Tuesday, August 2, 2016

INTERNET SPECIAL ................Keeping the Internet Trustworthy Digital Leadership

Keeping the Internet Trustworthy
Digital Leadership

Neustar CEO Lisa Hook oversees part of the invisible infrastructure that safeguards identity and reliability online.
When the Internet was first established in the late 1960s, as a group of interconnected university computers exchanging software files, there wasn’t much need for authentication. In the small, U.S. Department of Defense–funded community of programmers and technical administrators, everyone knew everyone else. But as the network expanded exponentially, especially after the browser was introduced in the early 1990s, authentication became critical. Today, whenever a message is sent, a transaction is posted, or a website is registered, the identities of the users involved must be established. On a purely technical level, there must be a reasonable level of trust that a message aimed at a particular computer or device will reach its chosen destination. Like everything else about the Internet, the infrastructure for ensuring that this happens evolved in a decentralized fashion, and it is now reaching new levels of sophistication and complexity as billions of devices with IP addresses come on line around the world.
Lisa Hook is right in the middle of this seemingly self-organizing system — and is one of the key people moving it forward, one step ahead of global demand. She is the president and CEO of Neustar, a company based in Sterling, Va., that provides analytics and certification for messages on the Internet, drawing on its capability for building and managing massive communications-oriented data sets. Founded in 1998, Neustar acts as an invisible hand guiding calls, texts, and Internet queries for approximately 30 percent of the Web traffic around the world, including all text messages within the United States, and the U.S. registries that track who holds which phone numbers. The company’s primary customers are the large enterprises and agencies that maintain the sites where traffic congregates. But that’s only a part of the company’s business — a declining segment, as Neustar pivots to take advantage of the enormous need for data services in digital business.
This pivot began around 2012, two years after Hook took the helm of the company as CEO. (She had been president since 2008; before that, she was CEO of VoIP provider SunRocket, an executive at AOL, and a partner at the private equity firm Brera Capital Partners.) She saw that the portfolio of services that Neustar offered would have to develop to meet customers’ increasing demands for authentication, analytics related to online activity, and protection from risk and fraud. It would also have to play a bigger role in making connections among the billions of devices coming online through the Internet of Things and Industry 4.0.
Neustar is a B2B company whose products and services are largely invisible to the general public. (Hook jokes about Neustar being a billion-dollar public company that no one’s heard of.) It is easy for such companies to retreat into a technology-oriented culture, paying little attention to the “soft” side of management. Hook is explicitly following a model more oriented toward human capital. She wants to foster, throughout the company, the kind of decision making and judgment that should go along with the company’s role as a guardian of trust and identity. This perspective, as well as her role as one of the few female CEOs in the technology sector, has helped make her one of the most thoughtful and respected voices in this field.
In a conversation in late 2015, at the company’s modern San Francisco offices — of which Hook spearheaded the design and which she sees as an integral part of the culture she is building — Hook shared her views on the future of her company and of the Internet. The discussion was part of PwC’s 2016 US CEO Survey interview program.

S+B: How do you describe your company’s purpose?
HOOK:
 Our purpose is to connect everyone authoritatively, seamlessly, and accurately. Just connecting to [an address] inside a network is not sufficient; the connection must be to the right person. When you make a phone call to your mother’s phone number, you always get your mother. The call is never routed somewhere else. That flawless routing and addressing — absolute authentication that the person or device on the other end of the communication is what it claims to be — is where Neustar came from in the past and where we intend to be in the future.

S+B: Many people are worried about the economy in the near future. How does that affect the prospects for your company?
HOOK:
 In the U.S., the economy has experienced a couple of bumps, but we see it as relatively stable. We haven’t seen any indications of a slowdown. Our clients are still out there building their businesses, looking for new sources of revenue, and trying to cut costs. The global market is suffering more bumps as a result of China’s problems and changes in the Middle East. There always will be unrest, instability, and global shifts in power — but over the longer term we’re very optimistic about the global economy and are actually looking to expand.
In general, whether the global economy is up or down doesn’t really affect our business. One major part of our business is data analytics for chief marketing officers and chief information officers. They need to know whom they’re talking to on the other end of a phone or online transaction. Identity inside the network is becoming critical as more people around the world are connected, both for good and for evil. The good guys leverage the global connected world, and so do the bad guys. So it’s critical from a security point of view to know with whom you’re communicating. That knowledge — about the individual on the other end — is what we provide.
Every text message and Internet-related telephone call completed every day in the U.S. has to run through our databases to know where to go. That business was not harmed by the economic downturn in 2008 and 2009. If anything, people were making more phone calls and sending more text messages during that period.
We also provide cyber security solutions to address an increasing element in every CEO’s worry bag. That part of our business also continues to grow, regardless of the business climate.
S+B: What markets and areas are you most interested in over the next three years?
HOOK:
 Our company has changed quite dramatically since the recession. At that time, about 80 percent of our revenues came from the U.S. numbering service. Today that service accounts for only 48 percent of our revenues. In the past four years, we’ve grown dramatically in the data analytics space. The transformation has been so radical that 74 percent of my employees have joined the company just in the past two years.
But even through this transformation, we have kept the core DNA of our company: our use of authoritative identity for reliable addressing inside networks. This is exciting in our increasingly connected world through the Internet of Things. We’re moving so rapidly from a world where we only had cell phones to one where our refrigerators may talk to our ovens, where sheep connected to the Internet in China may “communicate” with weavers in Ireland. In an interconnected world, trillions of addresses on the network will need to be identified: What is this thing, who is this person, where are they located, what can they do, and how are they allowed to communicate?
One example of the Internet of Things already in play is in a typical hospital. There are 200 sensors in a single operating room, all communicating with one another, with the surgical team, and with the medical device company. Every single industry is going to be affected by this sort of interconnectivity — agriculture, supply chain management, automotive. We’re just at the very beginning of understanding that, and our company hopes to play its part as the addressing entity for the global connected community. It’s all incredibly exciting.
Right now, the Internet of Things is close to where cellular was in the early days. Each company permitted its customers to send text messages only to other customers on the same network. There was no concept of interoperability between networks. When all the companies got together and decided on a methodology for interoperability, text messaging just exploded. You could send texts to your friends without regard to the network. 
That’s what we need in the Internet of Things. Today, a company’s devices are able to communicate with one another, but they may not be able to connect to other companies’ devices. There needs to be a standard for communications. There also has to be a registry (or registries) containing the addresses and the business rules for those communications. We’re still at the jumping‑off point, getting the basic building blocks in place. For example, a skin sensor is already being developed — which will be promoted by insurance companies — that will allow folks with diabetes to have their blood sugar levels automatically transmitted to their doctor without the pinprick. That’s game changing, and just one of the first applications for the Internet of Things. We know that if we get these building blocks in place, there will be so much creativity on top of the basic registries that the sky’s the limit.
S+B: What do you want Neustar to look like in five years?
HOOK:
 It’s hard to say in a technology environment. The focus is not so much on the end state of the organization, but rather on the “becoming” state of how we want our people to act and think. We spend an inordinate amount of time coaching people through change. But regardless of whether the change is positive or negative, it provokes anxiety. We must create a supportive environment that encourages employees to embrace change, to lead change. The goal is to create an ever-evolving organization that brings everyone along.
Our efforts to accomplish this run the gamut. Because we have a number of data scientists and engineers, as well as sales and product marketing people, we have a wide variety of talents from a wide variety of backgrounds. We take into account that we have extreme introverts and extreme extroverts, so there’s no one-size-fits-all program. We do everything from formal communications to town halls to informal lunches to field trips outside the office. We have silly things like a contest called “Pimp My Cube,” where people can redecorate however they want. We randomly close the office every once in a while, which shocks people. We bring snow machines into our Los Angeles offices when there are horrible storms on the East Coast, just so they have a little bit of a sense of what the weather is like.
We have hackathons. We have serious technical talks for folks who like to meet other people, but only if they have something substantive to talk about. We have wine and beer tastings and dance parties and movie afternoons. We ask folks to get out of their bubble once or twice a month, to meet people they wouldn’t otherwise work with. It seems to be working extremely well.
The number one thing we’re focused on is becoming closer to both our current and our prospective customers, spending time with them in the field, understanding what their pain points are. The most exciting thing is having a customer say, “I was promoted because of you. You saved my job. You made me look great to the CEO.” That’s really where we need to spend more time over the next couple of years.
S+B: How are you implementing your expansion strategies?
HOOK:
 We’ve done nine acquisitions in the past four and a half years, acquiring basic building blocks at a breakneck speed. We recently acquired a company in Australia that’s a great beachhead for Southeast Asia, so we’re looking at expanding there fairly rapidly. We hope to do the same in the E.U.
We are also focusing on organic investment, integrating the acquisitions we have, and getting closer to our customer base. As we expand globally, we’ll look at partnerships for distribution purposes and to fill out our product portfolio. Domestically, we will never provide the entire marketing stack to large companies, so we have a number of data relationships, as well as relationships that involve activating our analytics in the marketing environment.
We’ve been winning business. Our marketing and securities services businesses last quarter grew 17 and 18 percent, so our growth rates are great. If our brand becomes more accessible and better known, we think we can accelerate our growth. So brand awareness and brand affinity is a huge area of interest for us going forward.
S+B: How do you recruit and develop the talent you need for this?
HOOK:
 Like everyone else in technology and analytics, we are always looking for more talented, innovative, and smart people. There is a talent shortage, so we’re focusing our corporate social responsibility efforts in STEM [science, technology, engineering, and math] educational programs, supporting students in the seventh and eighth grade. We are urging them to go into STEM careers.
In fact, our primary underwriting goes to “My Digital Life,” a STEM-readiness curriculum for middle school students that is administered through a D.C.-based nonprofit, EverFi. It’s a phenomenal education program that 250,000 students have graduated from in the last three years in California, Virginia, and Kentucky.
As a self-paced online course, “My Digital Life” teaches kids science and technology, such as how to build a website and how to build a business online, about microprocessors and cellular plants. The students I’ve met who have gone through the program have really loved what they’ve learned. They’ve been more excited about the connected world and all the opportunities it affords them. If we could grab only 10 percent of those children and say, “Go into a STEM career,” that would be a huge step forward for us. Given that every single industry is going to be touched by the Internet of Things and by coding, it’s absolutely vital for our young students to feel comfortable with science, with technology, and with math, and maybe learn basic programming. Even if they don’t have an affinity for STEM, having a comfort around that type of language is critical going forward.
Additionally, we support Grace Hopper — an organization that encourages women in computing, named after the U.S. Navy admiral who was one of the first programmers in the history of computers. We also support Year Up, a program that empowers low-income young adults to go from poverty to professional careers, with our focus on getting students into STEM programs. Wherever we can see a way to support young Americans going into STEM fields, we think it’s absolutely vital, not just for my company, but also for everyone else in technology, for the U.S. government, and ultimately in the interest of national security.
S+B: What are the other things you’re doing to build a distinctive culture?
HOOK:
 We have a very big environmental initiative. Employees are proud that their company invests in STEM and in protecting the environment. Our customers think that differentiates us as well. For instance, a potential client came to our company to look at our security operating center. Our visitors noticed that our facility was certified Platinum LEED [by the U.S. Green Building Council for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design], and that’s why they decided to become a client. You can’t underestimate the need for a company to give back, not only for charitable reasons, not only to make ourselves feel good, but also to function effectively in today’s business environment.
Part of our effort involves getting LEED certification on all of our facilities. As we renew or move into new buildings, we focus on water use, on paper use, on energy usage. We’re running an experiment here in the San Francisco office, as well as in our D.C. office, to go trash-free by 2020. By that I mean no landfill. Of course, we’ll have food waste, which is compostable, but if you walk around the offices here you’ll notice that we have no cans, no bottles, no plastic, no paper plates, and no plastic utensils, and there’s rarely paper at the printing machine. We hope to be that company that one day in 2020 can say that we have 300 people in this building, but we took out only one bag of trash this month. It’s an ambitious goal, but we’re having a lot of fun with it. It is a huge shift for people to realize there’s no bottled water here.
We’re also conscious of diversity, and particularly in Northern California, there’s a huge emphasis on gender diversity. But we view diversity as something much broader than just gender. We also see it as socioeconomic diversity, religious diversity, racial diversity. How does one create that corporate dinner party that brings every possible background into the conversation? There are so many longitudinal studies showing that heterogeneous groups make dramatically better decisions than homogeneous groups. We talk about it, but I’m not sure any of us, including Neustar, are great at linking heterogeneity needs to shareholder value and showing the quantitative causality that’s so critical.
Young women walk up to me and say, “My name is Susan Smith. I joined the company because you’re a female, and I want to be in an environment where women have a voice and are heard.” This doesn’t often happen in a technology environment. I think women [in other workplaces] feel that even when they speak, they’re not heard. For me, it’s really exciting, it’s hugely flattering, and it’s a massive responsibility to live up to their expectations. And I’m going to.
S+B: If you had an unlimited budget and could invest in a new innovative group in your company, what would you want to do?
HOOK:
 If I had an unlimited budget, I would not give it to an innovative group. A great many innovations come from need. In my experience, an unlimited budget actually kills innovation, because in those cases people don’t need to be creative. We let people innovate all the time here. We don’t have a specific 80/20 rule [like the one Google used to have], but if an employee has a great idea, we’ll listen to it, and we’ll give him or her some time to go off and experiment. We may help with some coding, but the last thing we do is give a lot of money.

by Chrisie Wendin

http://www.strategy-business.com/article/Keeping-the-Internet-Trustworthy?gko=12f23&utm_source=itw&utm_medium=20160728&utm_campaign=resp

PERSONAL SPECIAL ...........Why Multilinguals Are More Creative And Have Sharper Minds

PERSONAL SPECIAL Why Multilinguals Are More Creative And Have Sharper Minds

Good news multilinguals, if you haven’t had the chance to step into the creative world or try your hand in business, maybe it’s time that you consider doing so just because you have the sheer advantage to excel in it. Being conversant in multiple languages not only makes you sound cool likeJason Bourne, it also makes you more creative and have a sharper mind. Here’s why:

1.Enhanced Memory

There are definitely times when we suffer mental blocks and can’t remember an English word we want to use and for most of us, it’s probably the only main language we speak. But for a multilingual, that struggle is multiplied especially when they need to use the right word, grammar rules and structure when shifting in culture and context. So it is no surprise that multilinguals are blessed with better working memory than monolinguals.

2.Better Creative Process

According to a team of experts in Europe, they had concluded that being multilingual helps your brain develop more neuronal connections. By learning a new language, your brain is being worked like a muscle, stimulating and developing more neuronal webs which can lead to a higher capacity for generating more creative processes.
Medical Daily reported on a research done to observe 120 9-year-old students. Half were monolinguals and the other were bilinguals. The children were then tested on problem solving and creative thinking. The results? The children who could speak more than one language scored better at the tests. In terms of creative thinking, the bilingual children demonstrated a difference in the level of detail and richness in description.

3.Better Problem-Solving Skills

Research conducted at the American University of Sharjah had shown that multilinguals approach the same problems with different perspectives compared to monolinguals. This is due to the practice of being exposed to different cultures when learning a new language, therefore they are more open-minded when faced with a situation.
Studies have shown that multilinguals are better at filtering out unwanted information because they use more of the executive function of the brain. By doing so, they are efficient in focusing on the problem and yet bring about new perspectives to tackle the problem at different angles.

4.Masters at Multi-tasking

To be able to handle twice or thrice as many words efficiently, the brain has no other choice but to use more focus and resources to be able to switch between languages quickly. Research has shown that because of this, multilinguals are able to switch between multiple tasks and shift their attention quicker than monolinguals.
Not only that, but because the brain of a multilingual has to look out for mistakes and errors during the task of switching languages, this would also be applied efficiently to reduce errors when switching between tasks.

5.Sharp Decision Making Skills

A study in Chicago University had revealed that multilinguals are more likely to make the right decisions as compared to monolinguals. Being able to speak multiple languages allow multilinguals to see the bigger picture and to understand more complex situations better.
The study also showed that when we speak a different language with a less familiar language, we tend to be less biased when making a decision. What this means is that we become more rational when we speak in a second or third language which in turn, helps us to make a better decision.

Multilingualism makes you smarter

Concrete evidence have shown us that being a multilingual can bring about many benefits and as proven in the workforce, it can also be an advantage when searching for a job. Job applications require us to fill in the types of languages we speak as being multilingual is seen to be an asset by employers.
Being a multilingual truly has its perks, so why not get started on a new language right away?
LIM KAIREN

http://www.lifehack.org/419252/why-multilinguals-are-more-creative-and-have-sharper-minds?ref=mail&mtype=daily_newsletter&mid=20160727_customized&uid=687414&email=drmsriram%40yahoo.com&action=click

INNOVATION SPECIAL .........................Forecasting the Success of Innovations

INNOVATION SPECIAL
Forecasting the Success of Innovations

Creators beat managers at predicting an innovation’s success, unless they’re predicting the success of their own work.
You probably know someone who owns an Apple Watch, or maybe you own one yourself. Is it a creative idea? Well, the multi-function watch was creative the first time it appeared in science fiction, but that was a long time ago. Technologically a watch with the Apple Watch functionality has been possible for a while, but firms have waited because they were unsure if it could become a success. If fewer and fewer people wear watches, because smartphones do the same job and much more, why make a watch?
In fact, the potential for success of the Apple Watch was in dispute as soon as it was launched, and it is still not settled. This is an issue that surfaces again and again – firms need to estimate the potential success of ideas, both creative ones and more conventional ones. Innovative solutions are increasingly granting a competitive edge, but managers cannot decide to invest in every novel idea an organisation generates. At the same time, organisations can’t afford to miss out on potentially transformational ideas. There are many examples of managers rejecting novel ideas that go on to be huge successes.
How can organisations make better decisions about which ideas to pursue? In a forthcoming paper in Administrative Science Quarterly, Justin Berg, of the Stanford Graduate School of Business, examines this question in the context of who in the organisation might be best placed to decide what is most likely to be a creative success: creators, managers or customers?
The question is important because it reflects an ongoing tension in firms. Creators think that managers don’t have the right kind of thinking to appreciate their work and managers think that creators are poor decision makers, especially when evaluating their own work. Theoretically the key difference is between the divergent thinking that underlies creativity (generating ideas by exploring many possible solutions), and the convergent thinking that underlies analysis and decision making (giving “correct” answers to standard questions). 
Creative circus
In his paper, Berg turned to the circus industry and drew upon 339 circus professionals, spanning creators, managers and people who occupied roles with both duties across 43 countries as well as 150 non-circus people. Participants were then asked to watch online videos of circus acts and forecast how successful the videos would be with the audience. Creators and those with dual roles also submitted videos and were able to forecast the success of their own work as well as that of others. Berg also surveyed the audience, asking them to rate the videos.
It turns out that the creators are much better at assessing creative success than managers are. Managers could be the worst – even laypeople outperform their predictions in one measure of assessment accuracy.
But managers still had an edge in some respects: creators are bad at assessing the success of their own work (you get no points for guessing that they overestimate it). Even more interesting, a creator with a strong track record of past successes is especially bad at assessing the acts, probably due to overconfidence.
For organisations to better forecast the success of creative ideas, this study gives a good rule of thumb for managers. If a creator says, “I know this product idea will succeed/fail because [insert own success story here]”, it would be worth considering whether they are talking about their own creation or others and what their past record has shown. It would also be useful for managers to ignore themselves occasionally too. Having creators assess each other’s work could be the best way of forecasting whether an idea will be a hit or not. If that’s not possible, ask the audience.

Henrich Greve

Read more at http://knowledge.insead.edu/blog/insead-blog/forecasting-the-success-of-innovations-4826?utm_source=INSEAD+Knowledge&utm_campaign=731e07d4f7-28_July_mailer7_28_2016&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_e079141ebb-731e07d4f7-249840429#HdwS3GFeq51GUq7o.99

Monday, August 1, 2016

BOOK SUMMARY 216The Mindset of Success


BOOK SUMMARY 216 The Mindset of Success

·         Summary written by: Justin Gasbarre
"There is a key to success, and that key is in your head."
- The Mindset of Success, page 15
In all areas of life you run into certain people who stand out from the rest. They are the ones who create energy, attract followers and make a difference in the lives of all those they interact with.  The Mindset of Success: From Good Management to Great Leadership by Jo Owen examines the characteristics of great leadership. After the completion of his fourteen year global research study, Owen suggests that it’s not your skills nor your abilities that will be the difference in being successful, it’s your mindset.
There are seven mindsets that are examined throughout the course of the book. They are:High Aspirations, Courage, Resilience, Positive Nature, Accountability, Collaborative Mindset, and Growth Mindset.
Throughout the book Jo Owen will explain to you why your mindset is the X-factor that takes individuals from good to being truly great in their roles as leaders.


The Golden Egg
The Obstacle to Success
"Mindset starts with ambition because our potential is limited by our ambition."- The Mindset of Success, page 17
Truly great leaders always seem to have a different outlook on business, relationships, challenges and life in general. They imagine, create and are able to act on and execute those visions. How exactly do they do that?
Author Jo Owen would suggest that at the foundation of this greatness is in their ability to think and dream differently than the masses. Owen says if you’re able to think and aspire differently, inherently you will act differently which puts you in a position to succeed.
The real obstacle to success lies in our own heads and the sooner we recognize that, the quicker we’ll position ourselves to circumvent it. There are always opportunities out there to be capitalized on and most people understand that fact. The difference between elite, successful people is that when those opportunities present themselves, they don’t just ignore them and continue moving through life thinking that’s for someone else. They recognize the opportunity, envision its potential and then, most importantly, act and execute upon it.
When you aspire to be great, you will constantly be looking for that opportunity to show the world your potential and ability but it all starts with that initial desire and ambition.

Gem #1
Dare to Act
"Chasing your dreams takes courage."- The Mindset of Success, page 49
During Owen’s research for this book, courage was the leadership quality that was repeatedly picked by the leadership panel as being vital to success. Think about it this way: early on in human history, courage was proven by overcoming physical threats (animals, climate, opposing tribes, etc.). In today’s business world, that’s not so much the case. Today’s courage comes by taking risks that effect the success of the company, the return to its shareholders, the livelihood of its employees and ultimately the personal reputation of the leader.
The question then becomes how do we exercise this “courage muscle” to be able to take on and handle the pressure and stress that comes along with risk in business today? The answer is actually quite simple Owen says. “Deep training and lots of practice trumps fear every time”. There’s a great example in the book of a fire chief explaining how he trains his new recruits. “First things first… A brave fireman soon becomes a dead fireman”. Interesting statement to make but what he then explained was that after countless hours of deep training and practice, a fire that you or I would consider risky and dangerous is quite routine and relatively safe to the firefighters.
Jo Owen encourages us to learn to take increasing risk and challenge in small steps. Doing this over time will equip you with the skill and confidence to perform in any situation that you desire.

Gem #2
Create the Right Context
"Every opportunity is an opportunity to learn and grow"- The Mindset of Success, page 39
Great leaders have this constant desire for growth, regardless of their situation. They see every task, job and interaction as an opportunity to learn, grow and develop. While that sounds easy enough, the growth mindset is requires an unending desire to be great. When looking at our careers, Owen has a five question test to help us determine if we are working in the right place for developing our skills and aspirations. They are:
1. Am I learning and growing? You should be gaining the sort of experience and skills that you can use and reuse in the future that you want to make for yourself.
2. Are there opportunities today and tomorrow? Are you in the right role with a supportive boss now, and can you see other opportunities on your journey of growth and development?
3. Do I enjoy what I am doing? You only excel at what you enjoy. There is a reason for this: doing well takes time, effort and commitment.
4. Are there good role models for me? We learn through experience, both our own and others.
5. Can I find the right support?
These questions help us to take a step back and objectively evaluate if our current opportunity is one that will help propel us to where we want to be long term. Having that type of self-awareness does not come easy yet is a critical component of becoming a great leader.

This book is a great reminder that we all have the ability to be extremely successful already inside of us.  The Mindset of Success provides a practical framework to follow to help its readers get out of their own way, become more self-aware and capitalize on their natural strengths and talents to be a successful person and leader.

PERSONAL SUCCESS SPECIAL ....................7 Ways Successful People Have Better Mindsets

7 Ways Successful People Have Better Mindsets

A successful person is not someone in a certain set of circumstances, but rather a person with a certain set of smart attitudes.


It's interesting to wonder why some people are more successful than others,especially if you yourself are aiming high.
What do people like Richard Branson, Elon Musk, and Bill Gates have that feeds their ongoing excellence and propels them to the highest levels of success?
The answers are complex, of course. But that doesn't mean they can't be learned.Each of these successful people shares certain smart mindsets--mindsets that any one of us can emulate, that will do us good no matter what level of success we aspire to.
Here are seven of the top examples:
1. Successful people don't take failure too seriously.
They see failure as the opportunity to begin again, but this time more intelligently. They know it's not a defining event, and they don't treat it as a problem unless it begins to become a habit. They win as if they are used to it, and they lose as if they're enjoying the challenge.
2. Successful people accept who they are and what they are about.
If you keep putting yourself down, there is no way for you to move forward. Successful people know the smartest mindset you can have is self-acceptance--refusing to be in an adversarial relationship with yourself.
3. Successful people set goals and work to achieve them.
Having a dream is great, but having a dream and goals is smart, because goals are how dreams become achievable. The most successful people are constantly setting and working toward goals to make a positive difference. Goals turn the invisible visible; they let you structure your thinking to always be looking for something you can do to bring you closer to what you want to achieve. Goals lead you to ask every day, "What am I doing that will move me toward where I want to be and what I want to achieve.?" Successful people not only set goals, they set them high. And they don't stop until they reach them.
4. Successful people don't leave things to chance.
Instead of passively hoping for the best, they take control to make things happen. You always have a choice: You can control your mind or you can let it control you. Refusing to leave things to chance shows inner strength, decisiveness, and a strong will. Incredible things happen when you decide to take control of what you can control and let go of the rest.
5. Successful people don't let themselves get sidetracked by problems.
If your mindset is negative, problems will grow in strength and constantly pull you down, sending you on detours of thought into some bad neighborhoods. On the other hand, with a positive mindset you will think of problems as a reason to be creative and come up with innovative solutions. The biggest problem is thinking of problems as problems. Successful people know that when you focus on problems you have more problems, but when you focus on possibilities you have more opportunities.
6. Successful people are decisive.
The most successful people are deft decision makers. They don't waffle or second-guess themselves. They take in the information they need, then clear out their mind and pick the best option based on what they know. If it turns out to be wrong, they learn from it. But they won't be guilty of not deciding at all.
7. Successful people are continually learning.
If you want to go far, borrow the mindset known in Zen Buddhism as shoshin, or learner's mind. That means you don't pretend to know it all but are open to learning and growth and development, with a mind that's fresh and enthusiastic and free of bias. Experience holds lessons for us all, but you have to remain teachable to take advantage of them.
If you're serious about being successful, cultivate these smart mindsets and see where they take you.

BY LOLLY DASKAL

http://www.inc.com/lolly-daskal/7-ways-successful-people-have-better-mindsets.html?cid=em01016week30a

DRINK SPECIAL .......................... Why You Should Drink More Tea (and Less Coffee)

Why You Should Drink More Tea (and Less Coffee)

It's safe to say that most people you ask will say that if they had to choose between tea and coffee, they would choose coffee hands down. This may be because its rich taste and high caffeine content gives us a boost that keeps us going. However, most of the time you should drop that cup of coffee and pick up a cup of hot and fragrant tea, and we'll tell you why!


1. Tea Hydrates the Body

Although coffee is also considered a hydrating liquid, tea has the added benefit of being hot water with tea flavoring. This means that it is much more beneficial to sit down and have a cup of tea because the beverage hydrates your body immediately. With coffee, it take time for the water to be absorbed because it so well mixed.

2. Serious Health Benefits

In a number of scientific studies it has been shown that tea can reduce the chances of certain kinds of cancers and diseases. This fact mostly applies for green tea, which has been glorified in many areas of Asia as the reason for their lean figure and better bill of health. Coffee does have some beneficial antioxidants, but not any more than a cup of tea can provide.

3. Tea Keeps You Going Longer

The adamant coffee drinker will interject here that tea may be healthier than coffee, but it can't compare when it comes to caffeine levels. This it seems is actually a myth. It has been shown that tea has the same amount of caffeine as coffee, but unlike coffee, tea does not have such a drastic energy depressing effect.

When you drink coffee, you get a large and quick dose of caffeine that causes your energy levels to drop at the same speed. Tea, however, has just as much caffeine, but because it is absorbed slower, energy depression will take place over a longer period of time. If you need a drink to keep going throughout the day, drink tea instead of coffee.  

4. More Antioxidant Power

The other thing an avid coffee drinker might tell you is that coffee has more and better antioxidants than tea. It appears that this too is a myth. Companies now put good antioxidants into things like tea to improve their health benefits, so it is uncertain that coffee has more antioxidants than tea.

5. Tea is a Great Weight loss Tool

Recent Research has shown that green tea may be a tremendous aid in weight loss. This is due to the fact that green tea helps kick-start your metabolism, but also that it is a much healthier substitute than sugar soft drinks. In comparison to any drink with added sugar, even coffee, tea is less likely to remain on your waistline, especially if you drink it with honey or a bit of sugar.
6. Dental Health

To be honest, excessive amounts of tea and coffee aren't good for your dental health, especially not for the whiteness of your teeth. However, if you must choose the lesser of the two evils, it is best to choose tea. Drinking a cup or two a day of tea will keep your levels of fluoride normal without any discoloration, while a few cups of coffee means even less fluoride and more discoloration.

7. Aids Bone Health

In a new Australian study it was found that people who drank tea on a regular basis had stronger bones and were less likely to develop osteoporosis thanks to high levels of tea catechins. A separate study found that drinking tea could too promote healthy bone formation. There aren't any positive things to say about coffee and bones, in fact your grandmother probably told you that drinking coffee too early could stunt your growth!



8. Helps Reduce Stress

Ahhh...That's the best word to describe the feeling of drinking a hot cup of tea. Unlike coffee that makes you jittery and puts you on high alert, tea soothes and relaxes your brain. There must be a reason why it is used by so many cultures as a bonding tool!

9. Give Your Immune System a Boost!

Although tea will most likely not cure you of the flu, it flushes the bug out of your system and will improve your immune system so you won't get sick in the future. This also depends on what kind of tea you are drinking. One cup of regular Earl Grey tea most likely won't do you much good, but a cup of ginger or honey and lemon tea will do the trick!

So remember the many health benefits of tea, next time you think about pouring yourself a cup of coffee!

ENERGY SPECIAL ...........................New catalyst enables direct production of fuels from CO2 using solar energy

New catalyst enables direct production of fuels from CO2 using solar energy

The sun is a clean and inexhaustible source of energy with the potential to provide a sustainable answer to all future energy supply demands. There’s just one outstanding problem: the sun doesn’t always shine and its energy is hard to store.
For the first time, researchers at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) and the ETH Zurich have unveiled a chemical process that uses the sun’s thermal energy to convert carbon dioxide and water directly into high-energy fuels: a procedure developed on the basis of a new material combination of cerium oxide and rhodium. This discovery marks a significant step towards the chemical storage of solar energy. The researchers published their findings in the research journal Energy and Environmental Science.

Several options to harnessing energy
The sun’s energy is already being harnessed in various ways: whilst photovoltaic cells convert sunlight into electricity, solar thermal installations use the vast thermal energy of the sun for purposes such as heating fluids to a high temperature. Solar thermal power plants involve the large-scale implementation of this second method: using thousands of mirrors, the sunlight is focused on a boiler in which steam is produced either directly or via a heat exchanger at temperatures exceeding 500°C. Turbines then convert thermal energy into electricity.
Researchers at PSI and the ETH Zurich have collaborated to develop a groundbreaking alternative to this approach. The new procedure uses the sun’s thermal energy to convert carbon dioxide and water directly into synthetic fuel.
“This allows solar energy to be stored in the form of chemical bonds,” explains Ivo Alxneit, chemist at the PSI’s Solar Technology Laboratory. “It’s easier than storing electricity.”
The new approach is based on a similar principle to that used by solar power plants.” Alxneit and his colleagues use heat in order to trigger certain chemical processes that only take place at very high temperatures above 1000°C. Advances in solar technology will soon enable such temperatures to be achieved using sunlight.

Producing fuel with solar heat
Alxneit’s research is based on the principle of the thermo-chemical cycle, a term comprising both the cyclical process of chemical conversion and the heat energy required for it. Ten years ago, researchers had already demonstrated the possibility of converting low-energy substances such as water and the waste product carbon dioxide into energy-rich materials such as hydrogen and carbon monoxide.
This works in the presence of certain materials such as cerium oxide. When subjected to very high temperatures above 1500°C, cerium oxide loses some oxygen atoms. At lower temperatures, this reduced material is keen to re-acquire oxygen atoms. If water and carbon dioxide molecules are directed over such an activated surface, they release oxygen atoms. Water is converted into hydrogen and carbon dioxide turns into carbon monoxide (CO), whilst the cerium re-oxidizes itself in the process, establishing the preconditions for the cerium oxide cycle to begin all over again.
The hydrogen and carbon monoxide created in this process can be used to produce fuel: specifically, gaseous or fluid hydrocarbons such as methane, petrol and diesel. Such fuels may be used directly but can also be stored in tanks or fed into the natural gas grid.

One process instead of two
Up to now, this type of fuel production required a second, separate process: the so-called Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis, developed in 1925. The European research consortium SOLAR-JET recently proposed a combination of a thermo-chemical cycle and the Fischer-Tropsch procedure.
However, as Alxneit explains: “although this basically solves the storage problem, considerable technical effort is necessary to carry out a Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis.” In addition to a solar installation, a second industrial-scale technical plant is required.

Direct production of solar fuel now possible
By developing a material that allows the direct production of fuel within one process, the new approach developed by Ivo Alxneit and his colleagues dispenses with the Fischer-Tropsch procedure and hence also with the second step. This was accomplished by adding small amounts of rhodium to the cerium oxide. It has been known for some time that rhodium permits reactions with hydrogen, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. The resulting fuels are either used or stored and the cyclical process begins again once the cerium oxide is re-activated.
“So far, our combined process only delivers small amounts of directly usable fuel,” concludes Alxneit. “But we have shown that our idea works and it’s taken us from the realms of science fiction to reality.”


CHEMWEEKLY 26JUL16