GENERATION FLUX'S SECRET WEAPON (2)
In a world of rapid change and great uncertainty, the greatest competitive advantage of all may be at your very core.
EMBRACE THE CREATIVE EDGE
Backstage
in Romania, Jared Leto has
a few spare minutes--not to talk about acting, which earned him an
Oscar for his role in Dallas
Buyers Club,
or singing, which has brought him an international fan base as lead
singer of his band, Thirty Seconds to Mars, despite the early
bashings of critics. Leto wants to talk about Leto Inc. The
enterprise starts with the band, a demanding venture: It performed in
Hungary two days earlier, with several other European countries
ahead, then on to the U.S., Canada, most of South America, and South
Africa before the tour ends. "It could last a year," Leto
says, and that wouldn't be its longest road trip ever. The group is
recognized in the Guinness World Records for a marathon 309-show tour
that started in 2009 and ended in 2011.
This
isn't enough to satiate Leto. What he really wants to do is
reengineer the business of being a performer. He uses social
media
to
connect with some 2 million Twitter followers who buy Thirty Seconds
to Mars products and attend special-access events. He has directed an
award-winning documentary about his battles with a former music
label. More impressively, he's got a team of coders working for him
in Silicon Valley on Vyrt, a real-time streaming video platform that
combines merchandise sales, fan management and social engagement, and
he's an active investor in startups includingNest,
Blue Bottle Coffee, and mobile-payments platform Stripe.
So
is he a musician, an actor, a director, or an entrepreneur? "I'm
a multi-hyphenate whatever," Leto says. "I'm a creative and
an artist. I make and share things with the world that hopefully add
to the quality of people's lives." His entrepreneurship "comes
from the same place. I don't compartmentalize," he says. "My
work is never a job. My work is my life. If you work your fucking ass
off, you can get a lot done."
Not
many of us will ever find ourselves shirtless before thousands of
Romanians screaming our name, as Leto does later that evening. But
his attitude is one that we can embrace. Leto channels his creative
passion into business, and more and more evidence suggests that this
is the key to creating a meaningful career.
In
this age of flux, people's sense of connection with their workplace
has been declining. Last year, Gallup
came out with a detailed study of workers across U.S. businesses.
In all industries and all age groups, engagement was pitifully low.
"The vast majority of U.S. workers (70%) are not reaching their
full potential," the report concluded. Yet in those pockets
where passion for the job flourished, productivity, levels of
customer service, and profitability were all higher than average.
"Companies with engaged workforces have higher earnings per
share," the report stated. Perhaps most important (and
surprising) of all: "Engagement has a greater impact on
performance than corporate policies and perks."
"There
has always been a psychological contract between workers and
corporations, often unconscious," says motivation expert Marcelo
Cardoso of Brazilian health care company Grupo Fleury, who has
studied employee engagement across cultures. He notes that the demise
of loyalty-based contracts (job security in exchange for commitment
to the organization) has resulted in a more transactional
relationship between worker and company: bonuses, stock options, and
other compensation bind the two together. "But as the level of
complexity [in business] is increasing, these types of contracts are
no longer satisfying and effective for individuals," Cardoso
says.
A
more effective contract, he says, meshes an individual's sense of
purpose with that of the company. The Gallup report notes that
millennials, gen-Xers, and baby boomers consider "mission and
purpose" a valuable motivator. Other studies reinforce this idea
that unlocking "psychic energy," as Cardoso describes it,
is less tightly tied to financial compensation, as economists had
assumed. As Daniel Pink eloquently explained in the book Drive,
higher pay leads to better performance only for routine, repeatable
tasks; for higher cognitive efforts and creative tasks, maximizing
rewards actually hurts performance.
Jennifer
Aaker
at
Stanford
University
has
taken this idea even further. She challenges the very notion that a
pursuit of happiness is what drives us most. Her work suggests that
people's satisfaction with life is higher, and of greater duration,
when meaning--rather than happiness--is their primary motivation. For
other professors, such as Wharton's Adam
Grant,
this is the difference between a life focused on "giving"
rather than "taking," a difference that they believe
increases productivity as well as satisfaction.
We
should, of course, stop for a moment to acknowledge that choosing a
career built around meaning is not a choice available to billions of
people who are desperately struggling just to make enough money to
find shelter and put food on the table. That is often the only
"mission" that matters. But for those who have been
fortunate enough to look beyond their basic needs, the motivation to
do more, create more, and, yes, give more to the world--whether that
is burritos or iPhones--arises directly from the personal meaning we
derive from those activities. That is the way humans operate. We are
not drones whose only goal is to make more money. Keeping passion out
of the workplace makes no sense at all.
BY
ROBERT
SAFIAN
No comments:
Post a Comment