder Sam Walton to
predatory pricing and the abuse of labor laws. But a cause of Walmart’s success
that one rarely sees advanced is that of the firm’s roots in rural Arkansas,
and the disciplines imposed on the fledgling business by that challenging
context.
The development of a forest, or forest
succession, in a temperate climate begins in an open patch of land that
provides equal access to sun and rain. Its initial colonizers are migrants,
weeds, and wandering animals that spread seeds.
You can see the same dynamics at
work in Walmart’s early years. The entrepreneurial merchant Sam Walton
perfected a way to make profits from small outlets in sparsely populated rural
areas, which he often identified from the air. His first store was only 16,000
square feet; subsequent stores were even smaller, at 12,000 square feet.
Because of the absence of
competition in small towns, Walmart grew like a weed. Walton, the wanderer, had
a network of 24 stores in Arkansas before he moved into neighboring states,
still pursuing a rural strategy and avoiding competition in denser population
centers. This was in the 1960s, when the development of the suburban mall was
well under way and many retailers, like Kmart and Sears, Roebuck and Company,
were pursuing economies of scale.
In the forest, the weeds and
wanderers thrive in the open patches until they start to bump into one another.
This creates competition for resources, and favors shrubs and plants that
develop efficient infrastructures. Their roots get to the water first, and the
light gets to their branches and leaves first, helping them grow faster (which
then stunts the growth of their competitors). In turn, the shrubs are succeeded
by softwood trees, which are complex, hierarchical organisms that use resources
even more efficiently.
It’s not hard to see the same
progression at Walmart. Because traditional wholesalers refused to make small
drop-offs on remote country routes, Walton was forced to develop his own
distribution infrastructure. This was the genesis of the company’s famed
logistics system, which was steadily refined as the constraints to efficient
shipping were overcome by novel solutions such as cross-docking, in which goods
delivered from suppliers are shipped directly to branches without intermediate
warehousing. Walton’s continual innovations in infrastructure soon helped him
bypass his competitors, and then prevented them from catching up.
As Walmart grew and encountered more
competition, the size of its stores grew, too. By 2010, they had reached an
average size of more than 160,000 square feet, a ninefold growth over 48 years
— the hardwood trees in the Walmart ecology. With the twin advantages of innovation
and scale, Walmart entered its climax phase.
Thus far, Walmart has largely
avoided the vulnerability inherent in this phase by adapting and diversifying.
Today Walmart’s stores fall into three broad segments.
The first is the original discount
stores, of which there are 803, averaging 108,000 square feet. Their numbers
are declining as they are replaced by the second type of store, the
supercenters, of which there are now 2,747, averaging 186,000 square feet. The
third group is a recently added category of neighborhood stores, of which there
are 158, averaging 42,000 square feet in area. Walmart locates these latter
outlets in areas that cannot justify larger stores. Its profits from these
small “shrubs” are probably modest, but their very presence takes away
resources from would-be rivals, such as dollar stores, that are trying to start
up in the same small-scale way that Walmart did, and that might otherwise
disrupt the ecosystem in the same way that Walmart decimated Kmart and Sears.
The
Cycle Begins Anew
Applying an ecological perspective
to business yields some interesting insights about how to achieve sustainable
success.
• Don’t think of organizations just
as structures; also think of them as movements. Organizations are
conceived in passion and born in communities of trust. They grow through the
application of reason and mature in power. Today Walmart looks like a huge
monolithic structure, but it began life as a movement, fueled by the
convictions of Sam Walton and his vision of service to a community.
• Realize that change is inevitable:
The only real choice is whether you will seek to anticipate it or have it
thrust upon you and be forced to respond without the benefit of forethought.
Ecosystems need regular disruption to create the open patches necessary for
renewal. The use of prescribed burns to renew forests and the release of spring
“pulses” of water from dams to renew rivers are excellent examples of proactive
interventions in the management of natural systems.
• Pursue change on the edges of
systems and in open patches, where variety can flourish on a small scale and
without competition. Know that, conversely, change in the core is difficult
because there is fierce competition for resources.
• Remember that the fruits of
success always contain the seeds of destruction: Success tends to perpetuate
itself, leading to the growth of large, slow-moving systems and homogeneity,
which then leads to a lack of resilience and vulnerability to catastrophic
change.
• Creation requires destruction:
Look for openings on disturbed ground — turbulent markets where information is
scarce and navigation is unclear. What economists call market failures,
entrepreneurs call opportunities.
But forests need fire. Fire tests
the system and breaks down the tall hierarchies (old trees) that monopolize the
resources, recycling them into nutrients. Indeed, fire marks the completion of
one cycle for the forest. It creates the open patches that attract the
entrepreneurs. It makes way for variety to reenter the system, both in the form
of the seeds and weeds and in the creation of multi-aged stands of the dominant
species. Such an ecosystem is once again loosely connected because resources
can flow through it in many ways. It is no longer vulnerable to being wiped out
by a single event, and the perpetual cycle of forest succession begins again.
The Western world, led by the United
States, is going through a testing time. We often hear talk of “creative
destruction,” but without an appreciation of how the process actually works.
Our response to today’s challenges will determine whether we can renew
ourselves and create a sustainable future or whether we will go into a long
decline. We could do much worse than to take our cues to action from nature
itself.
- David Hurst is an adjunct professor at the University of Regina’s Graduate School of Business and a contributing editor of strategy+business.
- This article is adapted from Hurst’s latest book, The New Ecology of Leadership: Business Mastery in a Chaotic World (Columbia University Press, 2012).
Excerpted. To read the full article go to http://www.strategy-business.com/article/00120?pg=all
No comments:
Post a Comment