Beware the Smooth-Talking Job Applicant!
Every
manager who's been around the block has a story to tell about hiring someone
who was utterly and painfully wrong for the job he or she was hired into. If
the stars are aligned the right way, everybody notices the mismatch early on
and the new hire is moved into a more suitable job. That's the happy ending.
This
column is about the earlier part of the story -- about the shock that hits a
manager when the manager realizes that the newest person on board has no idea
whatsoever how to do the job, and no idea how to find out.
How
did these people get so badly miscast? They got jobs they were altogether
unsuited for by talking their way brilliantly through a job interview.
There
are a lot of people who are tremendous communicators, and a lot of other people
who are dazzled by top-notch communication skills. I enjoy listening to an articulate
and persuasive speaker as much as the next person.
When
someone is smart and can make a point convincingly, it's fun to talk with him
or her - you feel like you can share ideas for hours.
As
interviewers we can forget about what we really need in a new hire when we're
talking with a person who's a very strong communicator.
As
important as verbal communication abilities are in many jobs, a huge vocabulary
and skillful use of the language can sometimes disguise so-so or worse
judgment, interpersonal skills, or another essential qualification for a job.
I'm
not saying that very articulate people are necessarily less strong in other
areas, but I am pointing out that when someone is well-spoken, we can easily
overlook or even fail to dig in and learn about other qualities that are just
as important.
Hiring
managers, of course, are fallible humans. They fall victim to the same
decision-making slip-ups that everyone does, sometimes with disastrous results.
We got a call from a CEO who had just gone through a series of unfortunate
hires in leadership jobs.
He
called us when three people in Director and VP roles each lasted less than a
year with the company, which was growing and couldn't deal with that kind of
turnover. These three new hires didn't work out. They were great people, but
they had each been very unsuited to the roles they were hired for.
All
three of them had left the company through polite and professional mutual
agreements to part ways (each with a financial cushion to soften the blow). The
CEO was frustrated.
"We
must be doing something wrong in our interviewing," said the CEO.
"Will you come out here and work with me and our team?" We went. We
sat down together and looked at post-interview comment forms. We looked at the
comments from interviews where people were hired into jobs, and other
interviews where the candidates weren't hired.
What
did we notice? You will not be surprised to hear! The candidates who
interviewed most skillfully and 'sold themselves' most articulately got the job
more often than not. In conversations about successful and unsuccessful hiring
situations, we heard the same thing.
The
better a communicator a job-seeker was as indicated on the interviewer's rating
sheet and in the interviewer's comments, the more likely the candidate was to
be hired. In the case of the three people who hadn't worked out in their roles,
most or all of the interviewers' comments focused on the candidates'
communication skills.
"Articulate,
knowledgeable, very bright," said one reviewer's post-interview evaluation
sheet.
"We
are curious whether you talked with this candidate about how he would approach
the role," we asked.
"I
should have, but I didn't really go there," said the executive. "He
told me about speaking on panels and that sort of thing. He's a great speaker.
I didn't understand until later that his subject-matter knowledge was very
superficial."
We
can see why this might be. When we think about the 'halo effect' that fools all
of us at times into thinking that a person who's gifted in one area must
necessarily be an all-around prodigy, where does the halo form? It's very
likely that a person with a halo earned it through intelligent conversation.
Hiring managers need to get past the script
to learn more about a person than just his or her way with words. In the Interviewing
with a Human Voice protocol we invented and teach at Human Workplace,
we recommend that you invite your job candidates to ask you all their questions
before you ask one of yours.
You
may never get to your questions at all in the interview, and that's perfectly
fine. You can learn much more about a person's thought process by hearing his
or her questions for you than by asking your own questions, obviously. That's
what an interview is for -- to see another person's brain working. At an
effective job interview, a manager gets to see how a job-seeker thinks, and
vice versa.
That's
why we discourage interviewers from using scripted questions in job interviews.
Anyone with two functioning brain cells can anticipate the tired, traditional
job-interview questions, and most job-seekers do.
A
polished answer to the question "Where do you see yourself in five
years?," for instance, tells you almost nothing about the makeup of the
person you're meeting, and on top of that, the five-year question is irrelevant
unless you're planning to offer your new hire a five-year employment contract.
People
gifted with excellent rhetorical skills may be able to sell ice cubes to
Santa's elves, but that doesn't mean that silky-tongued individual is
necessarily the best person for the job.
When
you open the vault just enough to talk frankly with every job candidate about
what you're up against -- the reason the job is available, in other words - and
then hear his or her reactions and responses to your biggest challenges, that's
the magical moment in a job interview.
We
can drop all of the "Tell me about a time when..." nonsense and
simply lay out for our candidates what we're up against, and then just the way
we'd ask a plumber how s/he planned to get a sock out of the tub drain, we can
ask each applicant "What would you do to solve our problem?"
The
answer to that question is the interview moment where the rubber meets the
road. A job-seeker either understands your movie and is ready to jump in and start
filming, or not. You will be able to tell which in seconds once the candidate
begins to speak.
When
our ships come all the way into the harbor, believe me, we will spend our
afternoons sipping tea and nibbling on little cakes and cucumber sandwiches,
talking about everything that interests us for hours at a time. I can't wait.
That'll
be a blast. In the meantime, we can admire an artful turn of phrase and
appreciate good conversation, but when it comes to hiring we'll go back to the
basics, and hire not the most well-spoken job-seeker in the bunch but the right
person for the job.
Liz
Ryan Influencer
CEO and Founder, Human Workplace
No comments:
Post a Comment