The challenge is to learn continuously
To
be better leaders we must learn lessons from our everyday life and
must always plan for lean periods to sail through when the wider
market and economy is in a crisis, Ramesh Chandak, MD and CEO of RPG
Group-owned engineering and infrastructure company KEC
International, tells HT in an interview. Edited excerpts:
What
are the key traits of a good leader?
A
leader is one who is able to articulate a vision, believing in that
vision and communicating that to the people across the company, so
that the rest of the people believe in it. Secondly, his ability to
take the right decision at the right time, when the opportunities
come, is key, which depends on the knowledge you have gained.
Thirdly, a person has only 24 hours in a day, so his ability to
delegate and trust the person by empowering him is also important.
Prioritisation
is a general problem and for a CEO that prioritisation is very
important. Sometimes, despite doing all the right things, the work
doesn’t happen. A leader must have the ability to manage
frustration, otherwise the whole organisation will get frustrated
with you.
It
also is very difficult to listen as we all are trained to talk. That
is also key.
Can
leadership be learnt?
Yes.
Everything can be learnt. There may be a rare case of 0.001% where a
person is a genius from the time of birth. The challenge that we
have is many of us are not continuous learners. Taking lessons from
the everyday activities and spending time to evaluate what you have
learnt is important.
Let’s
compare two people — a person who has passes an examination with
merit and another who has just passed. The meritorious student may
or may not perform better than the other. So it all depends on who
is continuously educating himself. The day you stop your curiosity
and education, from that day at least your mental growth stops. Even
if you learn from a bad leader, you will learn what things to avoid.
Leadership will also come out of that.
How
do you groom future leaders?
We
groom future leaders by mentoring the people. Whoever has joined the
company today, doesn’t have the same knowledge. Giving
responsibilities to the person, and continuous monitoring …if you
do these things, then leadership can be groomed in an individual.
There are so many examples of people becoming leaders, where earlier
we thought they can’t reach that position.
We
have very good processes at not just KEC but within the RPG group
itself. Once every year, the senior people including the chairman
sit down and identify the people who can replace the top brass, and
then we send them to good courses at top universities such as
Stanford, London Business School, Harward etc irrespective of the
cost.
How
independent is leadership in a promoter-driven company like yours?
RPG
is professional and not really promoter-driven as such. They see
things from a shareholder point of view, what guidance is required,
what is the vision; but as far as day-to-day management is
concerned, there is no discussion or interference from the chairman.
So, it’s like a private equity that they hold in so many
companies.
In
the last few years, we have seen a series of financial crises. How
challenging has it been in driving the company during this period?
Generally
when we plan for the future, we don’t plan for the lean periods.
Any leader who has the ability to plan for the lean period, his/her
company wouldn’t see financial trouble. If you try to find
infrastructure companies that are not in trouble today, there are
only 4-5. You need to have a strong financial discipline.
That’s
another quality of a leader. Dream is one part, vision is one part
of growth. You have to have your head on the shoulder so that you
don’t go beyond your means. Most companies in India that have
failed because of cash flow problems and not profit and loss
accounts. They were not able to pay off their liabilities in time.
Should
leaders always be held responsible for mistakes of others in the
team?
The
buck has to stop somewhere. Everything goes up and down in the
company. A MD is responsible for that. If any MD is saying that this
mistake is done by my assistant, then, naturally that is not the
right approach. You can’t say the mistake is committed by someone
else. If you have done the monitoring and mentoring, then the
responsibility should also come to you. So its not a blame game, but
it’s the responsibility of the MD, since the board has put the
company in your command. For instance, if there is a war and a major
on the frontline doesn’t perform, the blame has to go to the
general.
What’s
your one line leadership mantra?
Use
common sense.
HT
141030
No comments:
Post a Comment